Standard mixtures, laboratory preparation

The preparation of standards for the analysis of VOCs does present difficulties for many laboratories. Firstly, the common use of many solvents in laboratories means that contamination and high blanks are real problems. The analytical techniques used are highly sensitive, standard solutions are usually prepared in methanol, and therefore absorption of atmospheric contaminants readily occurs. Secondly, the volatile nature of the components may make quantitative transfer susceptible to losses. For these reasons, and because of the large number of components involved, many laboratories prefer to buy in solutions of standard mixtures, which are usually prepared gravimetrically under clean conditions. However, laboratories need to check the accuracy of such solutions, usually by comparison to solutions from other suppliers and by means of proficiency schemes, and take care to minimise evaporative losses over the time-scale of use. 

The experimental aqueous matrices included deionized-distilled water, laboratory-prepared phosphate buffer solutions, U.S. mean water (1), and tap waters. U.S. mean water is a solution of specified mineral content which may be prepared and used as a reference standard. These aqueous systems were supplemented with known quantities of Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Pd, Ni, Ca, Mg, and K singly and in mixtures. Cations with the exception oiF Fe and K were added as nitrates. Fe and K were added as chlorides. The freezing rate is controlled by the vessel rotation rate and bath temperature. Specific conductance is used as an indicator of the dissolved sohds concentration, although it is recognized that this property is influenced by the hydrogen ion concentration as well as the nature of the dissolved constituents. 

The accuracy of measurements is the quality criterion most difficult to determine (see Chapter 1). However meticulously prepared the standards might be, the voliunetric loops prepared and calibrated, and however carefully other easily identified sources of systematic errors are taken into accoimt, there are no direct measurements or calculations of the analytical accmacy. Intercomparison with other laboratories, exchange of standard mixtures, etc., give some indication of the correct concentration range. In international work, the demands are about twice the reproducibility limits, Le., within 2-5 %. Such demands necessitate the exchange of highly reliable standard mixtures which are difficult to prepare and expensive to purchase. For halocarbon studies others than tracer work and data collection for international data inventories the demands are less stringent. 

Standards with known additive loadings are required to calibrate in-polymer analysis techniques. In the laboratory preparation of standards, it is extremely important to refer to the actual materials used in the formulation of the final product rather than ultra pure grades of chemicals. In the selection of mixtures to be used as standards all component levels should be evenly represented in the calibration blends, in order to avoid one component from dominating the spectral information for quantitative measurements. The precision of standard mixtures generally needs to be better than that of the analytical system being developed. Preparation of good calibration standards and the choice of a suitable internal standard are of cmcial importance for quantitation of polymer additives. 

The composition vaiues recorded In this table are offered as a guide to laboratories preparing their own mixtures from pure hydrocarbons or to oommercial supplers of standards. In either case, an accurate composition of the standards must be known to analyst. 

The accuracy of an analytical method is given by the extent by which the value obtained deviates from the true value. One estimation of the accuracy of a method entails analyzing a sample with known concentration and then comparing the results between the measured and the true value. The second approach is to compare test results obtained from the new method to the results obtained from an existing method known to be accurate. Other approaches are based on determinations of the per cent recovery of known analyte spiked into blank matrices or products (i.e., the standard addition method). For samples spiked into blank matrices, it is recommended to prepare the sample at five different concentration levels, ranging over 80-120%, or 75-125%, of the target concentration. These preparations used for accuracy studies usually called synthetic mixtures or laboratory-made preparations . 

Raman often is evaluated as an alternative to an existing high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method because of its potential to be noninvasive, fast, simple to perform, and solvent-free. Raman was compared to HPLC for the determination of ticlopidine-hydrochloride (TCL) [43], risperidone [44] in film-coated tablets, and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in 150-mg/mL suspensions (DepoProvera, Pfizer) [45] it was found to have numerous advantages and performance suitable to replace HPLC. In an off-line laboratory study, the relative standard deviation of the measurement of the composition of powder mixtures of two sulfonamides, sulfathiazole and sulfanilamide, was reduced from 10-20% to less than 4% by employing a reusable, easily prepared rotating sample cell [46]. 

Equipment needed for the above procedures is not always available in the standard laboratory. A useful and widely used method for preparing solutions of dinitrogen pentoxide in nitric acid involves the distillation of mixtures of oleum and potassium nitrate in absolute nitric acid. Another method uses a solution of sulfur trioxide and ammonium nitrate in nitric acid. Although the original report states that solutions of 28 2 % dinitrogen pentoxide in nitric acid can be prepared via this method, a later report suggests that concentrations higher than 30 % are not attainable. 

The use of standard solutions, reference standards, and quality control samples, whether prepared by the laboratory or purchased commercially, is essential to valid analyses of test and control article/carrier mixtures and biological fluids (blood, serum, plasma, etc). 

The first company based upon applied biocatalysis also dates back to the 19 century. In 1874 Christian Hansen started a company in Copenhagen, Denmark. His company— named Christian Hansen s Laboratory to this day—was the first in the industrial market with a standardized enzyme preparation, rennet, for cheese making. Rennet, a mixture of chymosin (also called rennin) and pepsin, was and still is obtained by salt extraction of the fonrth stomach of suckling calves. 

In addition, if each calibration sample contains only one analyte, then R contains already the spectra of the pure components and C K x K) is a diagonal matrix (i.e. non-zero values only in the main diagonal). Hence eqn (3.20) simply calculates S by dividing the spectrum of each pure calibration sample by its analyte concentration. To obtain a better estimate of S, the number of calibration samples is usually larger than the number of components, so eqn (3.19) is used. We still have two further requirements in order to use the previous equations. First, the relative amounts of constituents in at least K calibration samples must change from one sample to another. This means that, unlike the common practice in laboratories when the calibration standards are prepared, the dilutions of one concentrated calibration sample carmot be used alone. Second, in order to obtain the necessary number of linearly independent equations, the number of wavelengths must be equal to or larger than the number of constituents in the mixtures (7>A). Usually the entire spectrum is used. 

There are four basic system types. Type I are basic isocratic systems used for simple, routine analysis in a QA/QC environment often for fingerprinting mixtures or final product for impurity/yield checking. Type II systems are flexible research gradient systems used for methods development, complex gradients, and dial-mix isocratics for routine analysis and standards preparation. They fit the most common need for an HPLC system. Type III systems are fully automated, dedicated systems used for cost-per-test, round-the-clock analysis of a variety of gradient and isocratic samples typical of clinical and environmental analysis laboratories. Type TV systems are fully automated gra-... 

NPL, in line with other national standards laboratories, retains its primary standard gas mixtures (PSMs) in-house. These primary standards are disseminated, however, through different types of calibration gas mixtures. These disseminated standards are known at NPL as Primary Reference Gas Mixtures , Secondary Gas Standards and Certified Gas Mixtures . An NPL leaflet has been prepared which explains the differences between these types of traceable standards and which also explains the relationship of these with the different types of standards produced by other national metrology institutes (NMIs). The main type of gas standards disseminated by NPL, are however, secondary gas standards and the procedures used for preparing and certifying these are outlined below. 

---