Subject modeling

In the subjective model, the types locally named B and C, and their associations b, c, and d, all form part of a A s model they are really state types. In other words, those members of B (or C) that happen to be contained within an A also satisfy any additional properties stated about B or C on this diagram. (Specifically, those additional properties do not... 

Subjective model To describe constraints on objects of some types that are specific to their being in some relation with others. 

The subjective model of containment is unique to our approach. It is related to the idea of subject-oriented programming [Harrison93], which is focused more in composing 00 implementations. 

The next step is choice of research subject model. It has been said before that design of experiments rests on cybernetic concepts about the research subject. A black box> is therefore recommended as the research subject model, which will be affected by various controllable factors. The defining principles of such a model cor-... 

Factors may have associated values called levels of variations. Each state of a black box has a definite combination of factor levels. The more different states of the black box that exist, the more complex is the research subject. Formalization of preliminary information includes analysis of reference data, expert opinions and use of direct data, which enables correct selection of response, factors and null point or center of experiment. Factor limitations are also defined at this stage. If the research is linked with several following responses, then response limitations also have to be analyzed. The next phase refers to defining the research problem. When defining this problem one must keep in mind the research-subject model, and in a general case it is Eq. (2.1) that defines the link between the inlet and outlet of the black box. Defining the research problem is possible only now when its aim has been determined, the criteria established, the factors, limitations and null point defined. The problem is a simple one when only one response or optimization criterion is in... 

Apart from the analyzed requirements to be fulfilled by an optimization parameter, one should also, when choosing the response, keep in mind the fact that this parameter affects, up to a point, the choice of the research subject model. Economic parameters are by their nature additive, so that they can be easily modeled by simple functions, which is not applicable to physical and chemical responses. 

Design of experiments insists on measuring all responses and then, by means of correlation analysis, research subject models for the least possible number of responses or for general response are made up. This does not mean that there are no cases in practice when correlated responses are used. 

Animal models of schizophrenia are intended to examine specific neurochemical or anatomical theories of the illness, and not to model the cluster of symptoms that characterizes the illness, since these are largely subjective. Models are divided into two types, pharmacological models and lesions models (Marcotte et al., 2001). 

Table 6.3 Structures of common spatial covariance structures ESTIMATION OF THE MIXED EFFECT assuming three measurements per subject. MODEL PARAMETERS...

Now suppose that we look at how models D and E compare with respect to estimating (i) the overall value of (3 and (ii) the value for a given subject. As regards the first of these, the situation for model E is quite simple. Each subject provides an independent estimate of the same p. The most efficient overall estimate of this (3 is the mean of the 16 values. As regards the second, the situation for model D is quite simple. Each subject is given a different slope parameter. Only data from the given subject have anything to say directly about this parameter and, essentially, our estimate of for subject i is simply based on the four values for that subject. Model D appears to have... 

Kowalski, B. VanLehn, K. Inducing subject models from protocol data. In V. Patel (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum. 1988. 

---