Statistical methods principal components analysis

The multivariable statistical method Principal Components Analysis (PCA) is used as a means of establishing which products are viewed similarly by... 

The governing parameters for the long-range conversion of (5)-acyl isopeptides (41 X = [CHRCOl OH) to native peptide analogues (42 X = [CHRCO]j OH) via intramolecular S-to-N acyl transfer (Scheme 13) are shown by computational and statistical methods (principal component analysis and cluster analysis) of model... 

To understand these processes and correlate residue profiles with specific toxic responses required congener-specific methods of analysis and complex statistical techniques (principal component analysis). Using these techniques, it was established that eggs of Forster s terns of two colonies differed significantly in PCB composition (Schwartz and Stalling 1991). Similar techniques were used to identify various PCB-contaminated populations of harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) in Denmark (Storr-Hansen and Spliid 1993). 

It may be possible to use an array of electrodes containing various enzymes in combination with multivariate statistical analyses (principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, partial least-squares regression) to determine which pesticide(s) the SPCE has been exposed to and possibly even how much, provided sufficient training sets of standards have been measured. The construction methods for such arrays would be the same as described in this protocol, with variations in the amounts of enzyme depending on the inhibition constants of other cholinesterases for the various pesticides of interest. 

Rodriguez-Delgado et al. used statistical and principal component analysis to estabhsh some general equations that relate the retention, in MLC, to several molecular descriptors of 17 PAHs eluted with mobile phases of SDS, CTAB and Brij 35 without alcohol [22], and with methanol, 2-propanol or 1-butanol [26]. PAHs are widely distributed pollutants in the environment and show mu enic and carcinogenic properties. Therefore, great efforts have been made to develop methods for their quantitation and measurement of hydrophobicity. Nonpolar species possessing polarizable electrons, such as PAHs, have been found to reside near the polar head groups rather than deep within the core of micelles. However, a precise location is impossible to establish, especially due to the fact that many of these solutes have dimensions which are comparable to those of micelles. 

From a statistical perspective, principal component analysis (PCA) is a method for reducing the dimensionality of data sets by transforming correlated variables into a smaller set of uncorrelated variables andfinding linear combinations of the original variables with maximum variability. 

The previously mentioned data set with a total of 115 compounds has already been studied by other statistical methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Linear Discriminant Analysis, and the Partial Least Squares (PLS) method [39]. Thus, the choice and selection of descriptors has already been accomplished. 

Multiple linear regression is strictly a parametric supervised learning technique. A parametric technique is one which assumes that the variables conform to some distribution (often the Gaussian distribution) the properties of the distribution are assumed in the underlying statistical method. A non-parametric technique does not rely upon the assumption of any particular distribution. A supervised learning method is one which uses information about the dependent variable to derive the model. An unsupervised learning method does not. Thus cluster analysis, principal components analysis and factor analysis are all examples of unsupervised learning techniques. 

We now consider a type of analysis in which the data (which may consist of solvent properties or of solvent effects on rates, equilibria, and spectra) again are expressed as a linear combination of products as in Eq. (8-81), but now the statistical treatment yields estimates of both a, and jc,. This method is called principal component analysis or factor analysis. A key difference between multiple linear regression analysis and principal component analysis (in the chemical setting) is that regression analysis adopts chemical models a priori, whereas in factor analysis the chemical significance of the factors emerges (if desired) as a result of the analysis. We will not explore the statistical procedure, but will cite some results. We have already encountered examples in Section 8.2 on the classification of solvents and in the present section in the form of the Swain et al. treatment leading to Eq. (8-74). 

The data from sensory evaluation and texture profile analysis of the jellies made with amidated pectin and sunflower pectin were subjected to Principal component analysis (PC) using the statistical software based on Jacobi method (Univac, 1973). The results of PC analysis are shown in figure 7. The plane of two principal components (F1,F2) explain 89,75 % of the variance contained in the original data. The attributes related with textural evaluation are highly correlated with the first principal component (Had.=0.95, Spr.=0.97, Che.=0.98, Gum.=0.95, Coe=0.98, HS=0.82 and SP=-0.93). As it could be expected, spreadability increases along the negative side of the axis unlike other textural parameters. 

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a statistical method having as its main purpose the representation in an economic way the location of the objects in a reduced coordinate system where only p axes instead of n axes corresponding to n variables (p[Pg.94]

According to Andersen [12] early applications of LLM are attributed to the Danish sociologist Rasch in 1963 and to Andersen himself. Later on, the approach has been described under many different names, such as spectral map analysis [13,14] in studies of drug specificity, as logarithmic analysis in the French statistical literature [15] and as the saturated RC association model [16]. The term log-bilinear model has been used by Escoufier and Junca [ 17]. In Chapter 31 on the analysis of measurement tables we have described the method under the name of log double-centred principal components analysis. 

However, there is a mathematical method for selecting those variables that best distinguish between formulations—those variables that change most drastically from one formulation to another and that should be the criteria on which one selects constraints. A multivariate statistical technique called principal component analysis (PCA) can effectively be used to answer these questions. PCA utilizes a variance-covariance matrix for the responses involved to determine their interrelationships. It has been applied successfully to this same tablet system by Bohidar et al. [18]. 

The authors wanted to select indicators that specifically tap melancholic depression. To evaluate this construct, a principal components analysis of the joint pool of K-SADS and BDI items was performed. Two independent statistical tests suggested a two-component solution, but the resulting components appeared to reflect method factors, rather than substantive factors. Specifically, all of the BDI items loaded on the first component (except for three items that did not load on either component) and nearly all of the K-SADS items loaded on the second component. In fact, the first component correlated. 98 with the BDI and the second component correlated. 93 with the K-SADS. Ambrosini et al., however, concluded that the first component reflected depression severity and the second component reflected melancholic depression. This interpretation was somewhat at odds with the data. Specifically, the second component included some K-SADS items that did not tap symptoms of melancholia (e.g., irritability and anger) and did not include some BDI items that measure symptoms of melancholia (e.g., loss of appetite). 

Computational methods have been applied to determine the connections in systems that are not well-defined by canonical pathways. This is either done by semi-automated and/or curated literature causal modeling [1] or by statistical methods based on large-scale data from expression or proteomic studies (a mostly theoretical approach is given by reference [2] and a more applied approach is in reference [3]). Many methods, including clustering, Bayesian analysis and principal component analysis have been used to find relationships and "fingerprints" in gene expression data [4]. 

Correlations are inherent in chemical processes even where it can be assumed that there is no correlation among the data. Principal component analysis (PCA) transforms a set of correlated variables into a new set of uncorrelated ones, known as principal components, and is an effective tool in multivariate data analysis. In the last section we describe a method that combines PCA and the steady-state data reconciliation model to provide sharper, and less confounding, statistical tests for gross errors. 

Finally, a method for dealing with the inherent correlation existing in chemical processes was discussed. This method combines principal component analysis (PCA) and the steady-state data reconciliation model to provide sharper and less confounding statistical tests for gross errors. 

Solvent selection based on cohesion parameters, like those of Hansen [12], and by multivariate statistical methods like principal components analysis are two potential methods that can be used for solvent selection. These effects will be examined further in section 3.6.1. 

Chapter 3 starts with the first and probably most important multivariate statistical method, with principal component analysis (PC A). PC A is mainly used for mapping or summarizing the data information. Many ideas presented in this chapter, like the selection of the number of principal components (PCs), or the robustification of PCA, apply in a similar way to other methods. Section 3.8 discusses briefly related methods for summarizing and mapping multivariate data. The interested reader may consult extended literature for a more detailed description of these methods. 

Cluster analysis is far from an automatic technique each stage of the process requires many decisions and therefore close supervision by the analyst. It is imperative that the procedure be as interactive as possible. Therefore, for this study, a menu-driven interactive statistical package was written for PDP-11 and VAX (VMS and UNIX) series computers, which includes adequate computer graphics capabilities. The graphical output includes a variety of histograms and scatter plots based on the raw data or on the results of principal-components analysis or canonical-variates analysis (14). Hierarchical cluster trees are also available. All of the methods mentioned in this study were included as an integral part of the package. 

Evaluation of the statistical properties is a fundamental part of any statistical analysis and here we concentrated on the distribution of each variable. To reduce the dimensionality of this data set we used principal component analysis (PCA) to explore the covariance structure of these data and to reduce the variables to a more manageable number (PAl method with no rotation, 21). 

In the past few years, PLS, a multiblock, multivariate regression model solved by partial least squares found its application in various fields of chemistry (1-7). This method can be viewed as an extension and generalization of other commonly used multivariate statistical techniques, like regression solved by least squares and principal component analysis. PLS has several advantages over the ordinary least squares solution therefore, it becomes more and more popular in solving regression models in chemical problems. 

---