Special case binary mixing

The conservative mixing of two components requires linear relationships for every pair of species. We take two end-members j = a and j = fi and note the bulk system 

When component and mixture concentrations of any species i are known, mass proportions can be calculated from the lever rule  

The Meurthe river in North-Eastern France has two major tributaries, the Fave and Mortagne rivers. Let R be the concentration of an element in the main Meurthe river and r that of the same element in its tributaries (Table 1.1, columns 2 and 3). 65 percent of fine-grained sediments from the Upper Meurthe (R0) mix with 35 percent sediment from the Fave (r0) river. At the next confluent, 80 percent of the Meurthe fine-grained sediments mix with 20 percent Mortagne (r2) sediment. Find the composition of the sediments in the Meurthe down each tributary. 

Written in a symbolic way, the mass balance equations read 

The parent magma is the combination of the residual liquid and olivine, hence 

---

These equations are used whenever we need an expression for the chemical potential of a strong electrolyte in solution. We have based the development only on a binary system. The equations are exactly the same when several strong electrolytes are present as solutes. In such cases the chemical potential of a given solute is a function of the molalities of all solutes through the mean activity coefficients. In general the reference state is defined as the solution in which the molality of all solutes is infinitesimally small. In special cases a mixed solvent consisting of the pure solvent and one or more solutes at a fixed molality may be used. The reference state in such cases is the infinitely dilute solution of all solutes except those whose concentrations are kept constant. Again, when two or more substances, pure or mixed, may be considered as solvents, a choice of solvent must be made and clearly stated. 

In steps (1) and (2), S and I compete for (sites on) E to form the binary complexes ES and ET. In steps (3) and (4), the ternary complex EIS is formed from the binary complexes. In steps (5) and (6), ES and EIS form the product P if EIS is inactive, step (6) is ignored. Various special cases of competitive, noncompetitive, and mixed (competitive and noncompetitive) inhibition may be deduced from this general scheme, according to the steps allowed, and corresponding rate laws obtained. 

Thermodynamic definitions show that the first term of Eq. (1) is the enthalpy of mixing, AHu, while the second term is the negative of the excess entropy of mixing, ASm, multiplied by T. When all four parameters are zero, the liquid is ideal with a zero enthalpy and excess entropy of mixing. What has been called the quasiregular model, a = b = 0, has been used by Panish and Ilegems (1972) to fit the liquidus lines of a number of III—V binary compounds. The particular extension of this special case of Eq. (1) to a ternary liquid given by... 

Types of Phases in Binary Systems.—A two-component system, like a system with a single component, can exist in solid, liquid, and gaseous phases. The gas phase, of course, is perfectly simple it is simply a mixture of the gas phases of the two components. Our treatment of chemical equilibrium in gases, in Chap. X, includes this as a special case. Any two gases can mix in any proportions in a stable way, so long as they cannot react chemically, and we shall assume only the simple case where the two components do not react in the gaseous phase. 

Perhaps the most important term in Eq. (5.2-3) is the liquid-phase activity coefficient, and methods for its prediction have been developed in maiiy forms and by many workers. For binary systems the Van Laar (Eq. (1.4-18)], Wilson [Eq. (1.4-23)], NRTL (Eq. (1.4-27)], and UmQUAC [Eq. (t.4-3ti)] relationships are useful for predicting liqnid-iffiase nonidealities, but they require some experimental data. When no dim are available, and an approximate nonideality correction will suffice, the UNIFAC approach (Eq. (1.4-31)], which utilizes functional group contributions, may be used. For special cases involving regular solutions (no excess entropy of mixing), the Scatchard-Hildebrand method provides liquid-phase activity coefficients based on easily obtained pure-component properties. 

In some special cases (eg. a mixed binary solvent with one component very active, and the second one of low activity), an increase of temperature leads to coil-helix transition. E[Pg.756]

Integer programming (IP) corresponds to a special case of LP in which the decision variables can take only integer values. When values are also limited to 0 and 1, we talk of binary integer programming. Moreover, there are also mixed models in which some variables are integers and others are continuous. 

Some special cases such as mixed systems (binary suspensions, competitive systems, and ternary surface complexes) and effects going beyond that of simple adsorption (i.e., surface precipitation) as well as temperature effects are shortly addressed in a supplementary section. 

Special care has to be taken if the polymer is only soluble in a solvent mixture or if a certain property, e.g., a definite value of the second virial coefficient, needs to be adjusted by adding another solvent. In this case the analysis is complicated due to the different refractive indices of the solvent components [32]. In case of a binary solvent mixture we find, that formally Equation (42) is still valid. The refractive index increment needs to be replaced by an increment accounting for a complex formation of the polymer and the solvent mixture, when one of the solvents adsorbs preferentially on the polymer. Instead of measuring the true molar mass Mw the apparent molar mass Mapp is measured. How large the difference is depends on the difference between the refractive index increments ([dn/dc) — (dn/dc)A>0. (dn/dc)fl is the increment determined in the mixed solvents in osmotic equilibrium, while (dn/dc)A0 is determined for infinite dilution of the polymer in solvent A. For clarity we omitted the fixed parameters such as temperature, T, and pressure, p. 

Yet more important was the publication by Schottky and Wagner (1930) of their classical paper on the statistical thermodynamics of real crystals (41). This clarified the role of intrinsic lattice disorder as the equilibrium state of the stoichiometric crystal above 0° K. and led logically to the deduction that equilibrium between the crystal of an ordered mixed phase—i.e., a binary compound of ionic, covalent, or metallic type—and its components was statistical, not unique and determinate as is that of a molecular compound. As the consequence of a statistical thermodynamic theorem this proposition should be generally valid. The stoichiometrically ideal crystal has no special status, but the extent to which different substances may display a detectable variability of composition must depend on the energetics of each case—in particular, on the energetics of lattice disorder and of valence change. This point is taken up below, for it is fundamental to the problems that have to be considered. 

Only one simple case of the binary system (A -f B) with eutectic crystallization and no region of the mixed crystal existence (Daniels and Alberty, 1975) will be, considered here as an example of liquid-crystal phase separation (see Figure 1.11). This kind of ph2isc separation is of special importance for polymer systems as most tj pical. 

As with the example presented for cosolvency in the case of polymer solutions in mixed solvents (Fig. 27), the origin of cosolvency for polymer blends in a common solvent can be interpreted as a dissection of a miscibility gap that would normally bridge the Gibbs phase triangle from one binary subsystem to the other binary system (here from 1/B to A/B) by special interactiMis between the completely miscible components (here 1/A). With the example of Fig. 32, the thermodynamic quality of the solvent for polymer A is almost marginal in this manner polymer B becomes completely miscible with certain solutions of polymer A in solvent 1. 

---