Viscoelastic interfaces

D. E. Tambe and M. M. Sharma, Hydrodynamics of thin liquid-films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 147, 137-151 (1991) Factors controlling the stability of colloid-stabilized emulsions. 1. An experimental investigation, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 157, 244-253 (1993) Factors controlling the stability of colloid-stabilized emulsions. 2. A model for the rheological properties of colloid-laden interfaces, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 162, 1-10 (1994) Factors controlling the stability of colloid-stabilized emulsions. 3. Measurement of the rheological properties of colloid-laden interfaces, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 171, 456-462 (1995). 

Whittier, J. S. The Effects of Configurational Additions Using Viscoelastic Interfaces on the Damping of a Cantilever Beam WADC TR 58-568, ASTIA Doc. 214381, 1959. 

In fact, Equation 5.281 describes an interface as a two-dimensional Newtonian fluid. On the other hand, a number of non-Newtonian interfacial rheological models have been described in the literature. Tambe and Sharma modeled the hydrodynamics of thin liquid films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces, which obey a generalized Maxwell model for the interfacial stress tensor. These authors also presented a constitutive equation to describe the rheological properties of fluid interfaces containing colloidal particles. A new constitutive equation for the total stress was proposed by Horozov et al. ° and Danov et al. who applied a local approach to the interfacial dilatation of adsorption layers. 

The classical form of describing relaxations, as mention above, was founded by Maxwell (1868). Following Moelwyn-Hughes (1971) the relaxation time x is connected with the displacement of a particle by a simple equation. It is interesting, that surface rheological properties can be studied by the displacement of hydrophobic particles at viscoelastic interfaces (Maru Wasan 1979), using an equation like... 

The oscillatory deep-channel rheometer described by Nagarajan and Wasan (227) can be used to examine the rheological behavior of liquid/liquid interfaces. The method is based on monitoring the motion of tracer particles at an interface contained in a channel formed by two concentric rings, which is subjected to a well-defined flow field. The middle liquid/liquid interface and upper gas/liquid interface are both plane horizon tal layers sandwiched between the adjacent bulk phase. The walls are stationary while the base moves. In the instrument described for dynamic studies of viscoelastic interfaces the base oscillates sinusoidally. This move ment induces shear stresses in the bottom liquid that are transmitted to the interface. The interfaces are viewed from above through a microscope attached to a rotary micrometer stage which is coaxial to the cylinders. 

The breakup of confined droplets was studied systematically for systems with either interfacial or component viscoelasticity. Keiit of Newtonian and compatibilized droplets showed a similar increase with increasing confinement ratio. However, a decrease in breakup Icaigth was observed in the compatibilized case, caused by the viscoelastic interface. Viscoelastic Cardinaels et al. 2011... 

DE Tambe, MM Sharma. Hydrodynamics of thin liquid films bounded by viscoelastic interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 147 137-151, 1991. 

Viscoelastic polymers essentially dominate the multi-billion dollar adhesives market, therefore an understanding of their adhesion behavior is very important. Adhesion of these materials involves quite a few chemical and physical phenomena. As with elastic materials, the chemical interactions and affinities in the interface provide the fundamental link for transmission of stress between the contacting bodies. This intrinsic resistance to detachment is usually augmented several folds by dissipation processes available to the viscoelastic media. The dissipation processes can have either a thermodynamic origin such as recoiling of the stretched polymeric chains upon detachment, or a dynamic and rate-sensitive nature as in chain pull-out, chain disentanglement and deformation-related rheological losses in the bulk of materials and in the vicinity of interface. 

Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation.

Elastic vs. viscoelastic w hen = 0, no visco-plastic deformation occurs, Eq. 4.25 gives the intrinsic strength of the interface. 

True vs. apparent strength the visco-plastic energy dissipation dominated the magnitude of the peel strength. However, little dissipation occurs if the interface becomes very weak. In other words, some influxes are necessary to produce sufficient stress to activate the viscoelastic deformation in the body of the A. 

The energy release rate (G) represents adherence and is attributed to a multiplicative combination of interfacial and bulk effects. The interface contributions to the overall adherence are captured by the adhesion energy (Go), which is assumed to be rate-independent and equal to the thermodynamic work of adhesion (IVa)-Additional dissipation occurring within the elastomer is contained in the bulk viscoelastic loss function 0, which is dependent on the crack growth velocity (v) and on temperature (T). The function 0 is therefore substrate surface independent, but test geometry dependent. 

The treatment of blends as a two phase system opened up an interesting field of modifying the composite properties by the use of a (third component within the interface boundaries, which is termed as compatibilizers [1]. Such modifications are still being extended to the formation of microgel out of the interaction between the two blend partners having a reactive for functionalities. This type of interchain crosslinking does not require any compatibilizer to enhance the blend properties and also allows the blends to be reprocessed by further addition of a curative to achieve still further improved properties [3,4]. Such interchain crosslinking is believed to reduce the viscoelastic mismatch between the blend partners and, thus, facilitates smooth extrusion [5,6]. 

---