Sonochemical reactions ultrasonic irradiation

The choice of the solvent also has a profound influence on the observed sonochemistry. The effect of vapor pressure has already been mentioned. Other Hquid properties, such as surface tension and viscosity, wiU alter the threshold of cavitation, but this is generaUy a minor concern. The chemical reactivity of the solvent is often much more important. No solvent is inert under the high temperature conditions of cavitation (50). One may minimize this problem, however, by using robust solvents that have low vapor pressures so as to minimize their concentration in the vapor phase of the cavitation event. Alternatively, one may wish to take advantage of such secondary reactions, for example, by using halocarbons for sonochemical halogenations. With ultrasonic irradiations in water, the observed aqueous sonochemistry is dominated by secondary reactions of OH- and H- formed from the sonolysis of water vapor in the cavitation zone (51—53). 

To synthesize metal nanoparticles in an aqueous solution, the reduction reactions of the corresponding metal ions are generally performed. Gutierrez et al. [21] reported the reduction of A11CI4 and Ag+ ions in an aqueous solution by ultrasonic irradiation under H2-Ar mixed atmosphere. They found that the optimum condition of these reductions was under the 20 vol% H2 and 80 vol% Ar atmosphere. Following this study, many papers reported the sonochemical reduction of noble metal ions under pure Ar atmosphere to produce the corresponding metal nanoparticles [22-28],... 

The chemical reactions induced by ultrasonic irradiation are generally influenced by the irradiation conditions and procedures. It is suggested that ultrasound intensity , dissolved gas , distance between the reaction vessel and the oscillator and ultrasound frequency are important parameters to control the sonochemical reactions. 

Based on the above results, ultrasonic irradiation to ion-exchanged [Pd(NH3)4]2+-zeolite powders was performed in an aqueous solution containing 2-propanol. The reduction of [Pd(NH3)4]2+-zeolite to Pd°-zeolite was confirmed by XPS analyses. However, from XPS depth analyses of the prepared samples, it was suggested that the [Pd(NH3)4]2+ complexes in the zeolite pore were not sufficiently reduced even in the presence of 2-propanol. Presumably, the reductants formed from 2-propanol sonolysis could not easily diffuse into the zeolite nano-pore (size 1.2 nm) and/or reductants undergo recombination reactions and quenching reactions with the walls. In addition, the results of XPS spectral analyses of the sonochemically prepared Pd-zeolite powders indicated that the average size of the Pd clusters on the zeolite surface is roughly estimated to be less than 1 nm and composed of several dozen Pd atoms. 

Large-scale ultrasonic irradiation is extant technology. Liquid processing rates of 200 liters/minute are routinely accessible from a variety of modular, in-line designs with acoustic power of several kW per unit (83). The industrial uses of these units include (1) degassing of liquids, (2) dispersion of solids into liquids, (3) emulsification of immiscible liquids, and (4) large-scale cell disruption (74). While these units are of limited use for most laboratory research, they are of potential importance in eventual industrial application of sonochemical reactions. 

Rule 2 applies to heterogeneous systems where a more complex situation occurs and here reactions proceeding via ionic intermediates can be stimulated by the mechanical effects of cavitational agitation. This has been termed false sonochemistry although many industrialists would argue that the term false may not be correct because if the result of ultrasonic irradiation assists a reaction it should still be considered to be assisted by sonication and thus sonochemical . In fact the true test for false sonochemistry is that similar results should, in principle, be obtained using an efficient mixing system in place of sonication. Such a comparison is not always possible. 

In 1983 Suslick reported the effects of high intensity (ca. 100 W cm, 20 kHz) irradiation of alkanes at 25 °C under argon [47]. These conditions are of course, well beyond those which would be produced in a reaction vessel immersed in an ultrasonic bath and indeed those normally used for sonochemistry with a probe. Under these extreme conditions the primary products were H2, CH4, C2H2 and shorter chain alk-l-enes. These results are not dissimilar from those produced by high temperature (> 1200 °C) alkane pyrolyses. The principal degradation process under ultrasonic irradiation was considered to be C-C bond fission with the production of radicals. By monitoring the decomposition of Fe(CO)5 in different alkanes it was possible to demonstrate the inverse relationship between sonochemical effect (i. e. the energy of cavitational collapse) and solvent vapour pressure [48],... 

Another important consideration when using baths to perform sonochemical reactions is that it may be necessary to stir the mixture mechanically to achieve the maximum effect from the ultrasonic irradiation. This is particularly important when using solid-liquid mixtures where the solid is neither dispersed nor agitated throughout the reaction by sonication alone and simply sits on the base of the vessel where it is only partially available for reaction. The reason that additional stirring is so important in such cases is that it ensures the reactant powder is exposed as fully as possible to the reaction medium during sonication. 

Pettier et al. (1992) studied the sonochemical degradation of pentachlorophenol in aqueous solutions saturated with different gases at 24 °C. Ultrasonic irradiation of solutions saturated with air or oxygen resulted in the liberation of chloride ions and mineralization of the parent compound to carbon dioxide. When the solution was saturated with argon, pentachlorophenol completely degraded to carbon monoxide and chloride ions, in aqueous solution, pentachlorophenol was degraded by ozone at a reaction rate of >3.0 x 10 /M-sec at pH 2.0 (Hoigne and Bader, 1983). 

Ultrasonic irradiation of aqueous solutions of the chlorophenols was carried out with a Vibra Cell Model VC-250 direct immersion ultrasonic horn (Sonics Materials Newtown, CT) operated at a frequency of 20 kHz with a constant power output of 50 W (the actual insonation power at the solution was 49.5 W, and the power density was 52.1 W/cm2). Reactions were done in a glass sonication cell (4.4 cm i.d. by 10 cm), similar to the one described by Suslick (1988). The temporal course of the sonochemical processes was monitored by HPLC. 

Ultrasonic irradiation (-50 W/cm2) of a 100-mL air-equilibrated aqueous solution of 4-chlorophenol resulted in the first-order disappearance of the phenol, accompanied after a 1-hr delay by the first-order growth of CT. The pH of the isonated solution dropped gradually from the initial value of 5.1 to 3.5 after 11 hr. Sonolysis of the aqueous solution of 3-chlorophenol showed an induction period of -90 min following which its concentration decreased via first-order kinetics. The pH of the insonated solution of 2-chlorophenol decreased at first to 4.9 and then recovered to its near initial value until 9 hr of insonation, when it dropped abruptly to pH 4.4 and remained constant. The initial drop in pH that occurred during the induction period was also observed for the first-order disappearance of the phenol. It therefore suggests that there are various possible sites where reactions may occur in sonochem-istry. 

It is often difficult to compare the sonochemical results reported from different laboratories (the reproducibility problem in sonochemistry). The sonochemical power irradiated into the reaction system can be different for different instruments. Several methods are available to estimate the amount of ultrasonic power entered into a sonochemical reaction, the most common being calorimetry. This experiment involves measurement of the initial rate of a temperature rise produced when a system is irradiated by power ultrasound. It has been shown that calorimetric methods combined with the Weissler reaction can be used to standardize the ultrasonic power of individual ultrasonic devices. ... 

It is more difficult to prepare III-V semiconductors than the II-VI. Two sonochemical investigations reported on the preparation of these materials. The first paper details a safe method for the preparation of transition metal arsenides, FeAs, NiAs, and CoAs [142]. At room temperature, well-crystallized and monodispersed arsenide particles were successfully obtained under high-intensity ultrasonic irradiation for 4 h from the reaction of transition metal chlorides (FeCla, NiCl2, and C0CI2), arsenic (which is the least toxic arsenic feedstock) and zinc in ethanol. Different characterization techniques show that the product powders consist of nanosize particles. The ultrasonic irradiation and the solvent are both important in the formation of the product. 

The sonochemistry group in Shanghai have also reported that the fragmentation of aryl /ert-phosphines in the presence of lithium can be promoted effectively using ultrasonic irradiation [45]. Triphenylphosphines could almost quantitatively be changed into lithium diphenylphosphides and phenyl lithiums in the presence of lithium metal under ultrasonic irradiation [Eq. (5)]. Sonochemical reaction was accomplished in 25 min at ambient temperature with no induction period. The reaction rate was increased by a factor of 6, compared with silent conditions. The method has been used for the preparation of some organophosphine ligands. 

The possibility that ultrasound can be involved chemically in an intended electrochemical system is not without precedent at Wesleyan University. In earlier work involving the electroreduction of a,a -dibromo ketones at a mercury cathode, ultrasound was employed just for stirring [201,202]. It was then realized that although the dihaloketone was stable to mercury (without electrolysis) over weeks in silent conditions, the ultrasonic irradiation, which tended to produce a range of finely divided mercury droplets above the pool, induced sonochemical reduction on the metal [203]. The authors later deduced experimental conditions using either electrochemistry or chemical reaction on ultrasonically dispersed mercury that could select from the range of possible products [204]. 

---