Revision level

The above must be explicit, clear, accurate, and to the current revision level. 

Operating system problems with each new revision level... 

Understand how to utilize the manufacturer s revision level tracking and establish a procedure to track software modifications through management of change. 

The embedded software revision level is the same as the revision level analyzed when initially approving the PES for use as an SIS. 

Almost since its introduction the effectiveness of the air bag has been questioned, let alone its cost-effectiveness. Kent et al. (2005) wrote an extensive review of the various evaluations that were conducted on different versions in its evolution. Early projections were that it alone (without belts) would reduce fatalities in frontal impacts by as much as 57 percent, but as data accumulated the estimates were revised downward to 22-29 percent for frontal collisions and 12-14 percent in all crashes (Kent et ah, 2005). With respect to injury reduction, the benefits are less clear-cut and some, on the basis of analyses of U.S. crash data (Evans, 2004 McGwin et al, 2003) question their effectiveness at all. Finally, However, Thompson et al. (2002), using the revised levels of effectiveness concluded that not only does it save lives and reduce injuries, but in terms of cost/beneflt ratio, the air bag is a reasonable investment in safety . 

Documentation requirements (e.g., frequency of demands placed on SIF/SIS, procedures/methods/techniques, proof tests and inspections, test results, equipment identifiers down to the revision level, responsible persons/departments/organizations)... 

While simulations reach into larger time spans, the inaccuracies of force fields become more apparent on the one hand properties based on free energies, which were never used for parametrization, are computed more accurately and discrepancies show up on the other hand longer simulations, particularly of proteins, show more subtle discrepancies that only appear after nanoseconds. Thus force fields are under constant revision as far as their parameters are concerned, and this process will continue. Unfortunately the form of the potentials is hardly considered and the refinement leads to an increasing number of distinct atom types with a proliferating number of parameters and a severe detoriation of transferability. The increased use of quantum mechanics to derive potentials will not really improve this situation ab initio quantum mechanics is not reliable enough on the level of kT, and on-the-fly use of quantum methods to derive forces, as in the Car-Parrinello method, is not likely to be applicable to very large systems in the foreseeable future. 

The pubHcations detailing standards (5—8) generally include both specifications and methods of analysis for the substances. The estabHshment of standards of quaHty for chemicals of any kind presupposes the abiHty to set numerical limits on physical properties, allowable impurities, and strength, and to provide the test methods by which conformity to the requirements may be demonstrated. Tests are considered appHcable only to the specific requirements for which they were written. Modification of a requirement, especially if the change is toward a higher level of purity, often necessitates revision of the test to ensure the test s vaHdity. 

The ASA (now ANSI) performance code for Safety Glazing Materials was revised in 1966 to incorporate these improvements in windshield constmction. The addition of test no. 26 requiring support of a 2.3-kg ball dropped from 3.7 m defined this level of improvement. It was based on a correlation estabUshed between 10-kg, instmmented, head-form impacts on windshields, on 0.6 x 0.9-m flat laminates, and the standard 0.3 x 0.3-m laminate with the 2.3-kg ball (28). Crash cases involving the two windshield interlayer types were matched for car impact speeds and were compared (29). The improved design produced fewer, less extensive, and less severe facial lacerations than those produced in the pre-1966 models. 

Confirmation of the destmetion of ozone by chlorine and bromine from halofluorocarbons has led to international efforts to reduce emissions of ozone-destroying CPCs and Halons into the atmosphere. The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer (150) (and its 1990 and 1992 revisions) calls for an end to the production of Halons in 1994 and CPCs, carbon tetrachloride, and methylchloroform byjanuary 1, 1996. In 1993, worldwide production of CPCs was reduced to 50% of 1986 levels of 1.13 x 10 and decreases in growth rates of CPC-11 and CPC-12 have been observed (151). 

Effective Dec. 10, 1987, the existing standard for benzene was amended under OSHA (29 CER, Part 1910.1028). The revised standard reduced the permissible exposure limit from 10 ppm (32 mg/m ) to 1 ppm (3.2 mg/m ) iu an 8-h TWA. The short term exposure limit (STEL) of 5 ppm was set over a 15 min period. The standard also established action level requirements for exposure over 0.5 ppm. 

Control of NO under the CAAA of 1990 will be accomphshed through the issuance of a revised NSPS in 1994, with the objective of reducing emissions by 2 miUion tons a year from 1980 emission levels. The teemission standards will not apply to cyclone and wet bottom boilers, unless alternative technologies are found, as these cannot be retrofitted with existing LNB technologies. 

The basis on which the TLVs are set may differ from substance to substance. For some, such as levels for silica dust, a guiding factor is protection against impairment of health. For others, it is the comfort level of the individual, such as freedom from irritation, nuisance, or other forms of stress for example, the TLV for sulfur dioxide is based on irritation and not on toxicity per se. The TLV list is reviewed annually resulting in some revisions in values and some additions to the list. 

After the hazard assessment has been conducted and the data has been collected, it should be organized in a logical outline that will estimate the potential for employee injury The organized data will help to decide the type of hazard(s) involved, the level of risk, and the seriousness of potential injury The appropriate levels of PPE are then selected based on the hazard determination and the availability of PPE. The user should be properly fitted for the specified PPE, and the employer should make sure that it is comfortable to wear. Hazard reassessments should be conducted as necessary based on the introduction of new or revised processes, equipment, and accident experience, to ensure the continued suitability of selection of the proper PPE. 

No matter what type of respirator is used, it is of the utmost importance that the revised respiratory standard is adhered to. The revised standard stresses training, documentation, written programs, medical surveillance, fit testing, and a variety of other subjects pertinent to respirators. Of particular interest to the authors is the new approach toward action levels, protection factors, and fit testing. Another important change is OSHAs latest approach on voluntary respirator use. With the new standard in effect, those workers previously considered to be voluntarily wearing respirators should be much better protected. 

---