Statute of limitations

EPA cannot recover civil penalties for any violation that occurred more than five years before the EPA commenced an administrative penalty proceeding. Although the EPA routinely sought penalties for violations more than five years old, this issue was finally resolved in 3M v. Browner, which held that a federal catch-all statute of limitations applied to TSCA penalty proceedings. 

---

Anyone who violates the exclusive rights of a copyright owner is Hable for infringement in a lawsuit brought in federal court. There is a three-year statute of limitations on copyright infringement actions. 

The criminal case regarding the Columbine Massacre will remain open indefinitely because there is no statute of limitations for the crime of murder. However, questions about protecting our children at school will remain forever. No one expected that our sense of security would be threatened — by our own children. It has been threatened time-and-time-again, and there seems to be no solution or remedy at hand. 

The 1979 rescission of the statute of limitations for murder in Germany is an example of special legislation that has had grave consequences. The decision to revoke this statute was the result of political pressure. Concerns regarding potential miscarriages of justice were rationalized away. The... 

Rescission of the Statute of Limitations Breach of Legal Tradition... 

On March 20, 1979, and July 3, 1979, the members of the Bundestag, the lower house of the then West German Parliament, debated on the rescission of the statute of limitations for murder. The corresponding bill was passed into law on July 3,1979, with a very close margin of 255 to 222 votes.3... 

Reminders that Article 103 of the German Basic Law prohibits retroactive laws were bmshed aside with reference to a 1969 decision of the Federal Constitutional Court. The opponents of the rescission of the statute of limitations raised further judicial concerns. Dr. Alois Mertes (CDU/CSU) pointed out the conflict between justice, and peace as required by the law. In European legal tradition, limitation means exclusively the protection of the state [and certainly of the individual as well [from miscarriages ofjustice. And ... 

Originally the statute of limitations was to be rescinded only for cases of so-called NS-murders.11 Members of Parliament Maihofer and Helmrich openly supported this plan. However, constitutional concerns were raised about such very obvious special legislation, so that in the end the rescission was applied to murder in general. 

It is beyond the scope of this report to ascertain whether a rescission of the statute of limitations for NS-murders or for murder in general would reverse into such impracticability. This requires a detailed practical understanding and assessment of actual conditions, particularly of the investigative and evidential problems involved [.., ]. 12... 

In its every stage, the Weise Trial entailed problems which most likely did not arise only in this case, but in other, similar trials as well. What happened and continues to happen in the case of Gottfried Weise, therefore, is a general model of the legal problems created by the rescission of the statute of limitations. 

The DOL also has the right to seek an injunction, which means that the secretary of labor files a restraint prohibiting future violations of FLSA laws. Damages may include back pay (statute of limitations is 2 years for unintentional violations and 3 years for willful violations), penalties, attorney fees, and court costs. In a lawsuit, as opposed to an administrative audit by the DOL, employees generally collect back pay and liquidated damages in the amount of back pay (double damages). 

Regarding latency , in some toxic tort actions, the alleged adverse effects of exposure may not be immediately apparent because the injuries have not yet manifested themselves or because the harm goes undetected for a period of time. Latency often becomes an issue in lawsuits involving cancer, birth defects, and genetic mutations, and statutes of limitation or rules of accrual may be modified to accommodate those situations where the moment of the defendant s action and the discovery of the injury are separated by substantial intervals of time (typically years). 

The PMN regulations require that PMN submitters retain for five years (i) documentation supporting information provided in the PMN, (ii) documentation supporting the date of commencement of manufactme or import and (iii) production volume records for the first three years of manufacture or import. However, the statute of limitations for enforcement actions is five years and so it is important to be able to support the PMN submission for at least five years. It is prudent to retain this data much longer—for five years after the last manufacture or importation of the PMN substance—because there are continuing violations that relate back to the PMN submission, and the complete file and backup information will be important to defend against an enforcement action even it is brought many years after the PMN is filed. 

The 5 ERP also has examples that calculate penalties for more than five years of violation, contrary to 3M v. Browner,which found that there is a five year statute of limitations for TSCA violations. It also discusses a one thousand kg limit for LVEs, although the limit was raised to ten thousand kg in 1985. 

The regulations require retaining all records relating to an R D exemption for five years after the records are developed. In practice, it is necessary to retain these records for five years after the R D substance is either put on the Inventory or no longer used. The statute of limitations for TSCA violations is five years, and a manufacturer bears the burden of proving compliance with the R D exemption for five years after it ceases to rely on the R D exemption. 

C.F.R. i 723.50(n). These recordkeeping requirements were inadvertentiy dropped out of the rules in a technical correction made by the EPA at 60 Fed. Reg. 34462 (July 3, 1995). They were reinstated by the EPA four years later at 64 Fed. Reg. 31987 (June 15. 1999). It is unclear whether or not a manufacture who relied on the first technical correction and did not maintain records during the four year gap period could be found in violation of the now reinstated recordkeeping requirements. The prudent course would be for any manufacturer in that situation to attempt, to the extent possible, to reassemble that documentation for the information submitted in the application and for information submitted subsequent to the apphcation grant. Production records for that gap period would already be beyond the statute of limitations. 

All records in a SNUN must be retained for five years from the date of submission, according to the regulations. As a practical matter, this is likely to be inadequate, and the complete SNUN file should be retained for five years after the last day on which the SNUR substance was used for a significant new use or distributed to others. The manufacturer, importer or processor has the burden of proving compliance with a SNUR, and should keep records of its compliance so it can defend an enforcement action. Since the statute of limitations for TSCA enforcement is five years, it is important to maintain records for five years after the relevant activity has been discontinued. 

After receiving a self-report, the EPA has five years from the date of each self-reported violation to issue a complaint assessing a penalty. The five-year statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the violation, and not on the date of the self-report. While no one should expect this to happen, there have been occasions when the EPA has not issued a complaint for a penalty assessment before the statute of limitations has expired on aU of the violations disclosed in a self-report. 

The warranty that the business and assets are being operated in conformity with regulatory requirements is often entitled Compliance with Law, and potentially has three levels. First, is that the business as a whole is generally in compliance with law second is that the business is in compliance with environmental laws generally and third, that the business is in compliance with TSCA. While buyers want these warranties to survive for at least the five-year statute of limitations, sellers are unlikely to agree to such a long time period. 

The statute also imposes a lower tier penalty on false statements to a governor in connection with a request to defer the deadline for submitting a management plan, but the statute only permitted deferrals until May 9, 1989 and the statute of limitations on such violations has long passed. 

The Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule requires renovators to create certifications and keep records that demonstrate compliance with the each detail of the renovation rules for three years, or longer if required by another law7 In practice it is important to retain compliance documents for longer, and the exact length of time depends on the state in which the renovator operates. In most jurisdictions the statute of limitations for a tort action brought by a person who was a child at the time of an injury can be extended beyond the time that would have been allowed for an adult to bring a tort action.In any event records should be maintained for the five years of the TSCA statute of limitations. ... 

Contracts and leases must be retained for three years, but as is the case with other TSCA programs, the statute of limitations may be significantly longer and documents should be retained until the longest statute of limitations runs. 

The civil action is filed within the 2- or 3-year statute of limitations."... 

Most state workers compensation coverage provides a relatively long statute of limitations. For injury claims, most states grant between 1 and 10 years to file the claim for benefits. For work-related illnesses, the statute of limitations may be as high as 20 to 30 years from the time the employee first noticed the illness or the illness was diagnosed. An employee who incurred a work-related injury or illness is normally not required to be employed with the employer when the claim for benefits is filed. 

Sec. 114. Providing for Interest and Extending the Statute of Limitations in Actions Against the Federal Government. 

---