Sonochemical effects

The sonochemical effect, the importance of solvent and the mechanism of US-assisted Diels-Alder reaction were recently critically investigated [33-35]. 

Moholkar VS, Senthilkumar P, Pandit AB (1999) Hydrodynamic cavitation for sonochemical effects. Ultrason Sonochem 6 53-65... 

Lindley J (1992) Sonochemical effects on syntheses involving solid and supported catalysts. Ultrasonics 30(3) 163-169... 

Theory Cavitational properties of ultrasound accelerate those organic reactions which involving free radical mechanism, hydrolysis, protonation, etc. However the sonochemical effects are negative for those reactions in which one of the reactants is volatile. 

Intervention of localized microscopic high temperatures is possible [8, 14, 24], as advocated in sonochemistry to justify the sonochemical effect. There is an inevitable lack of experimental evidence, because we can necessarily have access to macroscopic temperature only. It has been suggested [6, 19] that, in some examples, MW activation could originate from hot spots generated by dielectric relaxation on a molecular scale. 

Further investigations of chemical kinetics and transformation products will be carried out during the final phase of the project. In order to truly understand sonochemical effects, the behavior of the individual bubbles and the bubble clouds must be more finely resolved. Physical characterization of cavitation bubble clouds will also be performed. Thus, a more fundamental link will be established between bulk, observable parameters and sonochemistry, via the physics and hydrodynamics of the cavitating cloud. 

In general an increase in intensity (I) will provide for an increase in the sonochemical effects. Cavitation bubbles, initially difficult to create at the higher frequencies (due to the shorter time periods involved in the rarefaction cycles) will now be possible, and since both the collapse time (Eq. 2.27), the temperature (Eq. 2.35) and the pressure (Eq. 2.36) on collapse are dependent on P i(=Ph + PA)> bubble collapse will be more violent. However it must be realised that intensity cannot be increased indefinitely, since (the maximum bubble size) is also dependent upon the pressure amplitude (Eq. 2.38). With increase in the pressure amplitude (P ) the bubble may grow so large on rarefaction (R g, ) that the time available for collapse is insufficient. 

Rule 1 applies to homogeneous processes and states that those reactions which are sensitive to the sonochemical effect are those which proceed via radical or radical-ion intermediates. This statement means that sonication is able to effect reactions proceeding through radicals and that ionic reactions are not likely to be modified by such irradiation. 

Any system involving a homogeneous liquid in which bubbles are produced is not strictly homogeneous however in sonochemistry it is normal to consider the state of the system to which the ultrasound is applied. Sonochemical effects generally occur either inside the collapsing bubble where extreme conditions are produced, at the interface between the cavity and the bulk liquid where the conditions are far less extreme or in the bulk liquid immediately surrounding the bubble where the predominant effects will be mechanical (Fig. 3.2). 

In 1983 Suslick reported the effects of high intensity (ca. 100 W cm, 20 kHz) irradiation of alkanes at 25 °C under argon [47]. These conditions are of course, well beyond those which would be produced in a reaction vessel immersed in an ultrasonic bath and indeed those normally used for sonochemistry with a probe. Under these extreme conditions the primary products were H2, CH4, C2H2 and shorter chain alk-l-enes. These results are not dissimilar from those produced by high temperature (> 1200 °C) alkane pyrolyses. The principal degradation process under ultrasonic irradiation was considered to be C-C bond fission with the production of radicals. By monitoring the decomposition of Fe(CO)5 in different alkanes it was possible to demonstrate the inverse relationship between sonochemical effect (i. e. the energy of cavitational collapse) and solvent vapour pressure [48],... 

The following beneficial sonochemical effects can be expected when using sonolysis as an advanced oxidation process ... 

Solvent properties affect US-assisted digestion, as they impose a cavitation threshold above which sonochemical effects are perceived, as it were, by the medium. Therefore, any phenomenon altering the same solvent property can modify such a threshold. 

Oxidation of iodide to iodine (Eo = -0.615 V) promoted by sonication was one of the earliest tests demonstrating the sonochemical effects on solutions. The following effects were detected in water-sonicated systems with and without CCI4 and (or) iodide ... 

Application of an external pressure to a reaotion system, which increases the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid, increases the energy required to initiate cavitation. In praotioal terms, if such a threshold energy can be exceeded with the available irradiation souroe, then raising the hydrostatic pressure will increase the sonochemical effect as the maximum temperatures and pressures experienced during bubble collapse will be higher under these conditions. 

In homogeneous liquid systems, sonochemical effects generally occur either inside the collapsing bubble, — where extreme conditions are produced — at the interface between the cavity and the bulk liquid —where the conditions are far less extreme — or in the bulk liquid immediately surrounding the bubble — where mechanical effects prevail. The inverse relationship proven between ultrasonically induced acceleration rate and the temperature in hydrolysis reactions under specific conditions has been ascribed to an increase in frequency of collisions between molecules caused by the rise in cavitation pressure gradient and temperature [92-94], and to a decrease in solvent vapour pressure with a fall in temperature in the system. This relationship entails a multivariate optimization of the target system, with special emphasis on the solvent when a mixed one is used [95-97]. Such a commonplace hydrolysis reaction as that of polysaccharides for the subsequent determination of their sugar composition, whether both catalysed or uncatalysed, has never been implemented under US assistance despite its wide industrial use [98]. 

A very important point occurs in the transmission of acoustic power into a liquid which is termed the cavitation threshold. When very low power ultrasound is passed through a liquid and the power is gradually increased, a point is reached at which the intensity of sonication is sufficient to cause cavitation in the fluid. It is only at powers above the cavitation threshold that the majority of sonochemical effects occur because only then can the great energies associated with cavitational collapse be released into the fluid. In the medical profession, where the use of ultrasonic scanning techniques is widespread, keeping scanning intensities below the cavitation threshold is of vital importance. As soon as the irradiation power used in the medical scan rises above this critical value, cavitation is induced and, as a consequence, unwanted even possibly hazardous chemical reactions may occur in the body. Thus, for both chemical and medical reasons there is a considerable drive towards the determination of the exact point at which cavitation occurs in liquid media, particularly in aqueous systems. Historically, therefore, the determination of the cavitation threshold was one of the major drives in dosimetry. 

Methods based on measuring primary effects of cavitation, i.e. effects occurring in the gas phase sonoluminescence or effects occurring at the gas/liquid interface and or entirely in the liquid phase, sonochemical effects erosion, dispersion, accelerated dissolution and biochemical effects. 

---