Linear response functions

Linear response function approaches were introduced into the chemistry literature about thirty years ago Ref. [1,2]. At that time they were referred to as Green functions or propagator approaches. Soon after the introduction it became apparent that they offered a viable and attractive alternative to the state specific approaches for obtaining molecular properties as excitation energies, transition moments and second order molecular properties. 

Koch H, Jensen HJA, Jorgensen P, Helgaker T (1990) Excitation-energies from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function (CCSDLR) - applications to be, CH+, CO, and H2O. J Chem Phys 93 3345... 

Controlled potential methods have been successfully applied to ion-selective electrodes. The term voltammetric ion-selective electrode (VISE) was suggested by Cammann [60], Senda and coworkers called electrodes placed under constant potential conditions amperometric ion-selective electrodes (AISE) [61, 62], Similarly to controlled current methods potentiostatic techniques help to overcome two major drawbacks of classic potentiometry. First, ISEs have a logarithmic response function, which makes them less sensitive to the small change in activity of the detected analyte. Second, an increased charge of the detected ions leads to the reduction of the response slope and, therefore, to the loss of sensitivity, especially in the case of large polyionic molecules. Due to the underlying response mechanism voltammetric ISEs yield a linear response function that is not as sensitive to the charge of the ion. 

Further improvement of the low detection limit was achieved using stripping voltammetry based on facilitated heparin adsorption and desorption [66], Stripping voltammetry yielded a detection limit of 0.13 U mL 1 in sheep blood plasma, which is lower than therapeutic heparin concentrations (>0.2 U mL-1). A linear response function in the range of 0.2-6 U mL 1 was observed. The authors also found that blood polypeptides and lipids with a mass above 25 000 significantly interfered with heparin detection, perhaps by hindrance of a charge transfer reaction at the interface. 

Other statistical parameters that can be used include examination of residuals and the output from the ANOVA table of regression statistics. This may indicate that a non-linear response function should be checked [9]. 

In this equation AN, ANs, and Av(r) are the changes with respect to each variable in the expansion x°(r, r ) is the linear response function at the reference ground state, and the other quantities have been already defined in the previous section the upper index 0 indicates that all reactivity indexes are evaluated at the reference state. 

The second term in Equation 10.33 implies to evaluate a nonlocal quantity, y(r, r ) the linear response function depends on two different points within the molecule. 

Chemical hardness Electronic Fukui function./ /) Linear response function... 

The calculation of frequency-dependent linear-response properties may be an expensive task, since first-order response equations have to be solved for each considered frequency [1]. The cost may be reduced by introducing the Cauchy expansion in even powers of the frequency for the linear-response function [2], The expansion coefficients, or Cauchy moments [3], are frequency independent and need to be calculated only once for a given property. The Cauchy expansion is valid only for the frequencies below the first pole of the linear-response function. 

For the non-variational CC wavefunctions, the polarizability is the negative of the linear-response function and may therefore be identified as the second... 

Since the Cauchy moments formula, equation (20), has the same structure as the CC linear-response function, equation (4), the contractions in equation (30) may be implemented by a straightforward generalization of the computational procedures described in Section III B of Ref. [21] for the calculation of the CC3 linear-response function. 

The paramagnetic contribution can be defined as the linear response function or polarization propagator [17]... 

In this chapter, we therefore consider whether it is possible to eliminate spin-orbit coupling from four-component relativistic calculations. This is a situation quite different from that of more approximate relativistic methods where a considerable effort is required for the inclusion of spin-orbit coupling. We have previously shown that it is indeed possible to eliminate spin-orbit coupling from the calculation of spectroscopic constants [12,13]. In this chapter, we consider the extension of the previous result to the calculation of second-order electric and magnetic properties, i.e., linear response functions. Although the central question of this article may seem somewhat technical, it will be seen that its consideration throws considerable light on the fundamental interactions in molecular systems. We will even claim that four-component relativistic theory is the optimal framework for the understanding of such interactions since they are inherently relativistic. 

They reduce to regular energy derivatives in the static limit [48,50]. The linear response function... 

Polarization propagators or linear response functions are normally not calculated from their spectral representation but from an alternative matrix representation [25,46-48] which avoids the explicit calculation of the excited states. 

The charge-density susceptibility is a linear response function it is nonlocal because a perturbing potential applied at any point r affects the charge density throughoutthe molecule. Quantum mechanically,x(r, r co) is specified by (2)... 

Static charge-density susceptibilities have been computed ab initio by Li et al (38). The frequency-dependent susceptibility x(r, r cd) can be calculated within density functional theory, using methods developed by Ando (39 Zang-will and Soven (40 Gross and Kohn (4I and van Gisbergen, Snijders, and Baerends (42). In ab initio work, x(r, r co) can be determined by use of time-dependent perturbation techniques, pseudo-state methods (43-49), quantum Monte Carlo calculations (50-52), or by explicit construction of the linear response function in coupled cluster theory (53). Then the imaginary-frequency susceptibility can be obtained by analytic continuation from the susceptibility at real frequencies, or by a direct replacement co ico, where possible (for example, in pseudo-state expressions). 

Within the Thomas-Fermi approximation, the linear response function is independent of the wavevector q, since from eqn (6.20) it is given by... 

The wave vector dependence of the linear response function, x(q), may be found by using perturbation theory to evaluate the change in the electronic density in the presence of the weakly perturbing potential... 

It follows from the definition of the linear response function in eqn (6.22) that... 

Fig. 6.2 The coordinate system chosen for evaluating the linear response function, the integration being with respect to whilst q is kept fixed.

One special type of optimization problem involving restrictions or constraints has been solved quite successfully by a technique known as linear programming. From a mathematical viewpoint the basic form of the problem may be stated very briefly. Consider a linear response function of n variables ... 

The classical linear response function can be written using the fluctuation-dissipation theorem as a single term,... 

In this contribution, the experimental concept and a phenomenological description of signal generation in TDFRS will first be developed. Then, some experiments on simple liquids will be discussed. After the extension of the model to polydisperse solutes, TDFRS will be applied to polymer analysis, where the quantities of interest are diffusion coefficients, molar mass distributions and molar mass averages. In the last chapter of this article, it will be shown how pseudostochastic noise-like excitation patterns can be employed in TDFRS for the direct measurement of the linear response function and for the selective excitation of certain frequency ranges of interest by means of tailored pseudostochastic binary sequences. 

T = Tth S0, and all information about the sample is contained within the memory or linear response function... 

In the following, a general treatment of arbitrary binary excitation sequences will be given. Since the proper definition of the excitation and the response function is not unambiguously possible, a problem-independent notation will first be given, which will later be mapped to the actual experiment. For the moment, it is sufficient to picture a linear system with an input x(t), an output y(t) and a linear response function h(t), as sketched in Fig. 22. The input x(t) may be a pulse of finite duration, as discussed in the previous sections, or a pseudostochastic random binary sequence as in Fig. 22. 

Now, the effective linear response function h(t) can be identified with g(t) as defined in Eqs. (25) and (29) h(t) = g(t). The primary sample response is the heterodyne diffraction efficiencyy (t) = Chet(t)- The instantaneous contribution of the temperature grating to the diffraction efficiency is expressed by the 5-function in g(t) [Eq. (25)]. After the sample, an unavoidable noise term e(t) is added. The continuous yff) is sampled by integrating with an ideal detector over time intervals At to finally obtain the time-discrete sequence y[n]. 

---