Sampling soil disturbed

Hand augers of all kinds can be used to extract soil samples from holes up to 20 feet and more. Motor driven augers can go much deeper. All such samples are disturbed, and may even be mixed from different strata. 

Subsurface soil samples are important, however, if soil disturbance is likely or if leaching of chemicals to ground water is of concern, or if the site has current or potential agricultural uses. For subsurface testing, depths of one to two feet can be used. Another item of concern is the determination of the types of samples to be collected. Basically, two types of samples may be collected at a site grab and composite. Grab samples represent a single part of a medium collected at a specific location and time. Composite samples (sometimes referred to as continuous samples for air) combine subsamples from different locations and/or times. Composite samples may misrepresent or dilute concentrations at specific points and, therefore, should be avoided as the only inputs to a risk assessment. 

G. Matschonat and R. Vogt, Equilibrium solution composition and exchange properties of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples from an acid fore.st soil. Plant Soil I83 l (1996). 

The guiding principles in test plot maintenance are to (1) minimize soil surface disturbance at all times, (2) ensure that control and treated plots are similarly maintained, (3) avoid applying other agrochemicals that may interfere with sample analysis or that are otherwise contrary to the purpose of the study, (4) follow the prescribed irrigation policy determined for the study site, and (5) keep bare-soil test plots free of vegetation, as follows. 

In Table 7, a comparison of actual measurements, and also two well-known pedo-transfer functions, can be found by depth. It is important to note that there is a large difference in water content between the disturbed soil core samples and the undisturbed samples. Additionally, the two pedo-transfer functions also exhibit a large difference in predicted water content. Therefore, when doing calculations or trying... 

To investigate a vertical distribution of a chemical, a sediment column is divided into sections with appropriate thickness. The sediment column taken in a pipe should be refrigerated in an ice-cooled container, transported to the laboratory, and removed carefully on to a clean tray so that there is as little disturbance as possible to the soil core structure. In the case of a column in which there is little soil moisture and it tends to collapse, the soil should be pushed out to each required thickness and carved off. It is also possible to take a sediment column up to a 30-cm depth using a pipe that is connected to cylinders (5-cm height) with sealing tape. In this case, the sample in each 5-cm fraction can be obtained as it is, after removing the tape. 

The collection of physical evidence is not generally considered time sensitive however, site characterization and sampling activities are time sensitive due to the public health implications of contaminated environmental media air, water, and/or soil. Thus, collection of environmental media samples may precede collection of physical evidence, and care must be taken not to disturb the crime scene while performing these activities. If samples can be collected outside of the boundaries of the suspected crime scene, this may avoid concerns about the integrity of the crime scene. 

During this step, a preliminary analysis of the parts is performed. Typically, the focus is a visual examination of the items. The investigators should avoid disturbing data until necessary, conducting their visual examination without alterations. Take pictures of the items and mark positions in the field if immediate removal is necessary. Remove the parts in a controlled, careful, and methodical manner. Evaluate the importance of coatings/residues/deposits/impurities. Samples of the chemicals, soil, deposits, and coatings may be taken at this point. 

For each soil type, the leachate was collected from one of the treated small containers being used to grow grass. These were considered the most suitable because the underlying soil was not going to be disturbed after the crop had been sown. The volume of leachate was measured so that a total flux of tritium out of the container could be estimated. In most cases, analyses were confined to total tritium, but for a few samples the tritiated water content was also measured. The total tritium lost into leachate from the containers over the 2005 season is summarised in Table 4. 

One type of probe is a hand-held stainless-steel hollow auger, which has soil-air vent holes drilled into the shaft near the bottom and is fitted with a gas sample port near the top (Lovell, 1979). Another type of hollow probe has a straight shaft with a gas sample port at the top and soil-air vent holes at the bottom this probe is pounded into the soil by means of a captive hammer that slides up and down the shaft to either drive the probe into or remove it from the soil (Dyck, 1972 Chemical Projects Limited, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, written common., 1972 Lovell, 1979). Both the hollow auger and hollow hammer-probe are efficient dynamic soil-gas samplers in light soils. Neither sampler works well in stony or hard, compacted soils, or in soils containing layers of caliche attempts to use probes in these soils may either bend the probe or disturb the soil to the extent that the soil-gas sample is diluted by atmospheric air. Soil gas can not be sampled in wet soils with these probes. 

---