Rheology Maxwell model

The rheological constitutive equation of the Rouse model is that of an upper-convected Maxwell model, with the consequence that steady-state elongational flow only exists for strain rates lower than l/(2A,i). The steady-state elongational wscosity depends then on strain rate ... 

Figure 5.18 Storage and loss moduli for a 7% w/v HEUR associative thickener M — 33,100 Mu) Mn 1.47) end-capped with hexadecanol at 25°C. The lines are a fit to a one-mode Maxwell model. (From Annable et al. 1993, with permission from the Journal of Rheology.)...

In fact, Equation 5.281 describes an interface as a two-dimensional Newtonian fluid. On the other hand, a number of non-Newtonian interfacial rheological models have been described in the literature. Tambe and Sharma modeled the hydrodynamics of thin liquid films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces, which obey a generalized Maxwell model for the interfacial stress tensor. These authors also presented a constitutive equation to describe the rheological properties of fluid interfaces containing colloidal particles. A new constitutive equation for the total stress was proposed by Horozov et al. ° and Danov et al. who applied a local approach to the interfacial dilatation of adsorption layers. 

The rheological consequences of the Maxwell model are apparent in stress relaxation phenomena. In an ideal solid, the stress required to maintain a constant deformation is constant and does not alter as a function of time. However, in a Maxwellian body, the stress required to maintain a constant deformation decreases (relaxes) as a function of time. The relaxation process is due to the mobility of the dashpot, which in turn releases the stress on the spring. Using dynamic oscillatory methods, the rheological behavior of many pharmaceutical and biological systems may be conveniently described by the Maxwell model (for example, Reference 7, Reference 17, References 20 to 22). In practice, the rheological behavior of materials of pharmaceutical and biomedical significance is more appropriately described by not one, but a finite or infinite number of Maxwell elements. Therefore, associated with these are either discrete or continuous spectra of relaxation times, respectively (15,18). 

Equation (6.52) has the exact form of a convected Maxwell model. Therefore, many results from continuum mechanics can be applied to Eq. (6.52) directly. The relevant aspects of continuum mechanics are discussed in Appendix 6.A. The rheological tensors in Eq. (6.52) are all evaluated by following a particular fluid particle at any current moment t. Since a particular fluid point is followed, t may be replaced by a past time t. ... 

The rheological behavior of a viscoelastic material can be investigated by applying a small-amplitude sinusoidal deformation. The behavior can be described by a mechanical model, called the Maxwell model [33], consisting of an elastic spring with the Hookean constant, G , and a dashpot with the viscosity, r/<,. The variation of storage modulus (G ) and loss modulus (G") with shear frequency, O), are given by the equations... 

The striking difference lies in the mounting, in series for the Maxwell model and in parallel for the equivalent electric circuit. However, this is purely a question of convention. In electricity, and therefore in an equivalent circuit, the current flows through the components and the potential difference develops between their ends. In rheology, it is the opposite, stress circulates through the components and the shear rate develops across them. 

The relaxation period defines the behavior of the system, in accordance with the Maxwell model with respect to the timescale of the applied stress. If the time t during which stress is applied is greater than the relaxation period, that is, t > t the system has properties similar to those of a viscous liquid, while at t t the system behaves like an elastic solid. The flow of glaciers and other processes of strain development in mountains and cliffs are representative examples of such behavior. In rheology, the ratio of a material s characteristic relaxation time to the characteristic flow time is referred to as the Deborah number. This parameter plays an important role in describing the response of various materials to different stresses. 

For polyacrylamide there are two rheological effects which can be explained in terms of its random coil structure. Firstly, it was discussed above that polyacrylamide is much more sensitive than xanthan to solution salinity and hardness. This is explained by the fact that the salinity causes the molecular chain to collapse, which results in a much smaller molecule and hence in a lower viscosity solution. The second effect which can be explained in terms of the polyacrylamide random coil structure is the viscoelastic behaviour of this polymer. This is shown both in the dynamic oscillatory measurements and in the flow through the stepped capillaries (Chauveteau, 1981). When simple models of random chains are constructed, such as the Rouse model (Rouse, 1953 Bird et al, 1987), the internal structure of these bead and spring models gives rise to a spectrum of relaxation times, Analysis of this situation shows that these relaxation times define response times for the molecule, as indicated in the simple Maxwell model for a viscoelastic fluid discussed above. Thus, because of the internal structure of a flexible coil molecule, one would expect to observe some viscoelastic behaviour. This phenomenon is discussed in much more detail by Bird et al (1987b), in which a range of possible molecular models are discussed and the significance of these to the constitutive relationship between stress and deformation rate and deformation history is elaborated. 

The Maxwell model can also be used in order to characterize the dynamic properties of viscoelastic surfactant solutions. The simplicity of comparing rheological data with the theoretical predictions of a Maxwell material is rather attractive. In this way, it is easy to interpret viscoelastic flow processes. 

This is the constitutive equation or rheological equation of state for the elastic dumbbell suspensions. It is identical to the upper-convected Maxwell model, eq. 4.3.7. The molecular dynamics have led to a proper (frame-indifferent) time derivative and to a definition... 

The rheological predictions that derive from this simple molecular model are very similar to the upper-convected Maxwell model see example 4.3.3. Recall that t = Tj + tp = r , 2D + Xp. We obtain Steady shear viscosity... 

There have been numerous studies on the film-blowing process. Since the initial thin-shell approximation proposed by Pearson and Petrie [125, 126] with the Newtonian model assumed for deformation, various rheological models have been incorporated in simulations, such as the power-law model [127,128], a crystallization model [129], the Maxwell model [130-133], the Leonov model [133], a viscoplasti-c-elastic model [134], the K-BKZ/PSM model [135-137], and a nonisothermal viscosity model [138]. A complete set of experimental data was reported by Gupta [139] for the Styron 666 polystyrene and by Tas [140] for three different grades of LDPE. 

Time response of different rheological systems to applied forces. The Maxwell model gives steady creep with some post stress recovery, representative of a polymer with no cross-linking. The Kelvin-Voigt model gives a retarded viscoelastic behavior expected from a cross-linked polymer. 

Physics-Based Ground-Motion Simulation, Fig. 5 Examples of rheological models used to incorporate the effect of attenuation, (a) Generalized Maxwell model (Emmerich and Kom 1987), (b) generalized... 

It is seen that the material functions obtained from the covariant convected derivative of a are different from those obtained from the contravariant convected derivative of a. Experimental results reported to date indicate that the magnitude of N2 is much smaller than that of (say -A 2/ i 0.2-0.3). Therefore, the rheology community uses only the contravariant convected derivative of a when using Eq. (3.4), which is referred to as the upper convected Maxwell model. However, the limitations of the upper convected Maxwell model lie in that, as shown in Eq. (3.6), (1) it predicts shear-rate independent viscosity (i.e., Newtonian viscosity, t]q), (2) is proportional to over the entire range of shear rate, and (3) N2 = 0. There is experimental evidence (Baek et al. 1993 Christiansen and Miller 1971 Ginn and Metzner 1969 Olabisi and Williams 1972) that suggests Nj is negative. Also, as will be shown later in this chapter, and also in Chapter 5, in steady-state shear flow for many polymeric liquids, (1) l (k) follows Newtonian behavior at low y and then decreases as y increases above a certain critical value, and (2) increases with at low y and then increases with y (l < n < 2) as y increases further above a certain critical value. 

---