Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

SS approach

We must, finally, mention the SS approaches that employ a genuine MR SU CC formalism, yet focus on one state at a time by neglecting the coupling with other states. Such an approach was pursued earlier by Kucharski and Bartlett [98] and, most recently by Mukherjee and collaborators [99,100], who distinguish the relaxed and nonrelaxed versions of their formalism. [Pg.27]

The SS approaches, proposed by Mukherjee s group [99,100], in either relaxed or nonrelaxed version, also lead to much improved potentials, at least for the lowest energy level. Unfortunately, we are not aware of any information concerning their performance for the excited states of the same symmetry species as the lowest level state, either for the H4 model or other species that the authors considered. [Pg.39]

The state-specific method solves the nonlinear Schrodinger equation for the state of interest (ground and excited state) usually within a multirefence approach (Cl, MCSCF or CASSCF descriptions), and it postulates that the transition energies are differences between the corresponding values of the free energy functional, the basic energetic quantity of the QM continuum models. The nonlinear character of the reaction potential requires the introduction in the SS approaches of an iteration procedure not present in parallel calculations on isolated systems. [Pg.114]

A different analysis applies to the LR approach (in either Tamm-Dancoff, Random Phase Approximation, or Time-dependent DFT version) where the excitation energies are directly determined as singularities of the frequency-dependent linear response functions of the solvated molecule in the ground state, and thus avoiding explicit calculation of the excited state wave function. In this case, the iterative scheme of the SS approaches is no longer necessary, and the whole spectrum of excitation energies can be obtained in a single run as for isolated systems. [Pg.114]

In this model (Table 3), substrate, A, is transformed to product, B, by an enzyme, E. The supply of A is large, ensuring far-from-equilibrium conditions. An intermediate, X, is produced autocatalytically, and degraded by the enzyme. (This feature of the model makes it unrealistic, as few autocatalytic processes arise this way.) The steady-state equation for X is cubic, and has three roots, or solutions for certain values of the parameters. One of the solutions is unstable a real system cannot maintain a steady-state concentration, [X]ss, with a value corresponding to this solution. Therefore, before [X]ss approaches such a value too closely, it jumps to a different value, corresponding to one of the stable solutions. This behavior leads, to hysteresis, as shown in Fig. 1. [Pg.6]

The SS approach uses a different effective Hamiltonian 77eff (2.2) for each electronic excited state by calculating Va with the corresponding electron density (i.e., density matrix). The nonlinear character of Va is solved through an iterative procedure [13,14], in which at each iteration, the solvent-induced component of the effective Hamiltonian is computed with the apparent charges determined from the standard ASC-BEM equation by exploiting the first order density matrix of the preceding step. [Pg.24]

On the other hand, most of the above deficiencies are not present in SS approaches, as SS-PCM/TD-DFT, which instead gives a balanced description of strong and weak electronic transitions (see also the results reported below). Several studies (see below) indicate that SS-PCM/TD-DFT provides accurate estimates of dynamical solvent effects on the absorption and emission processes, of solvent reorganization energy, and thus of inhomogeneous broadening. For example, in SS-PCM/TD-DFT 1 is indeed proportional to the square of the dipole moment shift associated with the transition, which is indeed expected to be the leading term in a polar solvent [85,86]. [Pg.57]

The problem of the description of the excited states within the Polarizable Continuum Model leads to two non-equivalent approaches, the approach based on the linear response (LR) approach, and the state specific (SS) approach, as already said in the Introduction. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages. The LR approach is computationally more convenient, as it gives the whole spectrum of the excited states of interest in a single calculation, but is physically biased. In fact, in the LR approach the solute-solvent interaction contains a term related to the one-particle transition densities of the solute connecting the reference state adopted in the LR calculation, which usually corresponds to the electronic groimd state, to the excited electronic state. The SS approach is computationally more expensive, as it requires a separate calculation for each of the excited states of interest, but is physically im-biased. In fact, in the SS approach the solute-solvent interaction is determined by the effective one-particle electron density of the excited state. [Pg.1058]

The J function is plotted in Fig. 16-28 and tables are available (e.g., Sherwood et al., Ma.ss Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975). Ver-meulen et al. (gen. refs.) discuss several approximations of the J function. For large arguments it approaches... [Pg.1528]

Azinomycins A and B (64 and 65 Scheme 11.5) [115, 116] were isolated in 1986 from Streptomyces griseofuscus at the SS pharmaceutical company in Japan and were found to have potent in vitro cytotoxicities [117] and to display significant in vivo antitumor activity [118]. Since their discovery [117] and structure determination [119], their unusual molecular framework has attracted the attention of many chemists interested in their mode of action and in developing synthetic approaches to them [115,116]. The first total synthesis of azinomycin A was achieved in 2000 by Coleman et al. [120]. [Pg.414]

Danishefsky and coworkers using the same approach have synthesized substituted cyclohexadienones 563s65,666 (equation 361). A highly stereoselective (96%) cycloaddition of diastereoisomerically pure (Ss)-menthyl 3-(3-trifluoromethylpyrid-2-ylsulphinyl)acrylate 564 to 2-methoxyfuran 565 leads to the cycloadduct 566 which was elaborated by Koizumi and coworkers to glyoxalase I inhibitor 567667 (equation 362). [Pg.359]

Abt M, Lim Y-B, Sacks J, Xie M, Young SS. A sequential approach for identifying lead compounds in large chemical databases. Stat Sci 2001 16 154-68. [Pg.440]

Thus the method allowed precise information on the micro-homogeneity of formerly and more recently prepared materials that could not be obtained with most classical analytical approaches. The limitation of SS-ZAAS, however, because of its... [Pg.35]

Berman SS, Sturgeon RE (1988) A new approach to the preparation of biological reference materials for trace metals. Fresenius Z Anal Chem 332 546-548. [Pg.43]

Such techniques imply analysis of chemical products of photolysis. Application of mass-spectrometers of various types is often hampered by a number of circumstances. These difficulties will be discussed later on. The EPR method, which is currently the most extensively employed technique, features low sensitivity and is usually used for analysis of primary fragments of photolysis. For this purpose, the radicals produced are frozen on the walls of a quartz pin and are thus accumulated inside the device. On one hand, this approach allows one to overcome the sensitivity threshold of the device. However, on the other hand, this excludes the possibility of direct kinetic measurements. The SS technique permits the use of weak light sources for detecting active particles under... [Pg.226]

FIGURE 65-1. Sickle gene inheritance scheme for both parents with sickle cell trait (SCT). A, normal hemoglobin S, sickle hemoglobin. Possibilities with each pregnancy 25% normal (AA) 50% SCT (AS) 25% sickle cell anemia (SS). (From Chan CYJ, Moore R. Sickle cell disease. In DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, et al, (eds.) Pharmacotherapy A Pathophysiologic Approach. 6th ed. New York McGraw-Hill 2005 1856.)... [Pg.1004]

Application to solid polymer/additive formulations is restricted, for obvious reasons. SS-ETV-ICP-MS (cup-in-tube) has been used for the simultaneous determination of four elements (Co, Mn, P and Ti) with very different furnace characteristics in mg-size PET samples [413]. The results were compared to ICP-AES (after sample dissolution) and XRF. Table 8.66 shows the very good agreement between the various analytical approaches. The advantage of directly introducing the solid sample in an ETV device is also clearly shown by the fact that the detection limit is even better than that reported for ICP-HRMS. The technique also enables speciation of Sb in PET, and the determination of various sulfur species in aramide fibres. ETV offers some advantages over the well-established specific sulfur analysers very low sample consumption the possibility of using an aqueous standard for calibration and the flexibility to carry out the determination of other analytes. The method cannot be considered as very economic. [Pg.658]


See other pages where SS approach is mentioned: [Pg.181]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.748]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.746]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.778]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.231]   


SEARCH



Barrett s approaches

Bondi s approach

Cioslowski’s approach

Marazano’s biomimetic approach

Merrifield’s approach

Miedema’s approach

Miller’s hydroxamate approach

Mulliken’s approach

Onsager’s approach

Rayleigh’s approach

Robinson’s approach

S-R approach

Taguchi’s approach to experimental

Taguchi’s approach to experimental design

© 2024 chempedia.info