Seal leaks analysis

The report presents the findings from the analysis of the RCP failures. Estimates of the annual frequency for the spectrum of leak rates induced by RCP seal failures and their impact on plant safety (contribution to coremelt frequency) are made. The safety impact of smaller RCP seal leaks was assessed qualitatively, whereas for leaks above the normal makeup capacity, formal PRA methodologies were applied. Also included are the life distribution of RCP seals and the conditional leak rate distributions, given a RCP seal failure the contribution of various root causes and estimates for the dependency factors and the failure intensity for the different combinations of pump designers and plant vendors. 

There are defect limits that are associated with random failure modes. For example, if there is a leak from a mechanical seal on a pump, where do we decide that the leakage is excessive and requires immediate maintenance Vibration analysis severity levels are also typical examples of when do we have severe enough conditions to warrant equipment shutdown and overhaul. In such circumstances, the defect limit is dependent upon individual subjective judgment. 

Girardon et al. (2005) discussed a transmission XAFS spectroscopy cell that is compatible with characterization of catalysts in the working state and with online analysis of reaction products. The cell consists of several plates of stainless steel and boron nitride linked together with graphite seals. The catalyst powder is held in a recessed channel in a central boron nitride plate. The cell is heated with cartridge heaters, and the thermocouple is placed in a channel in the central boron nitride block close to the catalyst bed. Gas flow is through the catalyst bed from top to bottom. The volume of this bed (0.45 cm3) is fixed by the dimensions of the recessed channel in the boron nitride plate—but it can be adjusted by having several different plates of different dimensions. The authors claimed that the cell is leak free and operational at temperatures up to 623 K in O2 and 673 K in H2, all at atmospheric pressure. 

Seal analysis based on the assumption that juxtaposition analysis (i.e., construction of Allan diagrams, clay smear assessment and leaking sand/sand contacts) would only have been successful in -40% of the cases studied. 

For example, the NADP/NTN allows extraction of a few milliliters for the field determination of pH and conductivity. Immediately after the aliquot has been withdrawn, the sample is sealed and then shipped to a central laboratory for further chemical analysis. Shipment of the sample is an important consideration for any type of sampling program since one must be sure that the collecting vessel does not leak in transit. 

The two-way stopcock allows the gas to flow either into analysis vessel B or into reaction vessel 0. It is best to lubricate it with PsO, which is then converted to HPO 3. To prevent too rapid liquefaction of the acid (which would produce a leak), ordinary stopcock grease is applied at the top and bottom rim of the stopcock. Stopcocks which close at the bottom are also very useful. All other stopcocks in the apparatus can be sealed with ordinary stopcock grease. 

The simplicity of sample preparation is one of the main advantages of the technique. Solids, liquids, and even gases are analyzed directly as received with no prior treatment. The sample is sealed in a suitable container, usually of polyethylene or quartz glass, and placed in the irradiation position in the reactor. When quantitative analysis is carried out with chemical standards, it is necessary to ensure that the samples have a constant geometry for irradiation and y-ray spectrometry. Samples are therefore used in powder form or as chunks of uniform shape and thickness. In the case of liquids, identical volumes must be used to provide consistent geometry and great care is required to ensure that no leaks occur in the irradiation site. Reactor operators have strict control over samples allowed in the irradiation devices and hazardous materials will not be permitted. 

Hazard Condition Item 2 Loss of Hydraulic Pressure. A small leak in the hydraulic cylinder system woidd result in a loss of pressure in the cylinder and a subsequent inability to maintain constant cyUnder volmne. Any damage to the cylinder jackhead would cause a leak of hydrauhc oil from the cylinder system. Such damage is possible because of an abrupt contact with the plunger mechanism and/or a failure in the neoprene seal between the jackhead and the plunger. The system safety analyst has learned from the preliminary hazard analysis report that there is no provision for oil recovery in the event of damage to the jackhead. 

A common observation concerning oil inclusion abundance is that paleo-oil columns are common not only below current oil columns, but also in wells that are completely dry at present. For example, in the Timor Sea region of northern Australia, there was an extensive period of fault-seal breach of oil reservoirs during Late Miocene/Early Pliocene fault reactivation, and this left many paleo-oil columns in the presently water-filled reservoir sections [28,128]. In dry wells, the analysis of fluid inclusion oils offers the possibility of understanding a petroleum system without having access to current fluids in the reservoir [49,55,129], and potentially then being able to predict where the oil may have leaked to, or where it may be trapped in nonbreached structures. 

Barriers/Controls 5) All tubing and/or equipment connections have been field welded to ensure an adequate seal. System is visually inspected on an annual basis and hydrostatically leak tested every 5 years. Controlled Risk Assessment 5) Barriers/controls considered adequate. The addition of a dye-penetrant analysis of all field joints would further reduce the possibility of hazard risk exposure. Enforced No Smoking policies around oxygen panels by the hospital staff and the patients will also decrease the risk potential. A Controlled RAC of2E is assigned. 

The effect of gas leaks on cell tests may be separated into two components a loss of driving potential (Emf) caused by O2 entering to convert H2 to H2O, and a volumetric loss of fuel affecting the fuel utilisation, caused by a pressure gradient versus the ambient. A gas leak may be before, in, or after the cell in a test set-up fuel line. Leaks before the cell affect the intended fuel composition and quantity. However, a true average fuel composition may be obtained from the cell OCV. Leaks after the cell are of no importance to the ceil test, unless off-gas analysis is carried out. Leaks in the cell or in seals cause inhomogeneous gas composition over the cell, even at OCV. 

---