Solvation continued

Aqueous solutions of ionic compounds Recall that water molecules are polar molecules and are in constant motion, as described by the kinetic-molecular theory. When a crystal of an ionic compound, such as sodium chloride (NaCl), is placed in water, the water molecules collide with the surface of the crystal. The charged ends of the water molecules attract the positive sodium ions and negative chloride ions. This attraction between the dipoles and the ions is greater than the attraction among the ions in the crystal, so the ions break away from the surface. The water molecules surround the ions, and the solvated ions move into the solution, shown in Figure 14.10, exposing more ions on the surface of the crystal. Solvation continues until the entire crystal has dissolved. 

The types of solvates present and their distribution are key determinants in the resulting electrolyte properties. It is noteworthy that the solvates continuously transform from one type of coordination to another with continuous exchanges of solvent molecules and anions in the cation s coordination shell [6]. The structure of the solvent is one important factor in the solvate formation, in terms of both its ability to donate electron density through donor atoms and steric effects which impact the packing of the solvent molecules and anions around the cations. The structure of the anions is another critical factor. For lithium salts in aprotic... 

Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy (Continued) B. Ionic interactions and ionic solvation (Continued) (b) Nonagueous Electrolytes... 

The constants K depend upon the volume of the solvent molecule (assumed to be spherica in slrape) and the number density of the solvent. ai2 is the average of the diameters of solvent molecule and a spherical solute molecule. This equation may be applied to solute of a more general shape by calculating the contribution of each atom and then scaling thi by the fraction of fhat atom s surface that is actually exposed to the solvent. The dispersioi contribution to the solvation free energy can be modelled as a continuous distributioi function that is integrated over the cavity surface [Floris and Tomasi 1989]. 

The mode of action of plasticizers can be explained using the Gel theory [35 ]. According to this theory, the deformation resistance of amorphous polymers can be ascribed to the cross-links between active centres which are continuously formed and destroyed. The cross-links are constituted by micro-aggregates or crystallites of small size. When a plasticizer is added, its molecules also participate in the breaking down and re-forming of these cross-links. As a consequence, a proportion of the active centres of the polymer are solvated and do not become available for polymer-to-polymer links, the polymer structure being correspondingly loosened. 

Methods for evaluating the effect of a solvent may broadly be divided into two types those describing the individual solvent molecules, as discussed in Section 16.1, and those which treat the solvent as a continuous medium. Combinations are also possible, for example by explicitly considering the first solvation sphere and treating the rest by a continuum model. Each of these may be subdivided according to whether they use a classical or quantum mechanical description. 

It certainly does not seem that these interactions continue in solution, so that their magnitude is weaker than solvation forces. Theoretical explanation has suggested that the unused, filled, 6s-5dz2 hybrid (section 4.1) interacts with vacant 6px,py orbitals at right angles to the digonal bonds (Figure 4.49). 

Transition states (Continued) in hydrogen abstraction, 25 in phosphodiester hydrolysis, 190 reactant-like vs product-like, 96 solvation energy of, 211, 213,214 solvent effects on, 46 stabilization of charge distribution, 91, 225-227... 

Surface force apparatus has been applied successfully over the past years for measuring normal surface forces as a function of surface gap or film thickness. The results reveal, for example, that the normal forces acting on confined liquid composed of linear-chain molecules exhibit a periodic oscillation between the attractive and repulsive interactions as one surface continuously approaches to another, which is schematically shown in Fig. 19. The period of the oscillation corresponds precisely to the thickness of a molecular chain, and the oscillation amplitude increases exponentially as the film thickness decreases. This oscillatory solvation force originates from the formation of the layering structure in thin liquid films and the change of the ordered structure with the film thickness. The result provides a convincing example that the SFA can be an effective experimental tool to detect fundamental interactions between the surfaces when the gap decreases to nanometre scale. 

Below some critical surfactant concentration, the system is two-phase with excess oil or water depending on the oil/water concentration. On adding more surfactant, the system moves into a one-phase region with normal micelles forming in water-rich systems. The water constitutes the continuous phase, solvating the headgroups of the surfactant whose hydro-phobic tails solubilise oil in the core of the micelle. In oil rich systems, reverse-micelles form. With further increases in surfactant composition. 

Much attention has been directed since olden times towards ion solvation, which is a key concept for understanding various chemical processes with electrolyte solutions. In 1920, a theoretical equation of ion solvation energy (AG ) was first proposed by Born [1], who considered the ion as a hard sphere of a given radius (r) immersed in a continuous medium of constant permittivity (e), and then defined AG as the electrostatic energy for charging the ion up to ze (z, the charge number of the ion e, the elementary charge) ... 

On the assumption that = 2, the theoretical values of the ion solvation energy were shown to agree well with the experimental values for univalent cations and anions in various solvents (e.g., 1,1- and 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrahydrofuran, 1,2-dimethoxyethane, ammonia, acetone, acetonitrile, nitromethane, 1-propanol, ethanol, methanol, and water). Abraham et al. [16,17] proposed an extended model in which the local solvent layer was further divided into two layers of different dielectric constants. The nonlocal electrostatic theory [9,11,12] was also presented, in which the permittivity of a medium was assumed to change continuously with the electric field around an ion. Combined with the above-mentioned Uhlig formula, it was successfully employed to elucidate the ion transfer energy at the nitrobenzene-water and 1,2-dichloroethane-water interfaces. 

In the past few years, a range of solvation dynamics experiments have been demonstrated for reverse micellar systems. Reverse micelles form when a polar solvent is sequestered by surfactant molecules in a continuous nonpolar solvent. The interaction of the surfactant polar headgroups with the polar solvent can result in the formation of a well-defined solvent pool. Many different kinds of surfactants have been used to form reverse micelles. However, the structure and dynamics of reverse micelles created with Aerosol-OT (AOT) have been most frequently studied. AOT reverse micelles are monodisperse, spherical water droplets [32]. The micellar size is directly related to the water volume-to-surfactant surface area ratio defined as the molar ratio of water to AOT,... 

Girault and Schiffrin [4] proposed an alternative model, which questioned the concept of the ion-free inner layer at the ITIES. They suggested that the interfacial region is not molecularly sharp, but consist of a mixed solvent region with a continuous change in the solvent properties [Fig. 1(b)]. Interfacial solvent mixing should lead to the mixed solvation of ions at the ITIES, which influences the surface excess of water [4]. Existence of the mixed solvent layer has been supported by theoretical calculations for the lattice-gas model of the liquid-liquid interface [23], which suggest that the thickness of this layer depends on the miscibility of the two solvents [23]. However, for solvents of experimental interest, the interfacial thickness approaches the sum of solvent radii, which is comparable with the inner-layer thickness in the MVN model. 

---