Solvents unfriendly

Ethyl acetate is an oxygenated solvent widely used in the inks, pharmaceuticals and fragrance sectors. The current global capacity for ethyl acetate is 1.2 million tonnes per annum. BP Chemicals is the world s largest producer of ethyl acetate. Conventional methods for the production of ethyl acetate are either via the liquid phase esterification of acetic acid and ethanol or by the coupling of acetaldehyde also known as the Tischenko reaction. Both of these processes require environmentally unfriendly catalysts (e.g. p-toluenesulphonic acid for the esterification and metal chlorides and strong bases for the Tischenko route). In 1997 BP Chemicals disclosed a new route to produce ethyl acetate directly from the reaction of ethylene with acetic acid using supported heteropoly acids... 

I2 vapor is extremely corrosive while scandium compounds are moisture-sensitive and very expensive. In addition, these reactions are carried out in an environmentally unfriendly solvent, CH2CI2. We have reported the bismuth triflate-catalyzed synthesis of substituted dihydro-2//-1-benzopyrans by the condensation of substituted salicylaldehydes with 2,2-dimethoxypropane (Scheme 3) [22]. 

The use of solvents that may have themselves unfriendly characteristics. Therefore, the development of new processes having lower environmental impact represents one important target (1,2). in the present work we report about... 

Salts are purified by recrystallization and this procedure can be applied for ILs also. The recrystallization is performed by solving the compound in a small amount of acetonitrile and by adding a small amount of toluene to the solution. The solution was cooled in a freezer (-18°C). White crystals of the IL were formed. After filtration, the crystals were washed with an ice-cold toluene and the remaining solvent was removed by evaporation on a rotavap under reduced pressure [39]. This method is not universal as many ILs are oily liquids at room temperature or even at temperatures well below room temperature and are quite difficult to crystallize. There is of course always a loss of IL due fo the washing of the samples. It is always necessary to avoid using environmentally unfriendly solvents, especially halogen-containing ones that are not suitable for industrial applications. 

As shown in Figure 14.3, this process involved thirteen unit operations. Apart from colloidal iodate/manganate waste, significant aqueous waste was also generated. Additionally, the usage of multiple solvents (t-butanol, dichloromethane, water, and petroleum ether) in the reaction and isolation makes the synthesis, presented in Scheme 14.11, less attractive and more eco-unfriendly. 

Urine analysis for illegal drugs is increasingly performed in forensic laboratories (especially in Japan). Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is extensively used because of its versatility and reliability. By way of sample preparation for GC analysis, conventional liquid-liquid extraction has a widespread use, but it is not only laborious but also environmentally unfriendly due to the consumption of considerable amounts of organic solvents. Therefore, microintegration of the sample preparation procedure is required. 

Moreover, Boerhaave introduced a mystical cause in order to explain why the particles of the solvent dissociate themselves from one another and unite with the particles of the solvend, rather than remaining in their former situation. The same cause also explains why the particles of the solvend, separated by the action of the solvent, remain united with the parts of the menstruum rather than that the dissolving and dissolved particles unite by the affinity of their own nature into homogeneous bodies. Boerhaave ascribed the cause of dissolution to a certain power with which the parts of a menstruum endeavour to attract the dissolved parts, rather than to repel them. Therefore, Boerhaave states, we are not to imagine this is a mechanical action, or an unfriendly commotion but rather an appetite of union. The Latin original expresses this union even stronger as a union of love or friendship. 

A considerably increased choice of suitable solvents (toluene, EtOAc, various ketones), not limited to environmentally unfriendly chlorinated ones (e.g., CH2C12). 

In this introduction, we have presented an overview of the benefits of applying the technique of SFE to the area of food analysis. There are substantially reduced costs derived from use of SFE versus traditional extraction in the areas of solvent purchase costs, solvent disposal costs, reduced labour charges, and even less need to repeat experiments due to reduced human errors in the overall analytical scheme. Moreover, productivity can be improved and the use of environmentally-unfriendly solvents is greatly reduced. In the rest of this chapter we will explore the fundamental principles of SFE in more detail, discuss some of the aspects of current SFE instrumentation, present a number of examples of applying SFE to food samples, and briefly summarise some hints for methods development. 

The initial research efforts focused on the preparation of the precursor, the omegar-r-butyldimethylsilyloxyalkyl halide, from the corresponding haloalcohol and /-butyldimethylsilyl chloride. The t-butyldimethylsilyl moiety was originally introduced as an alcohol protecting group by Corey. In this procedure, 1.2 equivalents of t-butyldimethylsilyl chloride and 2.5 equivalents of imidazole, as the acid acceptor, were utilized. The solvent employed was N,N-dimethylformamide. These reaction conditions afforded the desired product in excellent yield. However, the cost of the excess reagents, their subsequent removal, the utilization of an expensive, hydroscopic solvent, and an aqueous workup were not very practical from a commercial perspective. Since its inception in 1972, a variety of other procedures have been described for the preparation of t-butyldimethylsilyl ethers. These procedures typically require solvents that are expensive, difficult to recycle, or environmentally unfriendly. Furthermore, traces of some of these solvents, such as methylene chloride, in the precursor would be incompatible with lithium metal in the subsequent lithiation step. 

In addition to the solvents used in adhesives, solvents are needed for surface prepara-tion and primers. Their composition may vary and is usually designed for a particular substrate, often using fast evaporating solvents and environmentally unfriendly materials with significant adverse health effects. 

The binder extraction method is the most common and widely used method for determining the binder content in the mixture. It uses hydrocarbon solvents capable of dissolving bitumen and a binder extraction apparatus. Because of the high purchase and disposal costs of solvents, the risk to the operator s personal health and safety and the environmentally unfriendly nature of the hydrocarbon solvents, this test method was started to be replaced with the ignition method. The binder extraction method by European standards is conducted in accordance with CEN EN 12697-1 (2012), whereas that by American standards is in accordance with ASTM D 2172 (2011) or AASHTO T 164 (2013) and AASHTO T 319 (2008). A detailed description of the binder extraction test method is given in Section 9.6.1. 

The thermal control of the reactor is much easier if the monomer is polymerized in solution. The solvent lowers the monomer concentration, and consequently the heat generation rate per unit volume of the reactor. In addition, the lower viscosity allows a higher heat removal rate and the solvent allows for the use of reflux condensers. Reflux cooling removes the heat of polymerization by evaporation of solvent the condensed vapor is recycled to the reacting mass. Remixing of the condensed solvent with the viscous reacting mass may be difficult. Solution processes are used for the manufacture of LLDPE [19]. The main drawback is dealing with an environmentally unfriendly solvent, which makes solvent recovery a critical issue. 

---