Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Storage of seawater samples

The acidification of seawater samples is required for the storage of seawater in order to prevent the precipitation, adsorption of trace metals on the container walls or volatilization loss from solution. Generally, nitric acid is added to seawater to bring the pH of the solutions to below 1.5. The addition of acids immediately after collection on board ship may be preferable for sample storage rather than addition before analysis in the laboratory. [Pg.101]

The loss of mercury from water samples on storage has been shown to be a serious problem by many workers [24—26]. These losses of mercury are caused by rapid adsorption on container walls [25, 29] and reduction of mercury to the atomic state followed by volatilization from solution [29], Lo and Wai reported that 81% of mercury in untreated samples was lost to the walls of the polyethylene containers and the remaining 19% was volatilized to the atmosphere [29], Bothner and Robertson observed mercury contamination of seawater samples due to the diffusion of mercury vapor from the laboratory into the polyethylene containers [31]. [Pg.102]


Degobbis [60] studied the storage of seawater samples for ammonia determination. The effects of freezing, filtration, addition of preservatives, and type of container on the concentration of ammonium ions in samples stored for up to a few weeks were investigated. Both rapid and slow freezing were equally effective in stabilising ammonium ion concentration, and the addition of phenol as a preservative was effective in stabilising non-frozen samples for up to two weeks. [Pg.53]

Ashton and Chan [ 1 ] have reviewed the techniques for the collection of seawater samples preservation, storage, and prevention of contamination are all discussed. The most appropriate measurement techniques, preconcentration and extraction, method validation, and analytical control are all covered. The apparent aluminium content of seawater stored in ordinary containers such as glass and polyethylene bottles decreases gradually, e.g., to half in 2.5 h. But if the samples are acidified with 0.5ml/l concentrated sulfuric acid the aluminium content remains constant for at least one month. Accordingly, samples should be acidified immediately after collection. However, the aluminium could be recovered by acidifying the stored samples and leaving them for at least five hours. [Pg.22]

During the storage of the sample, loss of analyte can occur via vaporisation, degradation, and/or adsorption. Adsorption of trace organic and inorganic species in seawater to container walls can severely affect the accuracy of their determination. The adsorption of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethylene [67] and hexachlorobiphenyl [68] onto glass containers has been observed. [Pg.46]

For long-term storage of seawater, the special glass ampoules used by the Standard Sea Water Service should be employed. Seawater sealed in this type of resistant glass has been found to remain unchanged with respect to sample composition, electrical conductivity and density over a period of several years (see also Chapters 3 and 11). [Pg.35]

Yamamoto et al. [6] studied preservation of arsenic- and antimony-bearing samples of seawater. One-half of the sample (201) was acidified to pH 1 with hydrochloric acid immediately after sampling, and the remaining half was kept without acidification. In order to clarify the effect of acidification on storage, measurements were made over a period of a month after sampling. Results are given in Table 1.1. In this study, a standard addition method and calibration curve method were used for comparison and it was proven that the two gave the same results for the analyses of seawater. [Pg.22]

If we were to choose the ideal method for the analysis of any component of seawater, it would naturally be an in situ method. Where such a method is possible, the problems of sampling and sample handling are eliminated and in many cases we can obtain continuous profiles rather than limited number of discrete samples. In the absence of an in situ method, the next most acceptable alternative is analysis on board ship. A real-time analysis not only permits us to choose our next sampling station on the basis of the results of the last station, it also avoids the problem of the storage of samples until the return to a shore laboratory. [Pg.37]

The important influence that sample container materials can have on seawater sample composition is illustrated next by two examples one concerning the storage of metal solutions in glass and plastic bottles, the other concerning the storage of solutions of phthalic acid esters and polychlorinated biphenyls in glass and plastic. [Pg.39]

Robertson [ 57 ] has measured the adsorption of zinc, caesium, strontium, antimony, indium, iron, silver, copper, cobalt, rubidium, scandium, and uranium onto glass and polyethylene containers. Radioactive forms of these elements were added to samples of seawater, the samples were adjusted to the original pH of 8.0, and aliquots were poured into polyethylene bottles, Pyrex-glass bottles and polyethylene bottles contained 1 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid to bring the pH to about 1.5. Adsorption on the containers was observed for storage periods of up to 75 d with the use of a Nal(Tl) well crystal. Negligible adsorption on all containers was registered for zinc, caesium, strontium, and... [Pg.44]

Losses of Phthalic Acid Esters and Polychlorinated Biphenyls from Seawater Samples During Storage... [Pg.46]

Scarponi et al. [93] used anodic stripping voltammetry to investigate the contamination of seawater by cadmium, lead, and copper during filtration and storage of samples collected near an industrial area. Filtration was carried... [Pg.50]

The first aim of this work was to study the influence of an unwashed membrane filter on the cadmium, lead, and copper concentrations of filtered seawater samples. It was also desirable to ascertain whether, after passage of a reasonable quantity of water, the filter itself could be assumed to be clean so that subsequent portions of filtrate would be uncontaminated. If this were the case, it should be possible to eliminate the cleaning procedure and its contamination risks. The second purpose of the work was to test the possibility of long-term storage of samples at their natural pH (about 8) at 4 °C, kept in low-density polyethylene containers which have been cleaned with acid and conditioned with seawater. [Pg.51]

Scarponi et al. [781] studied the influence of an unwashed membrane filter (Millpore type HA, 47 mm diameter) on the cadmium, lead, and copper concentrations of filtered seawater. Direct simultaneous determination of the metals was achieved at natural pH by linear-sweep anodic stripping voltammetry at a mercury film electrode. These workers recommended that at least 1 litre of seawater be passed through uncleaned filters before aliquots for analysis are taken the same filter can be reused several times, and only the first 50-100 ml of filtrate need be discarded. Samples could be stored in polyethylene containers at 4 °C for three months without contamination, but losses of lead and copper occurred after five months of storage. [Pg.268]

Sullivan et al. [374] studied the loss of PCBs from seawater samples during storage. [Pg.423]

Stoeppler and Matthes [44] have made a detailed study of the storage behaviour of methylmercury and mercuric chloride in seawater. They recommended that samples spiked with inorganic and/or methylmercury chloride be stored in carefully cleaned glass containers acidified with hydrochloric acid to pH 2.5. Brown glass bottles were preferred. Storage of methylmercury chloride should not exceed 10 days. [Pg.461]

May et al. [45] used radiochemical studies to ascertain the behaviour of methylmercury chloride and mercuric chloride in seawater under different storage conditions. The application of 203Hg unambiguously revealed that the loss of mercury observed upon storage of unacidified seawater samples in polyethylene bottles was due to adsorption and to the diffusion of metallic Hg (Hg°) through the container wall. [Pg.462]

Inorganic arsenic species, As111 and Asv, in natural water and anoxic seawater samples were not stable (Cutter et al., 1991). Rapid freezing and storage at —4°C was recommended as a means of preservation. Particulate samples were collected in acid-cleaned plastic bags, and then frozen. [Pg.415]

Clementson, L.A. and S.E. Wayte. 1992. The effect of frozen storage of open-ocean seawater samples on the concentration of dissolved phosphate and nitrate. Water Res. 26 1171-1176. [Pg.34]

Sirinawin, W. and S. Westerlund. 1997. Analysis and storage of samples for chromium determination in seawater. Anal. Chim. Acta 356 35 40. [Pg.35]

In analysis of marine samples by AAS problems are encountered in sampling procedure, sample storage, sample treatment and measurement procedures. Analytical difficulties arise from the low concentration of most elements and complex matrices in marine samples. In this chapter, a general discussion on marine analysis by AAS will be provided in terms of seawater, marine organisms and sediments. [Pg.96]

A large discrepancy between the two concentration techniques was found for the copper results. The average difference was 72 27 ngl-1. Bruland and Frank analysed the Chelex column effluent by the solvent extraction technique, and found 63 and 135ngl-1 as the copper content for the samples at 25 m and 2500 m, respectively. These values are almost equal to the difference between the Chelex and solvent extraction results. Therefore, they concluded that about 60% of the copper in seawater (unfiltered and unacidified) is not removed by the Chelex technique. As Riley et al. suggested, copper in seawater is not liberated by the Chelex resin because of association with colloids and fine particulates [62]. In order to avoid this error, acidification and heating of seawater is necessary prior to the Chelex treatment. According to the results of Bruland and Franks, acidification and storage followed by solvent extraction appears to be superior to the Chelex resin concentration for the quantitative determination of copper in seawater [15]. Similar problems have been pointed out by Eisner and Mark, Jr. [63] and Florence and Batley [64]. [Pg.112]


See other pages where Storage of seawater samples is mentioned: [Pg.152]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.5022]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.5022]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.1360]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.1360]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]   


SEARCH



Samples storage

Storage of samples

© 2024 chempedia.info