Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stepped flow tests

Two protocols are presented for non-Newtonian fluids. Basic Protocol 1 is for time-independent non-Newtonian fluids and is a ramped type of test that is suitable for time-independent materials. The test is a nonequilibrium linear procedure, referred to as a ramped or stepped flow test. A nonquantitative value for apparent yield stress is generated with this type of protocol, and any model fitting should be done with linear models (e.g., Newtonian, Herschel-Bulkley unithit). [Pg.1143]

BASIC PROTOCOL 1 MEASURING VISCOSITY WITH NONEQUILIBRIUM RAMPED OR STEPPED FLOW TESTS... [Pg.1146]

The response of time-dependent samples to reversed or looped flow measurement reveals a hysteresis. If the two steps of the flow test overlap, then the sample is able to accommo-... [Pg.1138]

For most samples, a step maximum time of 5 to 25 min should be set, so as to interrupt the step if steady state is unlikely to be achieved. All of the acceptance parameters can. be considered as a sliding scale. A fast equilibrium flow test can be not much better than, a continuous ramp. If the sample is time dependent with slow rebuild kinetics, then the times should be pushed to their longest limits. Sample stability is an issue, so if the sample is likely to dry or gel at the temperature of interest, the analysis should be carried out quickly (i.e., with shorter step maximum times). [Pg.1149]

Hazard potential for each effluent was calculated using a mathematical formula (the PEEP index) proposed by Costan et al. (1993). This formula integrates the ecotoxic responses of the battery of tests before and after a biodegradation step. Toxicity test endpoint responses are first transformed to toxic units. The product of effluent toxicity and effluent flow (m3/h) gives the toxic loading value. The log 10 value of an effluent s toxic loading corresponds to its PEEP index. In order to rank the effluents a toxicity classification scale is generated (Tab. 11). [Pg.249]

Step 7. Test your selected eluent in an aqueous system. Prepare a set of identical anion-exchange resin columns according to the article. Prepare a set of identical 1-L samples of tap water. Pipette into each sample 1 mL iodide carrier and 5 mL radio-iodine tracer and mix. Let samples flow through column at flow rate of no more than 5 mL per minute. Prepare 200 mL solutions of the selected eluting agents. [Pg.95]

Compared to lateral flow tests, this principle was one step ahead in result quantification and possible applications, but also in complexity of the processing device and disposable. [Pg.319]

The MPI implementation was performed according to a method that Fischer [3] used in his incompressible Legendre hp-spectral method. The method is based on the use of three arrays that keep track of the global/local element and mortar numbering, the processor on which the local element and mortars are allocated, and the face side of the slave element of a mortar. The mortars are allocated at the same processor in which the master domain is allocated. The MPI code was tested for a laminar backward-facing step flow on the local 8-node (16-processor) Beowulf cluster and showed an efficiency of 90% for large grids (Fig. 3.1). [Pg.22]

The rheological behavior of these materials is still far from being fully understood but relationships between their rheology and the degree of exfoliation of the nanoparticles have been reported [73]. An increase in the steady shear flow viscosity with the clay content has been reported for most systems [62, 74], while in some cases, viscosity decreases with low clay loading [46, 75]. Another important characteristic of exfoliated nanocomposites is the loss of the complex viscosity Newtonian plateau in oscillatory shear flow [76-80]. Transient experiments have also been used to study the rheological response of polymer nanocomposites. The degree of exfoliation is associated with the amplitude of stress overshoots in start-up experiment [81]. Two main modes of relaxation have been observed in the stress relaxation (step shear) test, namely, a fast mode associated with the polymer matrix and a slow mode associated with the polymer-clay network [60]. The presence of a clay-polymer network has also been evidenced by Cole-Cole plots [82]. [Pg.588]

Figure 2.23 Step response test data from polymer reactor. Upper diagram initiator flow rate (ml/min) lower diagram fraction monomer conversion... Figure 2.23 Step response test data from polymer reactor. Upper diagram initiator flow rate (ml/min) lower diagram fraction monomer conversion...
The dynamic response of composition to a change in distillate flow exhibits considerable dead time, as is expected in a multicapacity process. But the presence of an additional feature is indicated by step-response tests. Figure 11.13 illustrates results which are typically encountered. The response is the sort which would be seen in a transmission line with... [Pg.303]

As a POC (point of care) device semi-quantitative flow-immunoassay methods for the detection of antibodies or antigens had been developed and are well establish in e.g. pregnancy tests. This format is also known as strip test, one step strip test, immunochromatographic test, rapid flow diagnostic, rapid immunoassay or lateral flow immunoassay (LFI). The label is anyway a colored colloidal particle. Additionally to metal colloids, carbon (black) and silica or latex (various colors) are in use. [Pg.161]

Perform a series of steady-state runs to determine the amount of steam required to raise the temperature of the feed water stream to about 200°F (about 80°C). Then, switch to the dynamic mode of operation and perform step response testing by varying the inlet flow rate and feed temperature to determine the process response. Remember to use the strip charts to observe the important process variables. [Pg.273]

S ystem identification is the term used to define a procedure to characterize the process response. In this case, system identification can be accomplished by setting the default level controller set point at 50 per cent (under Liquid Valve ), adjusting the steam flow to the heater in steps, up and down, and then observing the temperature response on a strip chart. This is termed step response testing and is the same as was done in the previous workshop. [Pg.276]

The chief quantities based on tracer tests are summarized in Table 23-4. Effluent concentrations resulting from impulse and step inputs are designated Cg and C , respectively. The initial mean concentration resulting from an impulse of magnitude m into a vessel of volume is C = mfVr- The mean residence time is the ratio of the vessel volume to the volumetric flow rate, t = V fV or t = jo tCg dt/jo Cg dt. The reduced time is t = t/t. [Pg.2083]

Spreadsheet Analysis Once validation is complete, prescreening the measurements using the process constraints as the comparison statistic is particularly usenil. This is the first step in the global test discussed in the rectification section. Also, an initial adjustment in component flows will provide the initial point for reconciliation. Therefore, the goals of this prescreening are to ... [Pg.2566]

Step 1.3 Identify and Allocate Additional Resources. The audit may require external resources, such as laboratory facilities and possibly equipment for air sampling, flow measurements, energy measurements, and product-quality testing. [Pg.358]

A practical method of predicting the molecular behavior within the flow system involves the RTD. A common experiment to test nonuniformities is the stimulus response experiment. A typical stimulus is a step-change in the concentration of some tracer material. The step-response is an instantaneous jump of a concentration to some new value, which is then maintained for an indefinite period. The tracer should be detectable and must not change or decompose as it passes through the mixer. Studies have shown that the flow characteristics of static mixers approach those of an ideal plug flow system. Figures 8-41 and 8-42, respectively, indicate the exit residence time distributions of the Kenics static mixer in comparison with other flow systems. [Pg.748]


See other pages where Stepped flow tests is mentioned: [Pg.1135]    [Pg.1135]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.1148]    [Pg.1219]    [Pg.1403]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.6499]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.1566]    [Pg.2554]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.306]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.378 , Pg.379 , Pg.382 ]




SEARCH



Flow test

Step testing

Stepping test

© 2024 chempedia.info