Sampling handling before extraction

Internal Standard. The use of internal standard is critical in bioanalytical methods to improve precision and accuracy. The role of internal standard is to mimic the analyte of interest. It should be added before sample preparation/extraction to account for losses and errors introduced during the process. The more sample handling steps there are, the greater the error becomes, because errors are additive. In this case, the use of internal standard minimizes errors significantly. 

Sample handling is a very important part of the method development for HPLC determination of phenolic acids in natural plants. Because of the great variability of phenolic acids (different polarity, acidity, number of hydroxyl groups, and aromatic rings), the various concentration levels of individual analytes, and the very complex natural matrix with many interfering components, the choice of the technique for their isolation and quantification differs from one described HPLC assay to the next. In some cases, only a one-step extraction and simple clean-up procedure are sufficient before the HPLC analysis, but the most often described HPLC assays include two or more steps of sample preparation, especially in the case of fruits and vegetable samples. It is obvious that each step contributes, on one hand, to the higher sensitivity and selectivity, but, on the other hand, it could increase the number of errors and decrease the recovery of the method. 

High costs of instrumentation, maintenance, and consumables may be problematic Tests need to be developed for many relevant analytes Sample pretreatment and analyte extraction often necessary New methodologies for sample handling and processing need to be developed and optimized. This may involve use of solvents, antibody, or other extraction columns Microbial detection often requires use of growth-enrichment media before sufficient numbers are reached to allow accurate detection Some sensor systems are large, complex, and expensive... 

Before analysis, the bacterial cultures should be transferred into standard 20 ml headspace vials and sealed with PTFE-lined Teflon caps to equilibrate the headspace. Sample handling is a critical step affecting the analysis by E-nose. The quality of the analysis can be improved by adopting an appropriate sampling technique. To introduce the volatile compounds present in the headspace (HS) of the sample into the E-nose s detection system, several headspace sampling techniques have been used in E-nose. Typically, the methods of headspace sampling (Ayoko, 2004) include static headspace (SHS) technique, purge and trap (P T) technique, stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) technique, inside-needle dynamic... 

Today, there is strong interest in the development of online sample treatment techniques that allow the handling of untreated biological samples. Thus, in online SPE-LC, deproteination of plasma and serum is required before extraction, especially if the same cartridge is used for repeated analysis. For this purpose, restricted-access materials (RAMs) have been developed, which combine size-exclusion and reversed phase mechanisms, allowing extraction and cleanup of samples in the same step. RAMs have became quite popular for the direct injection of biological fluids, since they prevent the access of matrix components (e.g., proteins) while retaining the analytes in the interior of the sorbent. 

The interlaboratory results obtained from the analysis of defined standard solutions, but also from the analysis of sediment extracts prepared either by the coordinator of the study or by the participants themselves, also provide a measure of the variation between laboratories. The results show that the interlaboratory reproducibility ranges from 6.5% for the defined dioxin sample to 27.9% for the sediment sample extracted by the participants themselves. As was mentioned before, the reproducibility for this last sample is relatively high and most presumably due to the introduction of extra handlings (extraction and cleanup) to the total procedure. In addition, the fact that not all the participants had prior experience with the extraction protocol to be used could have added to the increase in variability of the process. Furthermore, the dilution factor was not dictated. This also introduces a certain degree of variation. For the reproducibility of the DR CALUX bioassay itself and not caused by differences in operating extraction conditions, the maximum variation between laboratories was observed to be 18.0%. The results for the sediment extract samples can also be used to estimate the method variability for extracts, that is, based on samples of unknown composition. Again, given the intra-as well as the interlaboratory variations observed in this study, it appears justified to conclude that the standard deviation of the means provides a reasonable estimate of the method variability, based on the overall aver-... 

Sample preparation includes all techniques that involve handling the sample before detection begins. The intent of sample preparation is to extract efficiently the analytes and isolate them relatively free of interfering matrix components that could obscure the final detection, identification, and quantification process. 

---