Selectivity, catalyst poisons

Each precious metal or base metal oxide has unique characteristics, and the correct metal or combination of metals must be selected for each exhaust control appHcation. The metal loading of the supported metal oxide catalysts is typically much greater than for nobel metals, because of the lower inherent activity pet exposed atom of catalyst. This higher overall metal loading, however, can make the system more tolerant of catalyst poisons. Some compounds can quickly poison the limited sites available on the noble metal catalysts (19). 

Contrary to the expectation that a sulfur-containing substituent will be a catalyst poison, a phenylthio group serves as an effective selectivity control element in TMM cycloadditions. A single regioisomer (30) was obtained from the carbonate precursor (31) in good yield. The thermodynamically more stable sulfide (32) is readily accessible from (30) via a 1,3-sulfide shift catalyzed by PhSSPh. A wide array of synthetically useful intermediates could be prepared from the sulfides (30) and (32) with simple transformations (Scheme 2.10) [20]. 

Under relatively mild conditions the Ru/C catalyst poisoned with Sn (lines 1 and 2), the Ir/C catalyst (lines 14 and 15), and the Raney-cobalt catalyst modified with CoCl2 (line 19) seem likely systems to try when initiating a search for an effective method for selectively hydrogenating the C=0 bond in an a, 3-unsaturated aldehyde. 

Promoters may influence selectivity by poisoning undesired reactions or by increasing the rates of desired intermediate reactions so as to increase the yield of the desired product. If they act in the first sense, they are sometimes referred to as inhibitors. An example of this type of action involves the addition of halogen compounds to the catalyst used for oxidizing ethylene to ethylene oxide (silver supported on alumina). The halogens prevent complete oxidation of the ethylene to carbon dioxide and water, thus permitting the use of this catalyst for industrial purposes. 

In addition to the universal concern for catalytic selectivity, the following reasons could be advanced to argue why an electrochemical scheme would be preferred over a thermal approach (i) There are experimental parameters (pH, solvent, electrolyte, potential) unique only to the electrode-solution interface which can be manipulated to dictate a certain reaction pathway, (ii) The presence of solvent and supporting electrolyte may sufficiently passivate the electrode surface to minimize catalytic fragmentation of starting materials. (iii) Catalyst poisons due to reagent decomposition may form less readily at ambient temperatures, (iv) The chemical behavior of surface intermediates formed in electrolytic solutions can be closely modelled after analogous well-characterized molecular or cluster complexes (1-8). (v)... 

Table 4 lists a few selected catalysts for the SRE reaction in the middle temperature range, between 450 and 600 °C and high temperature range, above 600 °C. Under these conditions, the listed catalysts produce relatively large amounts of CO which is a poison to the PEM fuel cells. These catalytic processes would therefore require a multi-stage CO clean-up process in the downstream in order to produce pure H2 suitable for fuel cells. 

Because of its lower temperature and special polymer electrolyte membrane, the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) is well-suited for transportation, portable, and micro fuel cell applications. But the performance of these fuel cells critically depends on the materials used for the various cell components. Durability, water management, and reducing catalyst poisoning are important factors when selecting PEMFC materials. 

Seignette salt See potassium sodium tartrate. sen yet, s6lt selective inhibition See selective poisoning. sl lek tlv. In a bish-an selective poisoning chem Retardation of the rate of one catalyzed reaction more than that of another by the use of a catalyst poison. Also known as selective inhibition. si lek-tiv poiz-an-it) ... 

As an application of Pt nanowires in heterogeneous catalysis, we performed preferential oxidation (PROX) of CO as a test reaction [32]. The PROX reaction is useful for PEM fuel cells for the selective removal of contaminating CO from hydrogen gas, because CO works as a strong catalyst poison for Pt electrode catalysts (Figure 15.24). H2 produced in steam-reforming and the water-gas shift reaction needs further to be purified in the PROX reaction to selectively oxidize a few% CO towards inert CO2 in a H 2-rich atmosphere, to reduce the CO content to <10ppm. Under the PROX conditions, the facile oxidation of H2 to H2O may also occur, thus the catalyst selectivity for CO oxidation over H2 oxidation is an... 

The importance of catalyst stability is often underestimated not only in academia but also in many sectors of industry, notably in the fine chemicals industry, where high selectivities are the main objective (1). Catalyst deactivation is inevitable, but it can be retarded and some of its consequences avoided (2). Deactivation itself is a complex phenomenon. For instance, active sites might be poisoned by feed impurities, reactants, intermediates and products (3). Other causes of catalyst deactivation are particle sintering, metal and support leaching, attrition and deposition of inactive materials on the catalyst surface (4). Catalyst poisons are usually substances, whose interaction with the active surface sites is very strong and irreversible, whereas inhibitors generally weakly and reversibly adsorb on the catalyst surface. Selective poisons are sometimes used intentionally to adjust the selectivity of a particular reaction (2). 

---