Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Similarity coefficients

The coefficient Bij characterizes a bimolecular interaction between molecules i and J, and therefore Bij = Bji. Two lands of second virial coefficient arise Bn and By, wherein the subscripts are the same (i =j) and Bij, wherein they are different (i j). The first is a virial coefficient for a pure species the second is a mixture property, called a cross coefficient. Similarly for the third virial coefficients Cm, Cjjj, and are for the pure species and Qy = Cyi = Cjn, and so on, are cross coefficients. [Pg.529]

A comparison of the axial-dispersion coefficients obtained in oscil-lating-spiral and dense-bed crystalhzers is given in Table 22-5. The dense-bed column approaches axial-dispersion coefficients similar to those of densely packed ice-washing cohimns. [Pg.1994]

Figures 3 and 4 show the variation of the average attachment coefficient with CMD. It can be seen that for particles of CMD less than 0.06 ym and Og = 2 the kinetic theory predicts an attachment coefficient similar to the hybrid theory, whereas for CMD greater than about 1 ym the diffusion theory and the hybrid theory give approximately the same results. For a more polydisperse aerosol (Og = 3) the kinetic theory deviates from the hybrid theory even at a CMD = 0.01 ym. The diffusion theory is accurate for a CMD greater than about 0.6 ym. These results are easily explained since as the aerosol becomes more polydisperse, there are more large diameter particles (CMD >0.3 ym) which attach according to the diffusion theory. In contrast, the kinetic theory becomes more inaccurate as the aerosol becomes more polydisperse. Figures 3 and 4 show the variation of the average attachment coefficient with CMD. It can be seen that for particles of CMD less than 0.06 ym and Og = 2 the kinetic theory predicts an attachment coefficient similar to the hybrid theory, whereas for CMD greater than about 1 ym the diffusion theory and the hybrid theory give approximately the same results. For a more polydisperse aerosol (Og = 3) the kinetic theory deviates from the hybrid theory even at a CMD = 0.01 ym. The diffusion theory is accurate for a CMD greater than about 0.6 ym. These results are easily explained since as the aerosol becomes more polydisperse, there are more large diameter particles (CMD >0.3 ym) which attach according to the diffusion theory. In contrast, the kinetic theory becomes more inaccurate as the aerosol becomes more polydisperse.
The kinetic-diffusion approximation predicts an attachment coefficient similar to the hybrid theory for all CMDs and for both Og m 2 and 3 (Figs. 3 and 4). The advantage of this theory is that the average attachment coefficient can be calculated from an analytical solution numerical techniques are not required. [Pg.161]

Equations (/I) through (74) are absolute sensitivity coefficients. Similarly, we can develop expressions for the sensitivity of D°pt ... [Pg.25]

Calculations of vibrational spectra of bent triatomic molecules with second order Hamiltonians produce results with accuracies of the order of 1-5 cm-1. An example is shown in Table 4.9. These results should again be compared with those of a Dunham expansion with cubic terms [Eq. (0.1)]. An example of such an expansion for the bent S02 molecule is given in Table 0.1. Note that because the Hamiltonian (4.96) has fewer parameters, it establishes definite numerical relations between the many Dunham coefficients similar to the so-called x — K relations (Mills and Robiette, 1985). For example, to the lowest order in l/N one has for the symmetric XY2 case the energies E(vu v2, V3) given by... [Pg.107]

A concentration-fluctuation correlation coefficient, similar to that proposed by Danckwerts (D3, D5), may be defined. [Pg.149]

In this connection, it is very interesting that the volume and intrachain changes obtained by various experimental methods 24,29,85) [Eq. (101)] agree well with Eq. (56) following from the Tobolsky-Shen semiempirical equation of state or the related phenomenological Eq. (76). The values of y determined from the data are rather small (0.1-0.3). As has been mentioned above, according to the semiempirical approach by Tobolsky and Shen one can formally suggest that the front-factor in Eq. (28) is pressure dependent. If it is really so, then the parameter y for rubbers can be considered as an experimental coefficient similar to the coefficient of thermal expansion and compressibility 29). [Pg.65]

Both theoretical analysis and dipole moment measurements indicated that sulfonyl-substituted compounds may have ft coefficients similar in magnitude to their nitro analogues. Therefore, we have measured p for several sulfonyl- and nitro-substituted compounds using electric-field-induced second-harmonic generation method (EFISH) (11,25). In this experiment, one measures an effective third-order nonlinearity rEFISH for a solution containing the compound of interest, given by... [Pg.187]

A large, immediate increase in the friction coefficient, similar to water application, that follows with a slow decrease in the friction coefficient. These agents can be interpreted to act by immediate hydration of the skin through some aqueous means to give the immediate increase in friction. In Figure 32.4, creams A, B, and C represent this type of lubricant/moisturizer. [Pg.437]

The FDS5 pyrolysis model is used here to qualitatively illustrate the complexity associated with material property estimation. Each condensed-phase species (i.e., virgin wood, char, ash, etc.) must be characterized in terms of its bulk density, thermal properties (thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity, both of which are usually temperature-dependent), emissivity, and in-depth radiation absorption coefficient. Similarly, each condensed-phase reaction must be quantified through specification of its kinetic triplet (preexponential factor, activation energy, reaction order), heat of reaction, and the reactant/product species. For a simple charring material with temperature-invariant thermal properties that degrades by a single-step first order reaction, this amounts to -11 parameters that must be specified (two kinetic parameters, one heat of reaction, two thermal conductivities, two specific heat capacities, two emissivities, and two in-depth radiation absorption coefficients). [Pg.567]

To be considered a promising candidate for high-temperature applications, an adhesive must provide all the usual functions necessary for good adhesion (wettability, low shrinkage on cure, thermal expansion coefficient similar to that of the substrate, toughness, etc.), and it must also possess... [Pg.299]

For example, when we consider the design of specialty chemical, polymer, biological, electronic materials, etc. processes, the separation units are usually described by transport-limited models, rather than the thermodynamically limited models encountered in petrochemical processes (flash drums, plate distillations, plate absorbers, extractions, etc.). Thus, from a design perspective, we need to estimate vapor-liquid-solid equilibria, as well as transport coefficients. Similarly, we need to estimate reaction kinetic models for all kinds of reactors, for example, chemical, polymer, biological, and electronic materials reactors, as well as crystallization kinetics, based on the molecular structures of the components present. Furthermore, it will be necessary to estimate constitutive equations for the complex materials we will encounter in new processes. [Pg.537]

The concept of measuring such rates is not new, particularly in the pharmaceutical field. Van de Waterbeemd [14] measured rates of transfer of various drugs from octanol to water and empirically related these rates to the partition coefficient. Similarly Brodin [15], using a different experimental method, obtained rates of transfer for another series of compounds between cyclohexane and water. The rotating diffusion cell has been introduced for similar purposes [16-18]. It is necessary to look into the broader background of liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, in order to illustrate aspects of the issues under consideration. The subject has been reviewed in part by Noble [19]. [Pg.163]

There are, however, two disadvantages of derivatives. First, they are computationally intense, as a fresh calculation is required for each datapoint in a spectrum or chromatogram. Second, and most importantly, they amplify noise substantially, and, therefore, require low signal to noise ratios. These limitations can be overcome by using Savitsky-Golay coefficients similar to those described in Section 3.3.1.2, which involve rapid calculation of smoothed higher derivatives. The coefficients for a number of window sizes and approximations are presented in Table 3.6. This is a common method for the determination of derivatives and is implemented in many software packages. [Pg.138]

The mechanism of 4-chloroaniline photochemistry was independently studied by Guizzardi et al. in organic solvents they reached very similar conclusions [57]. These authors pointed out that the aminophenyl cation has a triplet-diradical character which fully explains its reactivity in organic solvents [57]. However, in aqueous solutions the cation reacted with hydroxyl ions with a rate constant of 3.1 x 1010 M s, which can only be interpreted as a deprotonation reaction [55]. The carbene 4-iminocyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene thus must exist in aqueous solutions, even though its properties have not yet been characterized. This is partly due to an expected low extinction coefficient, similar to the neutral anilino radical [55]. Following these arguments, the primary pathways of 4-chloroaniline photolysis in polar solvents may be pictured as shown in Scheme 7. [Pg.176]

For turbulence it is convenient to describe particle flux in terms of an eddy diffusion coefficient, similar to a molecular diffusion coefficient. Unlike a molecular diffusion coefficient, however, the eddy diffusion coefficient is not constant for a given temperature and particle mobility, but decreases as the eddy approaches a surface. As particles are moved closer and closer to a surface by turbulence, the magnitude of their fluctuations to and from that surface diminishes, finally reaching a point where molecular diffusion predominates. As a result, in turbulent deposition, turbulence establishes a uniform aerosol concentration that extends to somewhere within the viscous sublayer. Then molecular diffusion or particle inertia transports the particles the rest of the way to the surface. [Pg.92]

Equation (6.171) shows the direct relation between the electrical conductance of the solution and the phenomenological coefficient. Similar relations are obtained by measuring the fraction of the total current that is carried by each ion, also under the conditions V/li, = 0. This fraction is called the Hittorf transference number (t,) and is expressed by... [Pg.341]

Nucleophiles attack C-6, since this is the site of highest LUMO coefficient. Similarly, nucleophilic 4 n addends should cycloadd across the 2 and 6 positions, with the more nucleophilic end of the 4 rr addend attacking C-6. By contrast, electrophiles attack C-2, the site of highest HOMO coefficient, and electrophilic 4 n addends can only add across C-2 and C-3, due to the node at C-6. The presence of the second highest occupied MO (SHOMO) of the fulvene complicates this simple picture, and substituents may drastically change the HOMO shape, as described below. Nevertheless, this picture does help explain, at least qualitatively, the varying periselec-tivity of diene and 1,3-dipole cycloadditions to fulvenes. [Pg.35]

Equations 6.5 and 6.6 for the segment coefficients look rather formidable, but are in fact quite simple and very easy to remember and apply. The numerator of Aok, the forward coefficient, is the product of all forward X coefficients similarly, the numerator of Ak0, the reverse coefficient, is the product of all reverse X coefficients. The denominator Z)0k, common to both segment coefficients, is easily obtained with the following recipe ... [Pg.123]


See other pages where Similarity coefficients is mentioned: [Pg.154]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.1382]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.594]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.3323]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.106]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.304 , Pg.308 ]




SEARCH



Jaccard similarity coefficient

Mass transfer coefficient regime similarity

Molecular similarity analysis functions/coefficients

Similar property principle similarity coefficient

Similarity coefficients, mechanism

Similarity coefficients, mechanism comparison

Similarity measures correlation coefficient

Tanimoto similarity coefficients

© 2024 chempedia.info