Risk assessment responsibility

The DG SANCO system of Scientific Committees established in 1997 included a Scientific Steering Committee and eight specific committees. Risk assessment responsibilities, previously carried out by the Steering Committee and the five scientific committees in the field of food and feed... 

The different models show bias. Concentration addition implies that effects always increase with each additional compound (even when present at extremely low concentrations), and there is clear evidence that this occurs with similarly acting compounds, but it is not yet clarified with dissimilarly acting compounds (see reviews, above). Thus, applying concentration addition to mixtures of dissimilarly acting compounds might overestimate effects and risks, and this may be an undesired feature for various risk assessments (e.g., for retrospective, diagnostic risk assessments). Response addition implies that mixture effects only occur when at least 1 compound induces toxic effects. However, as cited in the review of data (Section 5.3.1), mixtures with... 

Even more significantly, risk assessment responsibilities have been devolved to the private sector. Registration of chemicals produced or imported in quantities of at least 10 t per manufacturer and per year (pm/py) must be accompanied by a Chemical Safety Report (CSR), which is a renamed but other otherwise largely unchanged risk assessment as formerly required from NRAs under Directives 67/548/EEC20 and 93/67/EEC.21... 

Fire Precautions drills, maintenance of exit routes, regular maintenance. Hazards risk assessments/responsibilities and procedures (see Chapter 3 for further details). 

In consumer product and component product applications, the manufacturer is responsible for conducting the risk assessment, if applicable. Product users typically have no risk assessment responsibilities beyond using the product in conformance with the product information. 

The final article, by S. G. Bell and G. A. Codd of the University of Dundee Department of Biological Services, is concerned with detection, analysis, and risk assessment of cyanobacterial toxins. These can be responsible for animal, fish, and bird deaths and for ill-health in humans. The occurrence of toxic cyanobacterial blooms and scums on nutrient-rich waters is a world-wide phenomenon and cases are cited from Australia, the USA, and China, as well as throughout Europe. The causes, indentification and assessment of risk, and establishment of criteria for controlling risk are discussed. 

Arguably, risk assessment from exposure to carcinogens merits special consideration because of the low levels of exposure capable of producing an adverse response in certain individuals coupled with the often long time-lag (latency period) between exposure and onset of disease. 

Generally, risk assessment has focused on the first type of error, since the main interest in human reliability was in the context of human actions that were required as part of an emergency response. However, a comprehensive Consequence Analysis has to also consider other types, since both of these outcomes could constitute sources of risk to the individual or the plant. 

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

The term risk assessment is not only used to describe the likelihood of an ad crse response to a chemical or physical agent, but it has also been used to describe the likelihood of any unwanted event. This subject is treated in more detail in tlie next Part. These include risks such as explosions or injuries in tlie workplace natural catastrophes injury or deatli due to various voluntary activities such as skiing, sky diving, flying, and bimgee Jumping diseases deatli due to natural causes and many others. ... 

Generally, the slope factor is a plausible upper bound estimate of the probability of a response per unit intake of a ehemieal over a lifetime. The slope factor is used in risk assessments to estimate an upper-bound lifetime probability of an individual developing cancer as a result of e.xposure to a particular level of a potential carcinogen. Slope factors should always be accompanied by the weight-of-evidence classification to indicate the strength of the evidence that the agent is a human carcinogen. Calculational details are presented below. 

Altliough the technical conununity has come a long way in understanding how to do a better job in luizard identification, dose-response assessment, and exposure assessment portions of risk assessment, it lias only begun to understand how to best cluiractcrize hcaltli risks and how to present tliese risks most appropriately to both the public and decision makers. Tlie next tliree sections specifically address tlicse issues. Tliis section deals witli qualitative risk assessment while tlie next two sections deal witli quantitative risk assessment. 

Uncertainty on tlie other hand, represents lack of knowledge about factors such as adverse effects or contaminant levels which may be reduced with additional study. Generally, risk assessments carry several categories of uncertainly, and each merits consideration. Measurement micertainty refers to tlie usual eiTor tliat accompanies scientific measurements—standard statistical teclmiques can often be used to express measurement micertainty. A substantial aniomit of uncertainty is often inlierent in enviromiiental sampling, and assessments should address tliese micertainties. There are likewise uncertainties associated with tlie use of scientific models, e.g., dose-response models, and models of environmental fate and transport. Evaluation of model uncertainty would consider tlie scientific basis for the model and available empirical validation. 

The risk assessment steps and the risk characterization are influenced by uncertainty and variability. Variability arise from heterogeneity such as dose-response differences within a population, or differences in contaminant levels in tlie environment. Uncertainty on tlie other lumd, represents lack of knowledge about factors such as adverse effects or contaminant levels. 

This book is divided into five parts the problem, accidents, health risk, hazard risk, and hazard risk analysis. Part 1, an introduction to HS AM, presents legal considerations, emergency planning, and emergency response. This Part basically ser es as an oveiwiew to the more teclmical topics covered in the remainder of the book. Part 11 treats the broad subject of accidents, discussing fires, explosions and other accidents. The chapters in Parts 111 and Part IV provide introductory material to health and hazard risk assessment, respectively. Pai1 V examines hazaid risk analysis in significant detail. The thiee chapters in this final part include material on fundamentals of applicable statistics theory, and the applications and calculations of risk analysis for real systems. 

A biomarker is here defined as a biological response to an environmental chemical at the individual level or below, which demonstrates a departure from normality. Responses at higher levels of biological organization are not, according to this definition, termed biomarkers. Where such biological responses can be readily measnred, they may provide the basis for biomarker assays, which can be nsed to stndy the effects of chemicals in the laboratory or, most importantly, in the field. There is also interest in their employment as tools for the environmental risk assessment of chemicals. 

Thns far, the discussion has dealt primarily with biomarker responses in living organisms. In the next section, consideration will be given to the exploitation of this principle in the development of bioassay systems that can be nsed in environmental monitoring and environmental risk assessment. 

Apart from the use of this approach to study the ecotoxicology of neurotoxic pollutants in the field, it also has potential for use during the course of environmental risk assessment. An understanding of the relationship between biomarker responses to neurotoxic compounds and effects at the population level can be gained from both field studies and the use of mesocosms and other model systems. From these it may be possible to define critical thresholds in biomarker responses of indicator species above which population effects begin to appear. In the longer term, this approach... 

Dose-response assessment is the process of obtaining quantitative information about the probability of human illness following exposure to a hazard it is the translation of exposure into harm. Dose-response curves have been determined for some hazards. The curves show the relationship of dose exposure and the probabihty of a response. Since vahdated dose-response relationships are scarce, various other inputs are used to underpin the hazard characterization phase of risk assessment. 

---