Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sample Protein Components

As established earlier in this paper, two carrier ampholytes cannot be separated completely on a pH-gradient unless there is a third one present with intermediate pi However, it is important to state that this is only valid for the carrier ampholytes and not for the sample proteins. Two protein components can be separated completely without the need of a carrier ampholyte having an intermediate pi because the carrier ampholytes show overlapping concentration distributions. This is due to the fact that the protein components are in minor concentration compared to the carrier ampholytes. Thus they have no influence on the course of the pH-gradient. [Pg.21]


Protein Components. The simplest picture of the proteinaceous components is one of polypeptides, which are composed of a-amino acid residues. It is estimated that wool contains about 170 different types of polypeptides varying in molecular mass from below 10,000 to greater than 50,000 (34). Complete acid hydrolysis of wool yields 18 amino acids, the relative amounts of which vary considerably from one wool to another. Typical figures for two different samples of wool are given in Table 7. [Pg.342]

A 2D system coupled with a TOF-MS detector provides not only resolution for a large number of protein components, but also yields accurate intact molecular weight information (e.g., Opiteck et al., 1997 Liu et al., 2002 Millea et al., 2005). Moreover, by splitting the effluent just prior to the MS interface, a small portion can be diverted for MS analysis, whereas the bulk of the sample can be collected for subsequent analysis, following enzymatic digestion, to provide positive identification and characterization of the proteins present in the fraction. [Pg.293]

Nonspecific protein binding to the solid phase complicates the method and is a selective pressure driving its evolution. The adaptive response has been the development of intrinsically comparative methods in which specific binding to an immobilized ligand is blocked in one out of two otherwise identical samples. When the respective protein components of the samples are compared, specifically bound proteins are present in one but severely depleted in the other. To allow relative quantitation, the two samples can be made isotopically distinct by a chemical or metabolic process and then mixed for an analytical step that avoids intersample variability [15]. [Pg.348]

In summary, studies carried out with tissue surrogates25 highlight some of the problems that must be overcome before proteins extracted from FFPE tissues can be used for routine proteomic studies. First, these studies demonstrate that reversal of protein-formaldehyde adducts does not assure quantitative extraction of proteins from FFPE tissues or vice-versa. It may ultimately turn out that there is no one universal method that can accomplish both tasks, but that instead, each step will need to be optimized separately. Studies with tissue surrogates also suggest that failure to quantitatively extract the entire protein component from FFPE tissues may result in sampling bias due to the preferential extraction of certain proteins. This behavior may be linked to protein physical properties, such as the isoelectric point. The results of our... [Pg.246]

According to the predominant component, the binders are usually divided into protein, oil, polysaccharide, and resin binders. In this section we shall focus on protein binders but it is worth mentioning that in the majority of natural non-protein binders a minority protein component is usually present as well. Thus many of the analytical techniques described here can be (with certain limitations) applied to them as well. Although in colour layers of artworks and particularly in paintings protein binders are relatively abundant (up to 10%), their identification is often limited by a small amount of sample that is usually available for analysis (tens or hundreds of micrograms at most [6]). [Pg.168]

The basic theoretical aspects of aerobic and anaerobic processes relevant for wastewater in sewer networks are focused on in Chapters 2 and 3. Figure 5.1 briefly illustrates an important difference between an aerobic and an anaerobic process exemplified with the transformations of protein in a wastewater sample originating from a sewer system. Under aerobic conditions, suspended protein components were significantly increased, and the soluble part was correspondingly reduced. This change is interpreted as the result of a growth process of the bacterial biomass. Under anaerobic conditions, no significant transformations of soluble and particulate protein took place. [Pg.96]

The nature of the sample and the presence of any interfering substances are major considerations in the selection of a suitable method. Fluid samples are the most convenient to handle but some methods are appropriate for the analysis of solid material. The presence of interfering substances may necessitate an initial purification of the protein components. This may be achieved by precipitating the soluble proteins and, after washing, quantitating using a suitable method. The use of heat or strong acids results in irreversible... [Pg.386]

Qy-boronate derivatives have the ability to form covalent bonds with d,v-diol sugars at alkaline pH. Unlike lectins, which typically bind only the terminal sugar in a complex carbohydrate, boronates can bind any physically accessible CM-diol on a glycoprotein.23-25 When hydrophobic boronate derivatives are used, the hydrophobicity of each complexation site is enhanced. To the extent that the protein components of a sample are differentially glycosylated, this can provide a tool for exploiting those differences. [Pg.90]

Study the destained gel or diagram and estimate the number of protein components in each sample. Calculate the relative mobility of each protein band using Equation E4.1. [Pg.275]

Acetonitril is often recommended because of its separating power (cf. Fig. 5). Adding a small amount of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to both gradient components A and B, is state of the art in protein reversed-phase chromatography. It decreases retention time, improves resolution, and increases the recovery of the sample proteins. [Pg.181]

In protein electrophoresis, a sample is applied to a polyacrylamide gel and its protein components are separated by application of an electric field across the gel. Separation is dependent on the charge and size of the proteins in the sample. Different approaches to this method have been developed to suit a variety of purposes. [Pg.157]

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis is conducted utilizing a published procedure [32], Samples of approximately 50 //g of the antibody solution were subjected to electrophoresis. The buffer solution was of pH 8.3 and consisted of 0.005 M Tris and 0.04 M glycine. Electrophoresis was conducted at a constant current of 2.5 ma/gel for periods of 4 to 6 hrs. The finished gels were stained with 0.02% Coomassie Blue G-250 to reveal the protein components. The results for immune serum and the purified antiglucose antibodies were photographed, Fig. (8A). The non-antibody protein components in the serum have been removed by the affinity method. [Pg.530]

The Use of Nonproteolytic Enzymes Prior to Se Speciation It goes without saying that food samples contain components other than proteins. This fact can be related to the observation that some sample preparation attempts based on the sole use of proteolytic enzymes have failed, for example, protease XIV could not extract more than 8 percent of Se from Se-enriched lactic acid bacteria with a chromatographic recovery of 27 percent [77]. There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon (1) formerly unidentified and nonprotein-bound Se species might be present in the samples under test, which cannot be released by proteolytic enzymes from the matrix constituents under the experimental conditions adopted (2) the unextracted Se species are protein-bound, but the proteolytic attack is hampered by a matrix constituent, hindering any enzymatic access. [Pg.615]

Permselectivity — According to IUPAC A term used to define the preferential permeation of certain ionic species through - ion-exchange membranes. (See also surface-modified electrodes). Discrimination is based on the size or ion charge of the ionic species studied. Permselectivity prevents electrode surface fouling by sample matrix components, e.g., by proteins in biological fluids. [Pg.490]

A different binding medium was identified in MS 965 (Rockefel-ler-McCormick New Testament), however. Figure 5 shows the spectrum obtained from a sample of the manuscript s sizing material. Although the spectrum is clearly not that of egg yolk, it has the features of a predominantly protein component. The protein-containing binders used in that period are presumed to include casein, egg white, and hide glue (25). The spectrum closely matches that of hide glue (26). [Pg.269]

In order to obtain information about the polarographic properties of the individual protein components in blood sera, the polarography was combined with paper electrophoresis. After electrophoretic separation, the cut strips of paper with separated fractions of albumins and globulins are eluted in physiological sodium chloride solution and each sample is analyzed polarographically. These combined methods were applied for study of various pathological cases [147]. [Pg.268]

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of RNA has been used for two purposes. One general problem has been to identify RNA species migrating in the form of nucleoprotein particles, e.g. ribosomes and viruses. In this case, the buffer used in the second dimension is one in which the RNA and protein components are dissociated. RNA species of known size can be run in parallel with the sample in the second dimension. [Pg.330]

Two Dimensional-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) is the most powerful tool to separate the different components of complex protein mixtures. Proteins are first separated according to their p.I. in IEF (first dimension), then a further orthogonal separation according to the MW is performed by SDS-PAGE (second dimension). In this way all the protein components of a biological sample can be virtually separated. [Pg.265]

Proteome samples often have very large ranges in protein concentration. Dominant, high-abundance proteins can compromise the analysis of minor protein components. For instance, plasma is composed of a complex mixture of proteins and albumin and immunoglobulin G compose over 60% of the total protein amount in plasma (132). These abundant proteins can make the analysis of medium- to low-abundance proteins very difficult (133,134). [Pg.123]


See other pages where Sample Protein Components is mentioned: [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.699]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.1291]    [Pg.128]   


SEARCH



Protein, proteins sampling

Proteins samples

Sample component

© 2024 chempedia.info