Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Sample preparation separation methods

LOC systems can also be variously classified based on sample preparation/separation methods (e.g., gelfilteratimi, chromatography), detection methods used (e.g., MS, optical systems, immuno-detection), and appUcatimi (research vs. diagnostics, multiuse vs. single use). [Pg.1563]

Several methods are available for the analysis of trichloroethylene in biological media. The method of choice depends on the nature of the sample matrix cost of analysis required precision, accuracy, and detection limit and turnaround time of the method. The main analytical method used to analyze for the presence of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroethanol and TCA, in biological samples is separation by gas chromatography (GC) combined with detection by mass spectrometry (MS) or electron capture detection (ECD). Trichloroethylene and/or its metabolites have been detected in exhaled air, blood, urine, breast milk, and tissues. Details on sample preparation, analytical method, and sensitivity and accuracy of selected methods are provided in Table 6-1. [Pg.229]

Cornelis R, De Kimpe J, and Zhang X (1998) Trace elements in clinical samples revisited -speciation is knocking at the door. Sample preparation, separation of the spedes and measurement methods. Spectrochim Acta 536 187-196. [Pg.102]

Compound Matrix/ application Sample preparation Separation mode Detection method Comments Reference... [Pg.116]

The purpose of this section is to provide a review of HPLC methods available for the determination of synthetic colors in foods, including sample preparation, separation techniques, and detection systems. [Pg.554]

By the late 1990s and into the 2000s, a number of additional groups became involved in automated fluidic separations for radiochemical analysis, especially as a front end for ICP-MS. Published journal articles on fluidic separations for radio-metric or mass spectrometric detection are summarized in Tables 9.1 through 9.5. The majority of such studies have used extraction chromatographic separations, and these will be the main focus of the remainder of this chapter. Section 9.4 describes methods that combine separation and detection. Section 9.5 describes a fully automated system that combines sample preparation, separation, and detection. [Pg.524]

Process monitoring poses two additional challenges compared to these automated fluidic separation methods. First, methodology for automated sample preparation must be developed, and second, the entire sample preparation-separation-detection system must be developed to operate on-line or at-site under unattended computer control, including sample transport through all the steps. Sample preparation is particularly critical for nuclear-waste and nuclear-process streams due to the complexity of the sample matrix and the uncontrolled valence states of several of the potential analytes. [Pg.549]

The total time for analysis—including sample preparation, separation, and detection—was 12.5 minutes for one sample, or 22 minutes for the sample and spiked sample. In tests on actual Hanford nuclear-waste samples, comparing results from the automated analyzer method to laboratory ICP-MS determinations, the analyzer method proved to be accurate in the determination of total "Tc. [Pg.551]

Methods for the analysis of organic and organometallic compounds are discussed in this chapter. It has become evident that for the analysis of these two classes of compounds, the analyst can draw on a very similar repertoire of analytical techniques with respect to sample preparation, separation, and detection. Chromatographic and, in particular, hyphenated techniques are the workhorses of environmental water analysis. The various formats and technical realizations of mass spectrometers are the most versatile detectors. Their sensitivity and ability to provide structural information at the low and even sub-pg level are an asset and at the same time a prerequisite for (ultra)trace analysis in the aquatic environment. As further significant improvements in detector sensitivity are unlikely, the probable focus of attention in the future will again be on sample preparation. Here, the introduction of new approaches, techniques, and materials for sample preparation can be expected to make a significant impact in this field. [Pg.342]

An introduction to the current techniques and methods of analytical and preparative biochemistry. In addition to the core methodologies of sample preparation, separation and analysis, the authors discuss the application of immunological and biophysical approaches to the study of biochemical systems, as well as advising on biochemical literature, equipment and safety aspects of laboratory work. [Pg.361]

The present study focuses on the structure of PDMS layers on the surface of fumed silicas. Two different methods were used for sample preparation. One method was based on the adsorption of PDMS from a PDMS solution onto the silica surface followed by a thermal treatment. The other method was based on mechanical mixing of PDMS with silica followed by the separation of bound... [Pg.716]

The main domain of fluorescence labelling was and still is in amino acid an ilyses, where the greatest progress has been made by introduction of new reagents and, especially, by improvement of the separation methods. Several fully automated procedures of sample preparation, separation and quantitative evaluation are now at our disposal, routinely allowing the determination of pmol and even fmol quantities of the commoner amino acids. Related methods for the determination of aliphatic amines, thiols, keto acids and sugars have also been improved. [Pg.204]

The results obtained by TLC-spectrophotometry have been compared with those obtained by atomic absorption spectrometry using a sample prepared separately or scraped off from the separate TLC plate. Other techniques (55,143,164,186,191) have also been suggested to confirm the TLC results before recommending the method for analysis of real samples. [Pg.523]

This chapter is divided into the three major processes required for the analysis of THC and its major metabolites sample preparation separation and detection. The authors present their own methods in detail and outline contributions from other researchers (summarized in Table 1) to broaden the scope of the chapter. [Pg.76]

LC is not only a powerful analytical method as such, but it also allows effective sample preparation for GC. The fractions of interest (heart-cuts) are collected and introduced into the GC. The GC column can then be used to separate the fractions of different polarity on the basis of volatility differences. The separation efficiency and selectivity of LC is needed to isolate the compounds of interest from a complex matrix. [Pg.273]

Although on-line sample preparation cannot be regarded as being traditional multidimensional chromatography, the principles of the latter have been employed in the development of many on-line sample preparation techniques, including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC, SPME, thermal desorption and other on-line extraction methods. As with multidimensional chromatography, the principle is to obtain a portion of the required selectivity by using an additional separation device prior to the main analytical column. [Pg.427]


See other pages where Sample preparation separation methods is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.3428]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.1355]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.3294]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.410]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.427]   


SEARCH



Preparative separation

Sample methods

Sample preparation method

Sample separation

Sampling methods

Separation methods

Separative methods

Separator preparation

Separators preparative

© 2024 chempedia.info