Separation of solvents from water

This is becoming truer since the cheapest way of removing many low-boiling solvents from waste water has been by air stripping or evaporation from effluent ponds or interceptor surfaces. Such avoidable contributions to VOC will become increasingly unacceptable as standards for air quality are raised. This also applies to marine dumping since volatile solvents are mostly evaporated before degradation takes place. 

The choice of processes leading to possible recovery of solvents from dilute solutions are  

The approach to cleaning up water effluent is very diiferent to the drying of solvents, although water cleaning will often yield solvents to be dried before reuse and the economics of the two processes involved will be interlinked. It is not the intention here to describe the various methods for dealing with effluent streams except where they impact upon the recovery of the solvents removed from the effluents. 

In general, the standards of purity set for water are much stricter than those required for recovered solvents (Table 3.1). Except in cases where water or some other impurity actually reacts with the reagents in a synthesis, impurity levels in recovered solvents are in the region 0.1-1.0% (1000-10 000ppm). The standards for water purity can be set for several reasons, namely to avoid  

It is impossible to set a level of purity applicable to aU discharges when the variety of sizes, disposal destinations and regulatory authorities is so great. The examples quoted in Table 3.1 indicate some of the standards that are required. 

---

Table 3.8 Correction factors for vapour pressure of solvents Separation of solvents from water over dilute aqueous solutions 37... 

The efficiency of separation of solvent from solute varies with their nature and the rate of flow of liquid from the HPLC into the interface. Volatile solvents like hexane can be evaporated quickly and tend not to form large clusters, and therefore rates of flow of about 1 ml/min can be accepted from the HPLC apparatus. For less-volatile solvents like water, evaporation is slower, clusters are less easily broken down, and maximum flow rates are about 0.1-0.5 ml/min. Because separation of solvent from solute depends on relative volatilities and rates of diffusion, the greater the molecular mass difference between them, the better is the efficiency of separation. Generally, HPLC is used for substances that are nonvolatile or are thermally labile, as they would otherwise be analyzed by the practically simpler GC method the nonvolatile substances usually have molecular masses considerably larger than those of commonly used HPLC solvents, so separation is good. 

Modem solvent extraction plants recover over 99.9% of the solvent pumped to the extractor. The solvent recovery system includes solvent and water vapor condensation, solvent-water separation, stripping solvent from water and air effluent streams, as well as heating the solvent prior to reuse in the extractor. 

Achieving the required separation of solvent from residue at the safe operating temperature is likely to involve the use of reduced pressure, particularly towards the end of a batch when the mole fraction of volatile solvent becomes low and that of the involatile residue becomes high. Because this situation is present all the time in a continuous operation, it is likely to be under vacuum. This presents no insuperable problem for handling solvents with high boiling points since it is still possible to condense their vapours with cooling water or ambient air with an adequate temperature diiference in the condenser. 

Of great industrial importance is the separation of substances from water by solvent extraction. Some solvents technically used for these processes are hsted in Table 6.1-1. Obviously, the selection of the solvent strongly depends on the transfer component. 

The phenomenon of solvent transport through solid barriers has three aspects which discussed under the heading of permeability. These are the permeation of solvent through materials (films, containers, etc.) the use of pervaporation membranes to separate organic solvents from water or water from solvents the manufacture of permeate selective membranes. 

Recovery techniques exist for the separation of solvents from solids, residues, liquids, including water, and from gases. These are achieved by such technologies as decanting, distillation, liquid-liquid extraction, condensation, adsorption and absorption. In many instances several processes are used in series to achieve the most efficient recovery, or desired quality, from the recovered solvent. A summary of the principal technologies used in solvent recovery is discussed below. 

Other methods suitable for the separation of solvents and water are the use of air or steam to strip out the solvent from the aqueous phase [19]. 

Purification of solvent. This may involve the removal of water as in the case of furfural, the separation of solvents from one another in case... 

Separation and Purification of Isomers. 1-Butene and isobutylene caimot be economically separated into pure components by conventional distHlation because they are close boiling isomers (see Table 1 and Eig. 1). 2-Butene can be separated from the other two isomers by simple distHlation. There are four types of separation methods avaHable (/) selective removal of isobutylene by polymeriza tion and separation of 1-butene (2) use of addition reactions with alcohol, acids, or water to selectively produce pure isobutylene and 1-butene (3) selective extraction of isobutylene with a Hquid solvent, usuaHy an acid and (4) physical separation of isobutylene from 1-butene by absorbents. The first two methods take advantage of the reactivity of isobutylene. Eor example, isobutylene reacts about 1000 times faster than 1-butene. Some 1-butene also reacts and gets separated with isobutylene, but recovery of high purity is possible. The choice of a particular method depends on the product slate requirements of the manufacturer. In any case, 2-butene is first separated from the other two isomers by simple distHlation. 

Adsorption, which utilizes the ability of a solid adsorbent to adsorb specific components from a gaseous or a liquid solution onto its surface. Examples of adsorption include the use of granular activated carbon for the removal of ben-zene/toluene/xylene mixtures from underground water, the separation of ketones from aqueous wastes of an oil refinery, aad the recovery of organic solvents from the exhaust gases of polymer manufacturing facilities. Other examples include the use of activated alumina to adsorb fluorides and arsenic from metal-finishing emissions. 

Chemical separations may first be accomplished by partitioning on the basis of polarity into a series of solvents from non-polar hexane to very polar compounds like methanol. Compounds may also be separated by molecular size, charge, or adsorptive characteristics, etc. Various chromatography methods are utilized, including columns, thin layer (TLC) gas-liquid (GLC), and more recently, high pressure liquid (HPLC) systems. HPLC has proven particularly useful for separations of water soluble compounds from relatively crude plant extracts. Previously, the major effort toward compound identification involved chemical tests to detect specific functional groups, whereas characterization is now usually accomplished by using a... 

Freitag and John [96] studied rapid separation of stabilisers from plastics. Fairly quantitative extraction (>90% of the expected content) of stabilisers from a powdered polymer was achieved by MAE within 3 to 6 min, as compared to 16 h of Soxhlet extraction for the same recovery. MAE and Soxhlet extraction have also been compared in the analysis of cyclic trimer in PET [113]. On the other hand, Ganzler et al. [128] compared the extraction yields for various types of compounds from nonpolymeric matrices for microwave irradiation with those obtained by the traditional Soxhlet or shake-flask extraction methods. Microwave extraction was more effective than the conventional methods, in particular in the case of polar compounds. As expected, the efficiency of the former is high especially when the extraction solvents contain water. With the high dipole moment of water, microwave heating is more... 

Evaporation of the water gave a partially crystalline mass which was dissolved in methanol. Evaporation of the methanol yielded a thick paste, from which more solvent was removed by pressing it between filter paper. After several repetitions of this procedure the product sintered somewhat about 100°, but had no sharp melting point. It was then recrystaliized by evaporation of solvent from its solution, first in alcohol and then in acetic acid. The crystalline material thus obtained melted at 113-114.5° and gave good analytical values, but a purer product resulted from the treatment of a methanolic solution of this material with enough ether to form a second layer. A reddish flocculent precipitate was separated and after evaporation of the alcohol, crystals melting at 116-117.5° were obtained. 

Some of the disadvantages of the Stille reaction, e. g. the low reactivity of some substrates, separation difficulties in chromatography, and the toxicity of tin compounds, have been ameliorated by recent efforts to improve the procedure. Curran has, in a series of papers, reported the development of the concept of fluorous chemistry, in which the special solubility properties of perfluorinated or partly fluorinated reagents and solvents are put to good use [45]. In short, fluorinated solvents are well known for their insolubility in standard organic solvents or water. If a compound contains a sufficient number of fluorine atoms it will partition to the fluorous phase, if such a phase is present. An extraction procedure would thus give rise to a three-phase solution enabling ready separation of fluorinated from nonfluorinated compounds. 

It is desirable that the equilibrium constant for a solute be not zero or very large lest there be no net retention or near infinite retention. The catch comes in the fact that liquids, which are relatively good solvents for a given type of molecule are also solvents for each other. This means the risk involved is by washing off the stationary phase with the mobile phase. Yet liquid-liquid methods offer much promise for relatively nonvolatile but soluble molecules and their separation of one from the other. The discovery of liquid-liquid chromatography earned Martin and Synge the Nobel Prize when they applied it to amino acids with water mobile phases and organic liquid stationary phases. 

Size-exclusion chromatography combined with RP-HPLC-MS was employed for the separation of pyranoanthocyanins from red wine. Wine samples (10 ml) were acidified with 3 M HC1 to pH 1 then sodium bisulphite was added at a concentration of 400 g/1. After 15 min reaction time the treated wine was loaded into a gel column (200 X 15 mm i.d.). Pigments were eluted with 95 per cent ethanol followed with 100 per cent methanol. The various fractions were acidified to pH 1, concentrated and redissolved in water. HPLC-DAD was carried out in an ODS column (150 X 4.6 mm i.d. particle size 5 /nn) at 35°C. Solvents were 0.1 per cent aqueous TFA (A) and ACN (B). The gradient started with 10 per cent B for 5 min to 15 per cent B for 15 min isocratic for 5 min to 18 per cent B for 5 min to 35 per cent B for 20 min. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min and analytes were detected at 520 nm. MS conditions were sheath and auxiliary gas were a mixture of nitrogen and... 

---