Subsidiarity

A good way of demonstrating the importance of parepistemes, or in other terms, the virtues of subsidiarity, is to pick and analyse just a few examples, out of the many hundreds which could be chosen in the broad field of materials science and engineering. 

ECHA points out that some materials currently considered as waste might in future be considered to have ceased to be waste [15]. These materials will then be out of the scope of waste legislation, and - if not covered by an exemption - will potentially fall under REACH. Clarification of end-of-waste criteria is a matter for waste legislation. In accordance with the general principle of subsidiarity of the European Union law, and following the revised Waste Framework Directive, Member States may decide case by case whether certain waste has ceased to be waste, where end-of-waste criteria have not been set at Community level. Member States have already worked for use of this regulation, like, e.g., the Waste Quality Protocol in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland [16]. 

One year after the proposal of the Soil Framework Directive, the European Parliament adopted its first reading. However, in 2010, a few countries impeded the continuation of the process on the basis of excessive cost, administrative burden and subsidiarity. To date, the proposal remains on the council s table [131]. 

Only one central, well identified authority should be responsible for application for, granting, revocation or suspension of a permit and the monitoring of permitted activities. A number of national legislations follow this approach, such as the Finland Act on the Environmental Protection of Antarctica of 18 October 1996 and the 1997 Japanese Law Relating to Protection of the Environment in Antartica (64-68). The involvement of different bodies in the decisionmaking process can only complicate and slow down the procedure. The principle of subsidiarity has no reason to be invoked in the case of Antarctic activities. 

A distinguishing feature of the allocation process in the EU ETS is the highly decentralised manner in which it was done. This characteristic is what could be expected of a multilateral system in which the constituent members retain significant elements of national sovereignty, not to mention one in which the principle of subsidiarity is enshrined in principle and practice. Nevertheless, the role of the centre was critical in arriving at the result that can be observed today. Indeed, it is hard to imagine how twenty-five nations could have succeeded in such a multinational enterprise without the central coordinating role played by the European Commission. Three aspects of this role are especially important. 

In line with the principle of subsidiarity, it was up to the member states and regions to devise and implement specific programmes, although these were subject to the approval of the European Commission. The regions had to finance 10-50 per cent of the expenditure in these programmes, while the rest was financed by the European Commission (50-75 per cent) and member states. 

Furthermore, a stronger focus on the principle of subsidiarity with more decentralised policy and decision making may introduce further differences among member states and/or regions within such member states. This may have unforeseeable effects on the development of organic farming and the cohesion of the sector itself. 

SUBSIDIARITY Principle, specified in the EU Common Act (Article 5), by which governmental or societal responsibilities are assumed by the smallest possible administrative unit. 

Some Federal/Stale issues (eg, shipment of waste) Maastricht — subsidiarity ... 

Environmental protection measures should be taken at the most appropriate level , taking into account the type of pollution, the action needed, and the geographical zone to be protected. This is known as the subsidiarity principle ... 

In areas which do not fall within its exciusive competence [such as the environment], the Community shall take action, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or the effects of the proposed action, be better achieved by the Community. 

The principle of subsidiarity, as laid down in Article 3B of the EC Treaty, is a general guideline for the action of the EU inter alia, in the field of the environment. It comprises two tests. First, it formally introduces an efficiency testinto the EC Treaty. Matters that can be dealt with better at the EU level should be regulated by the EU matters that are better dealt with by the Members States should be left to their competence. Secondly, it comprises the principle of proportionality. This principle adds to the efficiency consideration that matters which are dealt with at a European level should not regulate more than is strictly necessary. The efficiency and proportionality tests in Article 3B, if correctly used, allowfor an optimal differentiation of rules with an effective distribution of competencies between the EU and the Member States. 

Principle of subsidiarity Managing with subsystems. The fact that people differ in abilities and aspirations. .. require that the individual, to the extent feasible, should be allowed to pursue the basic goods in the manner she chooses. When the group must make a collective decision and cannot defer to the individual, the group should be as small as possible, since this allows the group to... 

Rule Emphasis on subsidiarity, personal responsibility and personal discernment. Holistic development of each employee. 

The key Rule management principle of subsidiarity requires a highly qualihed workforce, educated as whole persons with a clear appreciation of the wider context of their work and with a commitment to take responsibility. That is, it requires staff who are committed to both quality of work done and quality of life. 

---