Sequential solutions operating equations

The essential differences between sequential-modular and equation-oriented simulators are ia the stmcture of the computer programs (5) and ia the computer time that is required ia getting the solution to a problem. In sequential-modular simulators, at the top level, the executive program accepts iaput data, determines the dow-sheet topology, and derives and controls the calculation sequence for the unit operations ia the dow sheet. The executive then passes control to the unit operations level for the execution of each module. Here, specialized procedures for the unit operations Hbrary calculate mass and energy balances for a particular unit. FiaaHy, the executive and the unit operations level make frequent calls to the physical properties Hbrary level for the routine tasks, enthalpy calculations, and calculations of phase equiHbria and other stream properties. The bottom layer is usually transparent to the user, although it may take 60 to 80% of the calculation efforts. 

Equality constraints. The Eduljee correlation involves two parameters Rm, the minimum reflux ratio, and Nm, the equivalent number of stages to accomplish the separation at total reflux. His operating equations relate N, a, XF, XD, and XB (see Table El2.4A for notation) all of which have known values except XB as listed in Table E12.4A. Once R is specified, you can find XB by sequential solution of the three following equations. 

For a many-spin system, the solution of Equation (4.6) becomes very complicated and the individual coupling frequencies d cannot always be extracted from experimental data. Nevertheless, the sum polarization 2, S,j. remains time invariant and is called a constant of the motion. In principle, we must describe the time evolution of an initial nonequilibrium state tr(0) = 2, c,(0)S, as a series of rotations of the density operator in the Hilbert space of the entire spin system. At times t > 0 not only populations but also many-spin terms of the form riA S jnmSmri S appear in the density operator. Of course, this time evolution is fully deterministic and reversible. The reversibility was in fact demonstrated in the polarization-echo experiments [10] (Fig. 4.2) where two sequential time evolutions with a scaling factor of s =1 and s = -1/2 follow each other (see Equation (4.5)). If the second period has twice the length of the first period, the time evolution under the dipolar interaction is refocused and the density operator returns to the initial density operator. 

The older modular simulation mode, on the other hand, is more common in commerical applications. Here process equations are organized within their particular unit operation. Solution methods that apply to a particular unit operation solve the unit model and pass the resulting stream information to the next unit. Thus, the unit operation represents a procedure or module in the overall flowsheet calculation. These calculations continue from unit to unit, with recycle streams in the process updated and converged with new unit information. Consequently, the flow of information in the simulation systems is often analogous to the flow of material in the actual process. Unlike equation-oriented simulators, modular simulators solve smaller sets of equations, and the solution procedure can be tailored for the particular unit operation. However, because the equations are embedded within procedures, it becomes difficult to provide problem specifications where the information flow does not parallel that of the flowsheet. The earliest modular simulators (the sequential modular type) accommodated these specifications, as well as complex recycle loops, through inefficient iterative procedures. The more recent simultaneous modular simulators now have efficient convergence capabilities for handling multiple recycles and nonconventional problem specifications in a coordinated manner. 

Easterby proposed a generalized theory of the transition time for sequential enzyme reactions where the steady-state production of product is preceded by a lag period or transition time during which the intermediates of the sequence are accumulating. He found that if a steady state is eventually reached, the magnitude of this lag may be calculated, even when the differentiation equations describing the process have no analytical solution. The calculation may be made for simple systems in which the enzymes obey Michaehs-Menten kinetics or for more complex pathways in which intermediates act as modifiers of the enzymes. The transition time associated with each intermediate in the sequence is given by the ratio of the appropriate steady-state intermediate concentration to the steady-state flux. The theory is also applicable to the transition between steady states produced by flux changes. Apphcation of the theory to coupled enzyme assays makes it possible to define the minimum requirements for successful operation of a coupled assay. The theory can be extended to deal with sequences in which the enzyme concentration exceeds substrate concentration. 

In operationally defined speciation the physical or chemical fractionation procedure applied to the sample defines the fraction isolated for measurement. For example, selective sequential extraction procedures are used to isolate metals associated with the water/acid soluble , exchangeable , reducible , oxidisable and residual fractions in a sediment. The reducible, oxidisable and residual fractions, for example, are often equated with the metals associated, bound or adsorbed in the iron/manganese oxyhydroxide, organic matter/sulfide and silicate phases, respectively. While this is often a convenient concept it must be emphasised that these associations are nominal and can be misleading. It is, therefore, sounder to regard the isolated fractions as defined by the operational procedure. Physical procedures such as the division of a solid sample into particle-size fractions or the isolation of a soil solution by filtration, centrifugation or dialysis are also examples of operational speciation. Indeed even the distinction between soluble and insoluble species in aquatic systems can be considered as operational speciation as it is based on the somewhat arbitrary definition of soluble as the ability to pass a 0.45/Am filter. 

In the equation-based approach, the equations for all units are collected and solved simultaneously. The natural decomposition of the system into its constituent unit operations is therefore lost. Moreover, the simultaneous solution of large numbers of equations, some of which may be nonlinear, can be a cumbersome and time-consuming problem, even for a powerful computer. For all these reasons, most commercial simulation programs were still based on the sequential modular approach when this text was written. 

---