Security laboratory

Information Communication Systems Security Laboratory Department of Information Communication Systems Engineering University of the Aegean Karlovassi GR-83200 ska aegean.gr... 

The former Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Security Research and Development effort is now the Transportation Security Laboratory (TSL). 

In smaller or less secure laboratories, checkpoints are established by locking all access doors—i.e., only those with a key may enter. In a more security-conscious laboratory complex, each area or room in the facility is individually controlled with a computer-activated system. The computer system can identify the person who enters, log entry and exit times and give management the ability to restrict unnecessary or unscheduled access (e.g., entry late at night). Each room has a list of approved access personnel, and only those personnel will be able to enter by use of their magnetic or bar-coded personal ID card. 

The effectiveness of a security program is closely related to the expectations established by management. All laboratory personnel should be encouraged to question the presence of unfamiliar people in laboratories and to report suspicious activity immediately. Locking laboratory doors when laboratories are unoccupied should become routine. COCs that are not being used should be secured. Laboratory managers should establish a policy that prohibits all unauthorized use of laboratory materials and facilities, and that violations will be subject to a penalty. 

A training program in laboratory security should set out the expectations of management and the need to maintain a safe and secure laboratory environment. Training should be conducted periodically and especially for new personnel. Laboratories should be inspected routinely for compliance with security measures. Personnel working in laboratories should follow all established security procedures, and there should be a protocol for reporting security breaches or security concerns. 

There are many ways to measure these properties and some of them are proprietary. However, most laboratory tests are standardized by American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM). Many of them are interactive to various degrees. The rate and state of vulcanization is especially important to consider for components of heavier and thicker tines. The heat used to vulcanize the tine in a mold under pressure requites time to penetrate from both sides of the giant tine to the innermost portions. Securing a balanced state of cure, ie, the maximizing of physical properties in all the components, results in the innermost components having a faster rate of cure. The peripheral compounds should have a cure system which holds its physical properties well when overcured. 

Annual iadirect costs are estimated as percentages of the direct labor and fixed capital costs. Typical direct labor percentage ranges are 25—30% for payroll overhead, 15—20% for stores and suppHes, 10—20% for control laboratory, 10—20% for security, 10% for yard, and 10—15% for process improvements. That is, total iadirect costs are usually 80—115% of the direct labor cost (1). 

In reaction engineering, laboratory catal54ic reactors are tools or instruments to study how catalysts behave in some desired reaction. Quantitatively, the investigator wants to know how much of the desired product can be made per unit weight of catalyst, how much raw material will be used, and what byproducts will be made. This is the basic information needed to estimate the costs and profitability of the process. The economic consequence of our estimates also forces us to clarify what the rate limiting steps are, and how much transfer processes influence the rates, i.e., everything that is needed for a secure scale-up. Making the... 

Critics contend that the laboratories arc bureaucratically bloated and inefficient, citing numerous indepetideiit reports and audits over the last few decades warning that DOE ownership and operation does not work well. Bureaucracy has made it difficult for the laboratories to generate and carry out a viable mission. And following the Chinese spy scandal of 1999, the DOE has also been widely faulted for a failure to ensure the proper security at its weapons labs. 

In some instances it may be possible, though it is usually very difficult, to undertake laboratory corrosion tests under conditions that will be the same as those encountered in some practical application, and thus to secure some directly applicable data. More often, the conditions of service are so variable or so difficult to appraise accurately and duplicate in the laboratory that it is impractical and probably unwise to attempt to do so. A better procedure is to examine the individual effects of the several controlling factors by varying them one at a time so as to provide a picture of their influence on the... 

---