Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solid Density Prediction

Solid Density Prediction The prediction of solid density is an inexact science and sometimes is taken as the liquid density at the triple point, although the solid density normally is higher than this value with a discontinuity at the triple point. Based on sohd density data reviewed for the DIPPR compilation, the solid density at the triple point can be estimated for organic compounds as 1.17 times the liquid density at the triple point. As liquid density at low temperatures varies little with temperature, the density of the liquid at the lowest estimable point above the triple point can be used with little degradation of the result. As solid density only decreases very slightly with increasing temperature and very little data on solid density as a function of temperature exist, no methods have been developed for predicting the solid density vs. temperature. [Pg.409]

If the region FGH of the isotherm represents the filling of all the pores with liquid adsorbate, then the amount adsorbed along to plateau FGH, when expressed as a volume of liquid (by use of the normal liquid density) should be the same for all adsorptives on a given porous solid. This prediction is embodied in a generalization put forward many years ago by Gurvitsch and usually known as the Gurvitsch rule. [Pg.113]

Density is defined as the mass of a substance contained in a unit volume. In the SI system of units, the ratio of the density of a substance to the density of water at I5°C is known as its relative density, while the older term specific gravity is the ratio relative to water at 60°F. Various units of density, such as kg/m, Ib-mass/fF, and g/cm, are commonly used. In addition, molar densities, or the density divided by the molecular weight, is often specified. This section briefly discusses methods of correlation of density as a function of temperature and presents the most common accurate methods for prediction of vapor, liquid, and solid density. [Pg.399]

Fig. 6.7. The predicted, one-dimensional, mean-bulk temperatures versus location at various times are shown for a typical powder compact subjected to the same loading as in Fig. 6.5. It should be observed that the early, low pressure causes the largest increase in temperature due to the crush-up of the powder to densities approaching solid density. The "spike in the temperature shown on the profiles at the interfaces of the powder and copper is an artifact due to numerical instabilities (after Graham [87G03]). Fig. 6.7. The predicted, one-dimensional, mean-bulk temperatures versus location at various times are shown for a typical powder compact subjected to the same loading as in Fig. 6.5. It should be observed that the early, low pressure causes the largest increase in temperature due to the crush-up of the powder to densities approaching solid density. The "spike in the temperature shown on the profiles at the interfaces of the powder and copper is an artifact due to numerical instabilities (after Graham [87G03]).
Recently, on-line FBRM, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and PLS were used to moifitor a complex crystallization system a racemic free base of a given componnd and a chiral acid. The anthors first demonstrate that the diastereomeric composition can be estimated nsing Raman spectral data, slnrry density and temperature using a PLS model. Consequently the issne of on-line slurry density prediction, which is not readily available, arises. An additional PLS model was constructed that used the ATR-FTIR spectral data to infer slurry density. Slurry density as predicted in real-time via ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was fed into the aforementioned Raman, slurry density and temperatnre PLS model to yield a more accnrate estimate of the fractional solid composition of the two diastereomers. ... [Pg.443]

How well do the sedimentation coefficients and densities predicted by the model match the values actually observed for LDL Excellent agreement with the experimental points is shown by the solid curve of Fig. 2, which is a plot of the values for 525,1.20 given in Table II. However, this agreement was achieved by selecting a value for the partial specific volume of the cholesteryl esters to make the best fit, yielding the value of 1.058 ml/g for this this quantity. [If a value of 1.044 ml/g were employed for the partial specific volume of the cholesteryl esters, as was used by Sata et al. (1972), the values of 525,1.20 listed in Table II would have decreased by about 3,5%. The values of S[ in Table II would have dropped by 1 to 2 Svedbergs.]... [Pg.225]

Solids Solid density data are sparse and usually available only within a narrow temperature range. For most solids, density decreases approximately linearly with increasing temperature. Prediction of solid densities is an inexact science, but reasonable correlation has been found between the density of the hquid phase at the triple point and the solid that is stable at the triple point conditions. [Pg.532]

Recently, the approximations underlying the perturbative DFTs have been called into question [130-132]. The solid density p (r) predicted by this theory and measured in computer simulations is very sharply peaked about lattice sites, as can be inferred from the relative smallness of the Lindemann parameter near melting. Thus, the expansion parameter Pj(r) - Pi is by no means small, so that the truncation of the functional... [Pg.584]

Figure 3. Narrow gate experiment measuring the density of OH as a function of time after the CO2 heating pulse, at the center of the pyrolysis cell. Points, experimental results solid line, predictions from computer calculation and dashed line, pyrolysis rate of at the initial temperature. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. k. Copyright 1983, Journal of Chemical Physics.)... Figure 3. Narrow gate experiment measuring the density of OH as a function of time after the CO2 heating pulse, at the center of the pyrolysis cell. Points, experimental results solid line, predictions from computer calculation and dashed line, pyrolysis rate of at the initial temperature. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. k. Copyright 1983, Journal of Chemical Physics.)...
At this point we can compare predictions from the CSM model to the DSM model. First, the effect of power law index on melting time is shown in Fig. 7.51. The data are for a 50 mm extruder running at 60 rpm with an output of l.OE-5 mys. The material data is typical for LDPE, melt density 780 kg/m solid density 920 kg/m, AEp is 3.0E5 N-m/kg, and the consistency index is m = 20,000 Pa-s". The melting times are compared based on an initial solids fraction of 0.5. For all the values of the power law index the DSM time is significantly shorter than the CSM time the difference becomes larger with smaller values of the power law index. [Pg.338]

Nuckols, Wood, Theisen and Zinunerman in Nature 1972 clarified in which way several groups in the USA intended to push inertial confinement /15/. In many ways the ideas mentioned in this paper were familiar to us in Frascati what came as a surprise was the aim to supercompress a Z), T plasma to densities 1000 or even 10000 times the density of D-T ice. Somehow, and for no apparent reason, the solid density ns — 5.10 ions/cm remained for a time a sort of mental barrier and although the trigger-criterion (known in its various forms since at least 1960) predicted that trigger-energy... [Pg.244]

We presented a novel quenched solid non-local density functional (QSNLDFT) model, which provides a r istic description of adsorption on amorphous surfaces without resorting to computationally expensive two- or three-dimensional DFT formulations. The main idea is to consider solid as a quenched component of the solid-fluid mixture rather than a source of the external potential. The QSNLDFT extends the quenched-annealed DFT proposed recently by M. Schmidt and cowoikers [23,24] for systems with hard core interactions to porous solids with attractive interactions. We presented several examples of calculated adsorption isotherms on amorphous and microporous solids, which are in qualitative agreement with experimental measurements on typical polymer-templated silica materials like SBA-15, FDU-1 and oftiers. Introduction of the solid density distribution in QSNLDFT eliminates strong layering of the fluid near the walls that was a characteristic feature of NLDFT models with smoodi pore walls. As the result, QSNLDFT predicts smooth isotherms in the region of polymolecular adsorption. The main advantage of the proposed approach is that QSNLDFT retains one-dimensional solid and fluid density distributions, and thus, provides computational efficiency and accuracy similar to conventional NLDFT models. [Pg.15]

Figure 21 illustrates the ability of the mechanistic model to match complicated suspended solids density profiles from the 152 mm x 152 mm higher temperature pilot plant. Increas suspension densities at the top of the unit are due to considerable internal inertial separation at the exit. The profiles are used to find best fit values of the scale independent "wall-to-core flux coefficient" and "wall-layer disturbance factor". The model effectively predicts the variation of suspension density with height, solids circulation rate and gas velocity using these best fit values. [Pg.530]

Figure la shows that for the n=l and n =l intermediate excitons too, extrapolation to liquid densities predicts correctly the position of an electronic excitation of the liquid. However, since even the transitions in the solid seem to be related to atomic transitions, the question arises whether their counterpart in the liquids can be distinguished at... [Pg.245]

Generalizing to any two locations, 1 and 2, in the extruder and substituting in the definition of G the mass flow rate of solid followed by rearranging terms gives an extrusion model, which can predict the width of the solid bed at any location along the screw from knowledge of the melting rate, the solid bed barrel contact area, the solid density (function of solid temperature and internal pressure), the down chaimel solid velocity and the physical dimensions of the screw chaimel (Eq. 12.16). [Pg.233]

FIGURE 3.2 Diffuse potential as a function of the surface charge density predicted by the HNC/MSA (solid lines) and PB (dashed lines) approaches for several salt concentrations of a 2 2 electrolyte (indicated in the graph) and an ionic radius of 0.4 nm. [Pg.68]

Valence electron density for the diamond structures of carbon and silicon. (Figure redrawn from Cohen M L i. Predicting New Solids and Superconductors. Science 234 549-553.)... [Pg.178]


See other pages where Solid Density Prediction is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.1621]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.1426]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.664]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.259]   


SEARCH



Density prediction

Density solid densities

© 2024 chempedia.info