Spectroscope/spectrometer

Technology developments are revolutionizing the spectroscopic capabilities at THz frequencies. While no one teclmique is ideal for all applications, both CW and pulsed spectrometers operating at or near the fiindamental limits imposed by quantum mechanics are now within reach. Compact, all-solid-state implementations will soon allow such spectrometers to move out of the laboratory and into a wealth of field and remote-sensing applications. From the study of the rotational motions of light molecules to the large-amplitude vibrations of... 

Probably the simplest mass spectrometer is the time-of-fiight (TOP) instrument [36]. Aside from magnetic deflection instruments, these were among the first mass spectrometers developed. The mass range is theoretically infinite, though in practice there are upper limits that are governed by electronics and ion source considerations. In chemical physics and physical chemistry, TOP instniments often are operated at lower resolving power than analytical instniments. Because of their simplicity, they have been used in many spectroscopic apparatus as detectors for electrons and ions. Many of these teclmiques are included as chapters unto themselves in this book, and they will only be briefly described here. 

Time-of-flight mass spectrometers have been used as detectors in a wider variety of experiments tlian any other mass spectrometer. This is especially true of spectroscopic applications, many of which are discussed in this encyclopedia. Unlike the other instruments described in this chapter, the TOP mass spectrometer is usually used for one purpose, to acquire the mass spectrum of a compound. They caimot generally be used for the kinds of ion-molecule chemistry discussed in this chapter, or structural characterization experiments such as collision-induced dissociation. Plowever, they are easily used as detectors for spectroscopic applications such as multi-photoionization (for the spectroscopy of molecular excited states) [38], zero kinetic energy electron spectroscopy [39] (ZEKE, for the precise measurement of ionization energies) and comcidence measurements (such as photoelectron-photoion coincidence spectroscopy [40] for the measurement of ion fragmentation breakdown diagrams). 

It is only since 1980 that in situ spectroscopic techniques have been developed to obtain identification of the adsorbed intermediates and hence of reliable reaction mechanisms. These new infrared spectroscopic in situ techniques, such as electrochemically modulated infrared reflectance spectroscopy (EMIRS), which uses a dispersive spectrometer, Fourier transform infrared reflectance spectroscopy, or a subtractively normalized interfacial Fourier transform infrared reflectance spectroscopy (SNIFTIRS), have provided definitive proof for the presence of strongly adsorbed species (mainly adsorbed carbon monoxide) acting as catalytic poisons. " " Even though this chapter is not devoted to the description of in situ infrared techniques, it is useful to briefly note the advantages and limitations of such spectroscopic methods. 

Specifications for modem detectors in HPLC are given by Hanai [538] and comprise spectroscopic detectors (UV, F, FUR, Raman, RID, ICP, AAS, AES), electrochemical detectors (polarography, coulometry, (pulsed) amperometry, conductivity), mass spectromet-ric and other devices (FID, ECD, ELSD, ESR, NMR). None of these detectors meets all the requirement criteria of Table 4.40. The four most commonly used HPLC detectors are UV (80%), electrochemical, fluorescence and refractive index detectors. As these detectors are several orders of magnitude less sensitive than their GC counterparts, sensor contamination is not so severe, and... 

Principles and Characteristics Extraction or dissolution methods are usually followed by a separation technique prior to subsequent analysis or detection. While coupling of a sample preparation and a chromatographic separation technique is well established (Section 7.1), hyphenation to spectroscopic analysis is more novel and limited. By elimination of the chromatographic column from the sequence precol-umn-column-postcolumn, essentially a chemical sensor remains which ensures short total analysis times (1-2 min). Examples are headspace analysis via a sampling valve or direct injection of vapours into a mass spectrometer (TD-MS see also Section 6.4). In... 

In a typical MIP-MS instrument, the ICP portion is replaced with one of a variety of microwave discharge sources, usually a fairly standardised (modified) Beenakker cavity connected to a microwave generator. The analytical MIP at intermediate power (<500 W) is a small and quiet plasma source compared with the ICP. The mass spectrometer needs no major modifications for it to be interfaced with the MIP. With MIP used as a spectroscopic radiation source, typically consisting of a capillary (1mm i.d.), a power of 30-50 W and a gas flow below 1 L min 1, multi-element determinations are possible. By applying electrodeposition on graphite electrodes, ultratrace element determinations are within reach, e.g. pg amounts of Hg. 

Mass spectrometry is the only universal multielement method which allows the determination of all elements and their isotopes in both solids and liquids. Detection limits for virtually all elements are low. Mass spectrometry can be more easily applied than other spectroscopic techniques as an absolute method, because the analyte atoms produce the analytical signal themselves, and their amount is not deduced from emitted or absorbed radiation the spectra are simple compared to the line-rich spectra often found in optical emission spectrometry. The resolving power of conventional mass spectrometers is sufficient to separate all isotope signals, although expensive instruments and skill are required to eliminate interferences from molecules and polyatomic cluster ions. 

Several authors [386,387] have discussed the spectroscopic and nonspectroscopic (matrix) interferences in ICP-MS. ICP-MS is more susceptible to nonspectroscopic matrix interferences than ICP-AES [388-390]. Matrix interferences are perceptible by suppression and (sometimes) enhancement of the analyte signal. This enhanced susceptibility has to be related to the use of the mass spectrometer as a detection system. In fact, since both techniques use the same (or comparable) sample introduction systems (nebulisers, spray chambers, etc.) and argon plasmas (torches, generators, etc.), it is reasonable to assume that, as far as these parts are concerned, interferences are comparable. The most severe limitation of ICP-MS consists of polyatomic... 

---