Risk tolerability matrix

During 1999, the European Commission ARIBA project attempted to build an accident risk tolerability matrix for air traffic operations on UK Health and Safety Executive lines. The main reason for this was due to the fact that UK industry safety assessments usually use the HSE studies and guidelines about tolerable and acceptable risk , with the following (simplified) HSE definitions ... 

Table B.12 Possible aviation accident risk tolerability matrix ...

The purpose of a risk management matrix is to (a) provide a logical framework for hazard analysis and risk assessment and (b) assist risk decision makers in arriving at their risk reduction and risk acceptance or declination conclusions. The implicit goal is to achieve acceptable risk levels. Several standards and guidelines now include the concepts of residual risk and acceptable or tolerable risk (e.g., ANSl/Bll TR3, ISO/IEC Guide 51, SEMI SIO—see references for full titles). 

To emphasize Safety professionals must understand that the definitions of terms for incident probability and severity and for risk levels vary greatly. Thus, they should tailor a risk assessment matrix to suit the hazards and risks and the management tolerance for risk with which they deal. Examples of the definitions used for incident probability and severity are presented here, as well as definitions for risk categories and risk assessment matrices. They are intended to provide safety professionals with a broad base of information from which choices can be made in developing the matrix considered appropriate for their clients needs. 

In the discussion that follows of acceptable and tolerable risk levels and the management actions to be taken to achieve them, the Example of a Risk Assessment Matrix given in Table 11 serves as the foundation. Keep in mind that ... 

Definition of hazard, risk discussions on likelihood, consequence risk — register, matrix, ranking. Consequence ranking, preliminary hazard analysis tolerance point—ALARP refreshing on mathematics, fault tolerance, plant ageing, and basic functional safety fail safe operations in plants. 

The calculated value of f is then compared with a target frequency. The target frequency may be derived from detailed risk tolerance criteria, or may take the form of a risk matrix. This comparison allows decisions to be made on whether further risk reduction is required and what performance any further risk reduction needs to achieve, including the SIL, if the additional protection layer is a SIS. 

Provides an Overview of Risk Tolerance as Related to Identified Hazard and Associated Risk. Source Risk Management System Guidance Pack, The Residual Risk Matrix, 2011 System Safety Process... 

Many companies utilize a risk matrix or table that assigns nruneric measimes to risk based on probability and severity the ratings are used to prioritize safety efforts. A sample risk matrix is provided below. Note The risk matrix you use shoidd be tailored to suit yoru- organization s risk tolerance and should take into account the specific operations, hazards, and available controls. 

In contrast to reservoir patches, there is no risk of dosedumping a with matrix patch, which releases buprenorphine from a prolonged-release matrix in direct contact with the skin for at least 3 days. The improved solubility necessary to achieve an adequate concentration of dissolved buprenorphine base is obtained by means of well tolerated organic acids that do not form practically insoluble salts with buprenorphine in the undercooled mass in the matrix of the TTS. In Europe transdermal buprenorphine was developed by Grunenthal as Transtec , which was launched in Germany in 2001 and recently approved in major Europoean markets with dosages of 35, 52.5 and 70 pg/h containing 20, 30 and 40 mg buprenorphine per TDS respectively (Fig. 10 Terlinden et al., 2000). 

Any of the above strategies will have an impact on test planning, as they aU are intended to reduce unacceptable risk to a tolerable level. Regulators have consistently demonstrated that they believe that there needs to be demonstrable evidence that everything that should have been tested has been, and that the depth of testing needs to be justified. The traceability matrix provides the former, and a sound risk assessment practice satisfies the latter. 

The constancy of the nebulizer gas flow is of prime importance for the precision achievable in ICP-MS. After stabilizing the nebulizer gas flows, relative standard deviations can be below 1%. They can be improved still further by internal standardization [509]. The tolerable salt concentrations (1-5 g/L) are much lower than in ICP-AES, because of the risks of sampler clogging and depend on the respective salts. The memory effects may become limiting and in the case of a high matrix load rinsing times of 1-2 min are required. 

Many standards, including lEC 61S08, suggest the familiar risk matrix approach, such as in Table 1, for deciding whether risks are tolerable or not. The Roman numerals I to IV represent risk classes, where risk class I is intolerable and IV is acceptable. Although lEC 61508 is clear that this is an example only, we have observed many projects which have attempted to apply this matrix directly without question. 

This approach pre-supposes that it is possible to determine independently for each hazard whether the risk is tolerable or not. This may be applicable when the safety target is ALARP, but not so when it is GALE. The risk matrix approach also overlooks the issue that, if there are many hazards that fall into a particular risk class, this should be regarded as less tolerable than if there is only a single hazard in that class. 

Tolerable and non-tolerable ranges are clearly defined prior to developing risk matrix. 

I PPG HI Version 6 July 2003. Ttie tolerability criteria from this reference is summarised in matrix form in Table 9 below. Further guidance on environmental risk matrix can be found in Annex 5 of HSE s SPC/Permissioning/11... 

SR/15 describes both quantitative and risk matrix approaches to establishing target SILs but a very strong preference for the quantitative approach is stressed. It addresses the setting of maximum tolerable risk targets (fatality rates). The tolerable risk targets were shown in Chapter 2 of this book. 

It is widely accepted that the acquisition of, at least, two SRM transitions in tandem MS, together with the retention time and the measurement of the ion intensity ratio, gives sufficient information for a safe confirmation of potential positives in samples. Typically, the most-sensitive transition is used for quantification and the other one for confirmation. However, the specificity of the transitions has to be considered as well, as it plays an important role in the confirmation process. In this sense, it is important to avoid the use of nonspecific transitions (due to common losses such as H2O, CO2, and HCl) to improve the confirmation [16]. Reporting false positives is unlikely, although possible however, more risks exist of false negatives when one of the transitions is shared by a matrix and interference, as the ion ratio might be out of tolerance. 

The resultant risk matrix can be used to provide and develop an action plan which may also be assigned numbers so that priorities can be identified. Risk matrices are often colour coded to provide a visual concept of whether or not the residual risk is tolerable or acceptable. 

Unless a TD is designed, built and cared-after like a hydrodam, which means at perpetuity high level monitoring and care (TD cannot be breached, unlike hydro dams) its probability will raise very significantly. No residents should be allowed downstream of the said stracture, within reach of possible mn-out from a breach, to ensure ANCOLD compliance. Risk assessments have to be sophisticated enough to allow pf estimates compatible with the ANCOLD tolerability thresholds. Standard practice matrix-based risk assessments Oboni et al. (2013), (Oboni and Oboni 2013)... 

The combination of the hazard severity and the hazard probability defines the hazard risk classes. These classes are listed in Table 4 with different levels of tolerability Class A forms the intolerable area of the risk matrix, Class B and C the tolerable area and class D means acceptable risk. 

---