Some fundamentals of quantum mechanics

A complete study of quantum mechanics (QM) would require a knowledge of higher mathematics and a course in theoretical physics, but the derivation of some basic equations for the calculation of molecular energies requires no more than a little algebra and calculus [1]. 

---

Now that we have reviewed some fundamentals of quantum mechanics, and laid a foundation for why bonds form, we want to turn our attention to calculating the electronic structures of atoms and molecules that are more interesting than H and H2. As always, we have to use the Schrodinger equation, but now the mathematics is much more complicated. Instead of describing all the math in detail, we touch on the fundamental math required, and we describe several of the modem techniques used in such an analysis. 

Transition metal (TM) systems present a fundamental dilemma for computational chemists. On the one hand, TM centers are often associated with relatively complicated electronic structures which appear to demand some form of quantum mechanical (QM) approach (1). On the other hand, all forms of QM are relatively compute intensive and are impractical for conformational searching, virtual high-throughput screening, or dynamics simulations... 

Atomic structure is fundamental to inorganic chemistry, perhaps more so even than organic chemistry because of the variety of elements and their electron configurations that must be dealt with. It will be assumed that readers will have brought with them from earlier courses some knowledge of quantum mechanical concepts such as the wave equation, the particle-in-a-box, and atomic spectroscopy. 

Quantum mechanics is based on several statements called postulates. These postulates are assumed, not proven. It may seem difficult to understand why an entire model of electrons, atoms, and molecules is based on assumptions, but the reason is simply because the statements based on these assumptions lead to predictions about atoms and molecules that agree with our observations. Not just a few isolated observations Over decades, millions of measurements on atoms and molecules have yielded data that agree with the conclusions based on the few postulates of quantum mechanics. With agreement between theory and experiment so abundant, the unproven postulates are accepted and no longer questioned. In the following discussion of the fundamentals of quantum mechanics, some of the statements may seem unusual or even contrary. However questionable they may seem at first, realize that statements and equations based on these postulates agree with experiment and so constitute an appropriate model for the description of subatomic matter, especially electrons. 

Some investigations have been inspired by another special circumstance concerning the structure of the fundamental heteroaromatic rings like the parent aromatic homocyclic hydrocarbons, these structures are readily amenable to theoretical treatment by the approximation methods of quantum mechanics. Quantitative studies are clearly desirable in this connection for a reliable test of the theory and, indeed, they have been utilized to this end. ... 

Quantum Cellular Automata (QCA) in order to address the possibly very fundamental role CA-like dynamics may play in the microphysical domain, some form of quantum dynamical generalization to the basic rule structure must be considered. One way to do this is to replace the usual time evolution of what may now be called classical site values ct, by unitary transitions between fe-component complex probability- amplitude states, ct > - defined in sncli a way as to permit superposition of states. As is standard in quantum mechanics, the absolute square of these amplitudes is then interpreted to give the probability of observing the corresponding classical value. Two indepcuidently defined models - both of which exhibit much of the typically quantum behavior observed in real systems are discussed in chapter 8.2,... 

The existence of superatoms was first predicted in 1924 by an Indian physicist, S. N. Bose, and elaborated further by Albert Einstein. Over 70 years later, studies at ultralow temperature confirmed the predictions. Physicists and chemists continue to work at the limits of low temperature to test some of the most fundamental predictions of quantum mechanics. Undoubtedly, additional Nobel Prizes will reward such research. 

Chaos provides an excellent illustration of this dichotomy of worldviews (A. Peres, 1993). Without question, chaos exists, can be experimentally probed, and is well-described by classical mechanics. But the classical picture does not simply translate to the quantum view attempts to find chaos in the Schrodinger equation for the wave function, or, more generally, the quantum Liouville equation for the density matrix, have all failed. This failure is due not only to the linearity of the equations, but also the Hilbert space structure of quantum mechanics which, via the uncertainty principle, forbids the formation of fine-scale structure in phase space, and thus precludes chaos in the sense of classical trajectories. Consequently, some people have even wondered if quantum mechanics fundamentally cannot describe the (macroscopic) real world. 

The structure of quantum mechanics (QM) relates the wavefunction and operators F to the real world in which experimental measurements are performed through a set of rules (Dirac s text is an excellent source of reading concerning the historical development of these fundamentals). Some of these rules have already been introduced above. Here, they are presented in total as follows ... 

Equation (1.3) represents a very simple model, and that simplicity derives, presumably, from the small volume of chemical space over which it appears to hold. As it is hard to imagine deriving Eq. (1.3) from the fundamental equations of quantum mechanics, it might be more descriptive to refer to it as a relationship rather than a model . That is, we make some attempt to distinguish between correlation and causality. For the moment, we will not parse the terms too closely. 

In order to describe microscopic systems, then, a different mechanics was required. One promising candidate was wave mechanics, since standing waves are also a quantized phenomenon. Interestingly, as first proposed by de Broglie, matter can indeed be shown to have wavelike properties. However, it also has particle-Uke properties, and to properly account for this dichotomy a new mechanics, quanmm mechanics, was developed. This chapter provides an overview of the fundamental features of quantum mechanics, and describes in a formal way the fundamental equations that are used in the construction of computational models. In some sense, this chapter is historical. However, in order to appreciate the differences between modem computational models, and the range over which they may be expected to be applicable, it is important to understand the foundation on which all of them are built. Following this exposition. Chapter 5 overviews the approximations inherent... 

We begin with a brief recapitulation of some of the key features of quantum mechanics. The fundamental postulate of quantum mechanics is that a so-called wave function, P, exists for any (chemical) system, and that appropriate operators (functions) which act upon h return the observable properties of the system. In mathematical notation. 

In this chapter we introduce the SchrSdinger equation this equation is fundamental to all applications of quantum mechanics to chemical problems. For molecules of chemical interest it is an equation which is exceedingly difficult to solve and any possible simplifications due to the symmetry of the system concerned are very welcome. We are able to introduce symmetry, and thereby the results of the previous chapters, by proving one single but immensely valuable fact the transformation operators Om commute with the Hamiltonian operator, Jf. It is by this subtle thread that we can then deduce some of the properties of the solutions of the Schrodinger equation without even solving it. 

II, plus some additional terms hence, according to the fundamental ideas of quantum mechanics, if it were possible to carry out an experimental test of the electronic structure Oust would identify structure I or structure II, each structure would be found for the molecule to the extent determined by the waee function. The difficulty for benzene and for other molecules showing electronic resonance is to devise an experimental test that could be carried out quickly enough and that would distinguish among the structures under discussion. In benzene the frequency of Kekuld resonance is only a little less than the frequency of the bonding resonance of electron pairs, so that the time required for the experiment is closely limited. 

S. A. Rice My answer to Prof. Manz is that, as I indicated in my presentation, both the Brumer-Shapiro and the Tannor-Rice control schemes have been verified experimentally. To date, control of the branching ratio in a chemical reaction, or of any other process, by use of temporally and spectrally shaped laser fields has not been experimentally demonstrated. However, since all of the control schemes are based on the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, it would be very strange (and disturbing) if they were not to be verified. This statement is not intended either to demean the experimental difficulties that must be overcome before any verification can be achieved or to imply that verification is unnecessary. Even though the principles of the several proposed control schemes are not in question, the implementation of the analysis of any particular case involves approximations, for example, the neglect of the influence of some states of the molecule on the reaction. Moreover, for lack of sufficient information, our understanding of the robustness of the proposed control schemes to the inevitable uncertainties introduced by, for example, fluctuations in the laser field, is very limited. Certainly, experimental verification of the various control schemes in a variety of cases will be very valuable. 

We will discuss quantum mechanics extensively in Chapters 5 and 6. It provides the best description we have to date of the behavior of atoms and molecules. The Schrodinger equation, which is the fundamental defining equation of quantum mechanics (it is as central to quantum mechanics as Newton s laws are to the motions of particles), is a differential equation that involves a second derivative. In fact, while Newton s laws can be understood in some simple limits without calculus (for example, if a particle starts atx = 0 and moves with constant velocity vx,x = vxt at later times), it is very difficult to use quantum mechanics in any quantitative way without using derivatives. 

Some notions of the mechanism of electron transfer were given in Section 4.2. Any theory must be realistic and take into account the reorientation of the ionic atmosphere in mathematical terms. There have been many contributions in this area, especially by Marcus, Hush, Levich, Dog-nadze, and others5-9. The theories have been of a classical or quantum-mechanical nature, the latter being more difficult to develop but more correct. It is fundamental that the theories permit quantitative comparison between rates of electron transfer in electrodes and in homogeneous solution. 

---