Response functions energy

Under the common title of electron spectroscopy, this section discusses the most important problems of electron, positron, and beta-ray energy measurements back-scattering, energy resolution and detector response functions, energy calibration, and source preparation. 

Fluctuations of observables from their average values, unless the observables are constants of motion, are especially important, since they are related to the response fiinctions of the system. For example, the constant volume specific heat of a fluid is a response function related to the fluctuations in the energy of a system at constant N, V and T, where A is the number of particles in a volume V at temperature T. Similarly, fluctuations in the number density (p = N/V) of an open system at constant p, V and T, where p is the chemical potential, are related to the isothemial compressibility iCp which is another response fiinction. Temperature-dependent fluctuations characterize the dynamic equilibrium of themiodynamic systems, in contrast to the equilibrium of purely mechanical bodies in which fluctuations are absent. 

Linear response function approaches were introduced into the chemistry literature about thirty years ago Ref. [1,2]. At that time they were referred to as Green functions or propagator approaches. Soon after the introduction it became apparent that they offered a viable and attractive alternative to the state specific approaches for obtaining molecular properties as excitation energies, transition moments and second order molecular properties. 

The solid points show the experimental result, the long dashed line the calculation of a g(< )-modified Lindhard response function according to Equation (6), using g(q) after Utsumi and Ichimaru [5]. The solid line gives the result of a calculation that also takes into account self-energy effects on-shell, that is, introducing the lifetime of the involved states into the calculation according to Equation (14). One can clearly see that the latter reproduces the experimental result quite nicely. 

Koch H, Jensen HJA, Jorgensen P, Helgaker T (1990) Excitation-energies from the coupled cluster singles and doubles linear response function (CCSDLR) - applications to be, CH+, CO, and H2O. J Chem Phys 93 3345... 

Time-dependent response theory concerns the response of a system initially in a stationary state, generally taken to be the ground state, to a perturbation turned on slowly, beginning some time in the distant past. The assumption that the perturbation is turned on slowly, i.e. the adiabatic approximation, enables us to consider the perturbation to be of first order. In TD-DFT the density response dp, i.e. the density change which results from the perturbation dveff, enables direct determination of the excitation energies as the poles of the response function dP (the linear response of the KS density matrix in the basis of the unperturbed molecular orbitals) without formally having to calculate a(co). 

In the last three decades, density functional theory (DFT) has been extensively used to generate what may be considered as a general approach to the description of chemical reactivity [1-5]. The concepts that emerge from this theory are response functions expressed basically in terms of derivatives of the total energy and of the electronic density with respect to the number of electrons and to the external potential. As such, they correspond to conceptually simple, but at the same time, chemically meaningful quantities. 

The SP-DFT has been shown to be useful in the better understanding of chemical reactivity, however there is still work to be done. The usefulness of the reactivity indexes in the p-, p representation has not been received much attention but it is worth to explore them in more detail. Along this line, the new experiments where it is able to separate spin-up and spin-down electrons may be an open field in the applications of the theory with this variable set. Another issue to develop in this context is to define response functions of the system associated to first and second derivatives of the energy functional defined by Equation 10.1. But the challenge in this case would be to find the physical meaning of such quantities rather than build the mathematical framework because this is due to the linear dependence on the four-current and external potential. 

This chapter will be concerned with computing the three response functions discussed above—the chemical potential, the chemical hardness, and the Fukui function—as reliably as possible for a neutral molecule in the gas phase. This involves the evaluation of the derivative of the energy and electron density with respect to the number of electrons. 

Describing complex wave-packet motion on the two coupled potential energy surfaces, this quantity is also of interest since it can be monitored in femtosecond pump-probe experiments [163]. In fact, it has been shown in Ref. 126 employing again the quasi-classical approximation (104) that the time-and frequency-resolved stimulated emission spectrum is nicely reproduced by the PO calculation. Hence vibronic POs may provide a clear and physically appealing interpretation of femtosecond experiments reflecting coherent electron transfer. We note that POs have also been used in semiclassical trace formulas to calculate spectral response functions [3]. 

They reduce to regular energy derivatives in the static limit [48,50]. The linear response function... 

In its underlying physics, the use of susceptibilities to obtain E is related to the use of a generalized dielectric response function to determine the energy of a... 

---