Substituted olefins reactivities

The problem of the synthesis of highly substituted olefins from ketones according to this principle was solved by D.H.R. Barton. The ketones are first connected to azines by hydrazine and secondly treated with hydrogen sulfide to yield 1,3,4-thiadiazolidines. In this heterocycle the substituents of the prospective olefin are too far from each other to produce problems. Mild oxidation of the hydrazine nitrogens produces d -l,3,4-thiadiazolines. The decisive step of carbon-carbon bond formation is achieved in a thermal reaction a nitrogen molecule is cleaved off and the biradical formed recombines immediately since its two reactive centers are hold together by the sulfur atom. The thiirane (episulfide) can be finally desulfurized by phosphines or phosphites, and the desired olefin is formed. With very large substituents the 1,3,4-thiadiazolidines do not form with hydrazine. In such cases, however, direct thiadiazoline formation from thiones and diazo compounds is often possible, or a thermal reaction between alkylideneazinophosphoranes and thiones may be successful (D.H.R. Barton, 1972, 1974, 1975). 

The dipolar ion can react in several ways according to the solvent and the stmcture of the olefin. In inert solvents, if the carbonyl compound is highly reactive (eg, an aldehyde), the dipolar ion can be added to the carbonyl fragment to give the normal ozonide or 1,2,4-trioxolane (7) for example, 1,1-and 1,2-dialkylethylenes react in this manner. Tri- or tetraalkyl-substituted olefins produce a smaH, if any, yield of an ozonide when the ozonolysis is... 

The dienoplules for reaction with butadiene can be alkenes, allenes, and alkynes. Simple alkenes like ethylene are poor dienoplules resulting in sluggish reactions. Substituted olefins, X—C=C—X, are more reactive when X and/or X are C=C, Ar, COOR, COOH, COH, COR, COCl, CN,... 

The first cross metathesis to form a tetra-substituted olefin was achieved recently [146]. Howell and co-workers used lactams as substrates for CM with mono- and di-substituted olefins. The authors suggest that the limitations of the method are primarily due to steric reasons. Varying the electron density of the lactam showed no great influence on the reactivity while steric influences like a-branched allylic crosspartners or a methyl-group in the C4-position of the lactam both led to no reaction (Scheme 3.13). 

The quantitative treatment of the electron-transfer paradigm in Scheme l by FERET (equation (104)) is restricted to the comparative study of a series of structurally related donors (or acceptors). Under these conditions, the reactivity differences due to electronic properties inherent to the donor (or acceptor) are the dominant factors in the charge-transfer assessment, and any differences due to steric effects are considered minor. Such a situation is sufficient to demonstrate the viability of the electron-transfer paradigm to a specific type of donor acceptor behavior (e.g. aromatic substitution, olefin addition, etc.). However, a more general consideration requires that any steric effect be directly addressed. 

Hyperconjugation does not seem to have much effect on alkene reactivity towards bromine, since (16) applies whatever the number of alkyl groups on the double bond. However, only cis-olefins are involved in this correlation. To include geminally substituted olefins, an additional term is necessary, as in (19) where d is unity for the pem-disubstituted compounds and zero for... 

Already, at an early stage of the studies on the captodative effect, Viehe s group (Lahousse et ai, 1984) measured relative rates for the addition of t-butoxyl radicals to 4,4 -disubstituted 1,1-diphenylethylenes and to substituted styrenes. This study did not reveal a special character of captodative-substituted olefins in such reactions. It might be that the stability of the radical to be formed does not influence the early transition state of the addition step. The rationalization of the kinetic studies mentioned above in terms of the FMO model indicates, indeed, an early transition state for these reactions, with the consequence that product properties should not influence the reactivity noticeably. 

The order of reactivity of these three catalysts towards alkenes (but also towards oxygen) is 1 > 3 > 2. As illustrated by the examples in Table 3.18, these catalysts tolerate a broad spectrum of functional groups. Highly substituted and donor- or acceptor-substituted olefins can also be suitable substrates for RCM. It is indeed surprising that acceptor-substituted alkenes can be metathesized. As discussed in Section 3.2.2.3 such electron-poor alkenes can also be cyclopropanated by nucleophilic carbene complexes [34,678] or even quench metathesis reactions [34]. This seems, however, not to be true for catalysts 1 or 2. 

Because the addition steps are generally fast and consequently exothermic chain steps, their transition states should occur early on the reaction coordinate and therefore resemble the starting alkene. This was recently confirmed by ab initio calculations for the attack at ethylene by methyl radicals and fluorene atoms. The relative stability of the adduct radicals therefore should have little influence on reacti-vity 2 ). The analysis of reactivity and regioselectivity for radical addition reactions, however, is even more complex, because polar effects seem to have an important influence. It has been known for some time that electronegative radicals X-prefer to react with ordinary alkenes while nucleophilic alkyl or acyl radicals rather attack electron deficient olefins e.g., cyano or carbonyl substituted olefins The best known example for this behavior is copolymerization This view was supported by different MO-calculation procedures and in particular by the successful FMO-treatment of the regioselectivity and relative reactivity of additions of radicals to a series of alkenes An excellent review of most of the more recent experimental data and their interpretation was published recently by Tedder and... 

Thus, the alkynyllithium derived from the propargylic ether 302 underwent allylzincation under the above-mentioned conditions and led to the dimetallic species 303. Whereas treatment with NBS resulted in the formation of the dibromoolefin 304, reaction of 303 with the less reactive benzenesulfonyl chloride produced an ce-chlorozinc sulfinate 305. The latter could in turn react with different electrophiles and afforded the corresponding tri- or tetra-substituted olefins of type 306 as single geometric isomers (equation 144)179. 

This obstacle can be overcome by moving electron withdrawing substituents away from the double bond and increasing the reactivity of double bond by positioning it in a strained ring. This is achieved using bicyclic monomers. The monomers are readily obtained from the Diels-Alder reactions of substituted olefins with cyclopentadiene. This route is effective also for fluorinated monomers. These types of monomers undergo a ROMP with a variety of one component and two-component initiator systems. 

Reaction 9) (15). We also found that the ease with which olefins are oxidized in the presence of [MCl(CO) (Ph3P)2] (M = Rh, Ir) increases with the degree of substitution (12). Reactivity follows the order ... 

Cyclopropane formation occurs from reactions between diazo compounds and alkenes, catalyzed by a wide variety of transition-metal compounds [7-9], that involve the addition of a carbene entity to a C-C double bond. This transformation is stereospecific and generally occurs with electron-rich alkenes, including substituted olefins, dienes, and vinyl ethers, but not a,(J-unsaturated carbonyl compounds or nitriles [23,24], Relative reactivities portray a highly electrophilic intermediate and an early transition state for cyclopropanation reactions [15,25], accounting in part for the relative difficulty in controlling selectivity. For intermolecular reactions, the formation of geometrical isomers, regioisomers from reactions with dienes, and enantiomers must all be taken into account. 

Whereas FMO theory correctly predicts the regioselectivity for cycloadditions in simple alkyl-substituted olefinic systems,51,58 extension of similar calculations for cycloadducts (7a,b-lla,b)120 predicts the formation of regioisomer a, although, except in the case of 7 and 8, the b isomer is the predominant one. The differences between prediction and experiment in stereoselectivity have been attributed primarily to double bond rehybridization arising from double bond distortion in bridgehead olefins,142 which also explains their enhanced reactivity.96,120 Also double-bond deformation that will alter the normal mixing of alkyl substituent orbitals with localized rc-bond orbitals may explain the unexpected formation of 8b.120 Attempts to explain the formation of the b isomers, based on a two-step diradical mechanism, also have failed.120... 

In several recent studies, nitro-substituted olefins have been shown to exhibit high electrophilic reactivities in superacid-promoted reactions.29 NMR studies have been used to identify some of the superelectrophilic intermediates in these reactions. For example, it was found that nitroethy-lene reacts with benzene in the presence of 10 equivalents of CF3SO3H to give deoxybenzoin oxime in 96% yield (eq 29). Since the reaction does not occur with only one equivalent of TfOH, it was proposed that the N,N-dihydroxy-iminium-methylium dication (51) is generated. In spectroscopic studies, l-nitro-2-methyl-l-propene (52) was dissolved in CF3SO3H, and at —5°C the stable dication (53) could be directly observed by and 13 C NMR spectroscopy (eq 30). 

---