Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrostatic sorption

Sorption of nonionic, nonpolar hydrophobic compounds occurs by weak attractive interactions such as van der Waals forces. Net attraction is the result of dispersion forces the strength of these weak forces is about 4 to 8 kj/mol ( 1 2 kcal/mol). Electrostatic interactions can also be important, especially when a molecule is polar in nature. Attraction potential can develop between polar molecules and the heterogeneous sod surface that has ionic and polar sites, resulting in stronger sorption. [Pg.221]

In the absence of dyes, APA- and AdPA-grafted silica bind La(III) with, respectively, 0.20 and 0.27 mmol/g sorption capacity, resulting in formation of 1 2 (La L) complexes. 50% of introduced cation is bonded at pH=5 (APA), pH=6.1 (AdPA) and complete adsorption occurs at pH=6 (APA), pH=6.5 (AdPA). The grafted support in absence of La adsorbs the chosen dyes at pH<4 due to the electrostatic interaction with the -NH, groups on the surface, present as a result of grafting procedure. The adsorption of dyes at pH>4 is insignificant. [Pg.43]

The (I)-(III)-samples sorption ability investigation for cationic dyes microamounts has shown that for DG the maximum rate of extraction is within 70-90 % at pH 3. The isotherm of S-type proves the physical character of solution process and a seeming ionic exchange. Maximal rate of F extraction for all samples was 40-60 % at pH 8 due to electrostatic forces. The anionic dyes have more significant affinity to surface researching Al Oj-samples comparatively with cationic. The forms of obtained soi ption isotherms atpH have mixed character of H,F-type chemosorption mechanism of fonuation of a primary monolayer with the further bilayers formation due to H-bonds and hydrophobic interactions. The different values of pH p for sorbents and dyes confirm their multifunctional character and distinctions in the acid-base properties of adsoi ption centers. [Pg.266]

High sorption capacities with respect to protein macromolecules are observed when highly permeable macro- and heteroreticular polyelectrolytes (biosorbents) are used. In buffer solutions a typical picture of interaction between ions with opposite charges fixed on CP and counterions in solution is observed. As shown in Fig. 13, in the acid range proteins are not bonded by carboxylic CP because the ionization of their ionogenic groups is suppressed. The amount of bound protein decreases at high pH values of the solution because dipolar ions proteins are transformed into polyanions and electrostatic repulsion is operative. The sorption maximum is either near the isoelectric point of the protein or depends on the ratio of the pi of the protein to the pKa=0 5 of the carboxylic polyelectrolyte [63]. It should be noted that this picture may be profoundly affected by the mechanism of interaction between CP and dipolar ions similar to that describedby Eq. (3.7). [Pg.22]

In addition, such an increase in enzymatic activity could result from changes in the conformation of the enzymatic molecules due to the high electrostatic activity of chitin (Dunand et al., 2002 Ozeretskovskaya et al., 2002). ft can be proposed that the PO sorption on chitin could not be considered to be a classic ion exchange process because both the anionic and cationic isoforms of the plant POs interact with chitin. Additionally, it contains 3 high anionic POs (3.5, 3.7, 4.0) but only 2 of them (3.5 and 3.7) adsorbed on chitin alongside with some cationic isoforms (Fig. 2). [Pg.207]

Several theoretical models, such as the ion-pair model [342,360,361,363,380], the dyneuaic ion-exchange model [342,362,363,375] and the electrostatic model [342,369,381-386] have been proposed to describe retention in reversed-phase IPC. The electrostatic model is the most versatile and enjoys the most support but is mathematically complex euid not very intuitive. The ion-pair model emd dynamic ion-exchange model are easier to manipulate and more instructive but are restricted to a narrow range of experimental conditions for trtilch they might reasonably be applied. The ion-pair model assumes that an ion pair is formed in the mobile phase prior to the sorption of the ion-pair complex into the stationary phase. The solute capacity factor is governed by the equilibrium constants for ion-pair formation in the mobile phase, extraction of the ion-pair complex into the stationary phase, and the dissociation of th p ion-pair complex in the... [Pg.726]

The limitations of the Kt approach stem in part from the fact that it makes no accounting of the number of sorbing sites on the sediment, treating them as if they are in excess supply. The approach allows a solute to sorb without limit, without being affected by the sorption of competing species. As well, the approach treats sorption as a simple process of attachment. It does not consider the possibility of hydrolysis at the interface between sediment and fluid, so it cannot account for the effects of pH. Nor does the approach consider electrostatic interactions between the surface and charged ions. [Pg.138]

The iteration step, however, is complicated by the need to account for the electrostatic state of the sorbing surface when setting values for mq. The surface potential T affects the sorption reactions, according to the mass action equation (Eqn. 10.13). In turn, according to Equation 10.5, the concentrations mq of the sorbed species control the surface charge and hence (by Eqn. 10.6) potential. Since the relationships are nonlinear, we must solve numerically (e.g., Westall, 1980) for a consistent set of values for the potential and species concentrations. [Pg.163]

The description of the sorption of charged molecules at a charged interface includes an electrostatic term, which is dependent upon the interfacial potential difference, Ai//(V). This term is in turn related to the surface charge density, electric double layer model. The surface charge density is calculated from the concentrations of charged molecules at the interface under the assumption that the membrane itself has a net zero charge, as is the case, for example, for membranes constructed from the zwitterionic lecithin. Moreover,... [Pg.224]

Several investigators [7,123] suggested the use of a Langmuir-type saturation model in addition to the electrostatic model to account for saturation effects. The Langmuir model implies that there are a finite number of localised sorption sites [15] ... [Pg.226]

Nevertheless, surfactant sorption isotherms on natural surfaces (sediments and biota) are generally non-linear, even at very low concentrations. Their behaviour may be explained by a Freundlich isotherm, which is adequate for anionic [3,8,14,20,30], cationic [7] and non-ionic surfactants [2,4,15,17] sorbed onto solids with heterogeneous surfaces. Recently, the virial-electrostatic isotherm has been proposed to explain anionic surfactant sorption this is of special interest since it can be interpreted on a mechanistic basis [20]. The virial equation is similar to a linear isotherm with an exponential factor, i.e. with a correction for the deviation caused by the heterogeneity of the surface or the energy of sorption. [Pg.647]

Ionic strength and pH are closely related, and their influence on the sorption process may be explained by electrostatic or chemical interactions. The ionic strength of the medium is correlated positively... [Pg.649]

Sorption. Any reduction in analyte recovery in the presence of solid media may be a reflection of losses through sorption or actual degradation, and in reality it is difficult to quantify degradation due to the unknown extent of the sorption processes. Sorption can be by intercalation (absorption), and/or electrostatic attraction and covalent... [Pg.676]

Sorption is a physical process in which a chemical binds by electrostatic, covalent or molecular forces to surfaces like biological... [Pg.898]

The surface complexation approach is distinct from the Stern model in the primacy given the specific chemical interaction at the surface over electrostatic effects, and the assignment of the surface reaction to the sorption reactions themselves (Dzombak and Morel, 1990). [Pg.49]

The preferential sorption-capillary flow mechanism of reverse osmosis does that. In the NaCl-H20-cellulose acetate membrane system, water is preferentially sorbed at the membrane-solution Interface due to electrostatic repulsion of ions in the vicinity of materials of low dielectric constant (13) and also due to the polar character of the cellulose acetate membrane material. In the p-chlorophenol-water-cellulose acetate membrane system, solute is preferentially sorbed at the interface due to higher acidity (proton donating ability) of p-chlorophenol compared to that of water and the net proton acceptor (basic) character of the polar part of cellulose acetate membrane material. In the benzene-water-cellulose acetate membrane, and cumene-water-cellulose acetate membrane systems, again solute is preferentially sorbed at the interface due to nonpolar... [Pg.22]

Del Nero, M., Ben Said, K., Made, B., Clement, A. Bontems, G. 1998. Effect of pH and carbonate concentration in solution on the sorption of neptunium(V) by hydrargilite Application of the non-electrostatic model. Radiochimica Acta, 81, 133-141. [Pg.558]


See other pages where Electrostatic sorption is mentioned: [Pg.47]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.2172]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.184]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.222 , Pg.223 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info