Solid phase electrical potential

Figure 2.4 Sketch of an electric double layer next to a negatively charged solid surface. Through balance of thermal motion and electrostatic forces a rapidly decaying electric potential IFdevelops inside the liquid phase.

The liquid-liquid interface is not only a boundary plane dividing two immiscible liquid phases, but also a nanoscaled, very thin liquid layer where properties such as cohesive energy, density, electrical potential, dielectric constant, and viscosity are drastically changed along with the axis from one phase to another. The interfacial region was anticipated to cause various specific chemical phenomena not found in bulk liquid phases. The chemical reactions at liquid-liquid interfaces have traditionally been less understood than those at liquid-solid or gas-liquid interfaces, much less than the bulk phases. These circumstances were mainly due to the lack of experimental methods which could measure the amount of adsorbed chemical species and the rate of chemical reaction at the interface [1,2]. Several experimental methods have recently been invented in the field of solvent extraction [3], which have made a significant breakthrough in the study of interfacial reactions. 

Ion-selective electrodes are systems containing a membrane consisting basically either of a layer of solid electrolyte or of an electrolyte solution whose solvent is immiscible with water. The membrane is in contact with an aqueous electrolyte solution on both sides (or sometimes only on one). The ion-selective electrode frequently contains an internal reference electrode, sometimes only a metallic contact, or, for an ion-selective field-effect transistor (ISFET), an insulating and a semiconducting layer. In order to understand what takes place at the boundary between the membrane and the other phases with which it is in contact, various types of electric potential or of potential difference formed in these membrane systems must first be defined. 

Similar types of electric double layer may also be formed at the phase boundary between a solid electrolyte and an aqueous electrolyte solution [7]. They are formed because one electrically-charged component of the solid electrolyte is more readily dissolved, for example the fluoride ion in solid LaFs, leading to excess charge in the solid phase, which, as a result of movement of the holes formed, diffuses into the soUd electrolyte. Another possible way a double layer may be formed is by adsorption of electrically-charged components from solution on the phase boundary, or by reactions of such components with some component of the solid electrolyte. For LaFa this could be the reaction of hydroxyl ions with the trivalent lanthanum ion. Characteristically, for the phase boundary between two immiscible electrolyte solutions, where neither solution contains an amphiphilic ion, the electric double layer consists of two diffuse electric double layers, with no compact double layer at the actual phase boundary, in contrast to the metal electrode/ electrolyte solution boundary [4,8, 35] (see fig. 2.1). Then, for the potential... 

Fig. 1. Variation of the eiectric potential near a surface in the presence of an electrolyte solution, (a) Electrical double layer at the surface of a solid positively charged, in contact with an electrolyte solution, (b) The variation of the electrical potential when the measurement is made at an increasing distance from the surface, and when the liquid phase is mobile at a given flow rate. The zeta potential [) can be calculated from the streaming potential, which can be measured according to the method described by Thubikar et al. [4].

The previous section discussed the structure at the junction of two phases, the one a solid electron conductor, the other an ionic solution. Why is this important Knowledge of the structure of the interface, the distribution of particles in this region, and the variation of the electric potential in the double layer, permits one to control reactions occurring in this region. Control of these reactions is important because they are the foundation stones of important mechanisms linked to the understanding of industrial processes and problems, such as deposition and dissolution of metals, corrosion, electrocatalysis, film formation, and electro-organic synthesis. 

In this paper the problem of stationary flow of two-ionic species electrolyte through random piezoelectric porous media is studied, thus extending our earlier paper [14], where periodicity was assumed. To derive the macroscopic equations we use the method od stochastic two-scale convergence in the mean developed by [4], Solid phase was assumed to be piezoelectric since according to [9] wet bone reveals piezoelectric properties, cf. also [15], We recall that a strong conviction prevails that for electric effects in bone only streaming potentials are responsible. 

Because the flow of electric current always involves the transport of matter in solution and chemical transformations at the solution-electrode interface, local behavior can only be approached. It can be approximated, however, by a reference electrode whose potential is controlled by a well-defined electron-transfer process in which the essential solid phases are present in an adequate amount and the solution constituents are present at sufficiently high concentrations. The electron transfer is a dynamic process, occurring even when no net current flows and the larger the anodic and cathodic components of this exchange current, the more nearly reversible and nonpolarizable the reference electrode will be. A large exchange current increases the slope of the current-potential curve so that the potential of the electrode is more nearly independent of the current. The current-potential curves (polarization curves) are frequently used to characterize the reversibility of reference electrodes. 

The liquid-liquid interface formed between two immissible liquids is an extremely thin mixed-liquid state with about one nanometer thickness, in which the properties such as cohesive energy density, electrical potential, dielectric constant, and viscosity are drastically changing from those of bulk phases. Solute molecules adsorbed at the interface can behave like a 2D gas, liquid, or solid depending on the interfacial pressure, or interfacial concentration. But microscopically, the interfacial molecules exhibit local inhomogeneity. Therefore, various specific chemical phenomena, which are rarely observed in bulk liquid phases, can be observed at liquid-liquid interfaces [1-3]. However, the nature of the liquid-liquid interface and its chemical function are still less understood. These situations are mainly due to the lack of experimental methods required for the determination of the chemical species adsorbed at the interface and for the measurement of chemical reaction rates at the interface [4,5]. Recently, some new methods were invented in our laboratory [6], which brought a breakthrough in the study of interfacial reactions. 

Diffusion time (diffusion time constant) — This parameter appears in numerous problems of - diffusion, diffusion-migration, or convective diffusion (- diffusion, subentry -> convective diffusion) of an electroactive species inside solution or a solid phase and means a characteristic time interval for the process to approach an equilibrium or a steady state after a perturbation, e.g., a stepwise change of the electrode potential. For onedimensional transport across a uniform layer of thickness L the diffusion time constant, iq, is of the order of L2/D (D, -> diffusion coefficient of the rate-determining species). For spherical diffusion (inside a spherical volume or in the solution to the surface of a spherical electrode) r spherical diffusion). The same expression is valid for hemispherical diffusion in a half-space (occupied by a solution or another conducting medium) to the surface of a disk electrode, R being the disk radius (-> diffusion, subentry -> hemispherical diffusion). For the relaxation of the concentration profile after an electrical perturbation (e.g., a potential step) Tj = L /D LD being - diffusion layer thickness in steady-state conditions. All these expressions can be derived from the qualitative estimate of the thickness of the nonstationary layer... 

There is a range of equations used describing the experimental data for the interactions of a substance as liquid and solid phases. They extend from simple empirical equations (sorption isotherms) to complicated mechanistic models based on surface complexation for the determination of electric potentials, e.g. constant-capacitance, diffuse-double layer and triple-layer model. 

This model is based on the Gouy-Chapman theory (diffuse double-layer theory). The theory states that in the area of the boundary layer between solid and aqueous phase, independently of the surface charge, increased concentrations of cations and anions within a diffuse layer exists because of electrostatic forces. In contrast to the constant-capacitance model, the electrical potential does not change up to a certain distance from the phase boundaries and is not immediately declining in a linear manner (Fig. 14 a). Diffusion counteracts these forces, leading to dilution with increasing distance from the boundary. This relation can be described physically by the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. 

During the PEVD process, a chemical redox reaction takes place and the whole PEVD system can he viewed as a chemical reactor where the reactants are distributed over both the source and sink sides. According to the previous discussion, the driving force for this PEVD process can be solely provided by a dc electric potential, so that isolation of the source and sink vapor phases is not necessary. Consequently, the PEVD process is equivalent to physically moving a solid phase Na COj through another solid phase (Na+-[3"-alumina) by electric energy. Furthermore, it should be pointed out that the overall cell reaction in this PEVD system is reversible. 

---