Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Representative exposure

Analysis of most (perhaps 65%) pharmacokinetic data from clinical trials starts and stops with noncompartmental analysis (NCA). NCA usually includes calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of concentration versus time, or under the first-moment curve (AUMC, from a graph of concentration multiplied by time versus time). Calculation of AUC and AUMC facilitates simple calculations for some standard pharmacokinetic parameters and collapses measurements made at several sampling times into a single number representing exposure. The approach makes few assumptions, has few parameters, and allows fairly rigorous statistical description of exposure and how it is affected by dose. An exposure response model may be created. With respect to descriptive dimensions these dose-exposure and exposure-response models... [Pg.535]

Figure 29 (Qin and Liu, 1982) shows the behavior of individual particles above the distributor recorded by video camera of small clusters of particles, coated with a fluorescent material and spot-illuminated by a pulse of ultra violet light from an optical fiber. The sequential images, of which Fig. 29 just represents exposures after stated time intervals, were reconstructed to form the track of motion of the particle cluster shown in Fig. 30. Neither this track nor visual observation of the shallow bed while fluidized, reveal any vestige of bubbles. Instead, the particles are thrown up by the high velocity jets issuing from the distributor orifices to several times their static bed height. Figure 29 (Qin and Liu, 1982) shows the behavior of individual particles above the distributor recorded by video camera of small clusters of particles, coated with a fluorescent material and spot-illuminated by a pulse of ultra violet light from an optical fiber. The sequential images, of which Fig. 29 just represents exposures after stated time intervals, were reconstructed to form the track of motion of the particle cluster shown in Fig. 30. Neither this track nor visual observation of the shallow bed while fluidized, reveal any vestige of bubbles. Instead, the particles are thrown up by the high velocity jets issuing from the distributor orifices to several times their static bed height.
Human TClo values of 3 ppm (no duration specified) and 325 micrograms per cubic meter (lig/m3) (0.1 ppm) (no duration specified) have been reported (RTECS 1987). Henderson and Haggard (1943) (as cited in AIHA1993) noted that exposure of humans to arsine at 3-10 ppm for a few hours may result in signs and symptoms of poisoning. Similar to the data set for acute lethality, most information on nonlethal effects of arsine exposure in humans are case reports representing exposure estimates. [Pg.90]

To evaluate inhalation toxicity in situations where workers are exposed to various concentrations and durations of a drug vapor, aerosol, or powder in the work environment during manufacturing or packaging, a more comprehensive determination of E(COso or L(Ct)so values are used. The E(Ct)50 or L(Ct)so values are statistically derived values that represent the magnitude of exposure, expressed as a function of the product of C and t, that is expected to affect or kill less than 50% and more than 50% of the animals. The other curve represents exposures that kill 50% or more than 50% of each group of animals (Irish and Adams, 1940). [Pg.349]

Once the data are computed in this fashion, there are three numbers to associate with each point on the surface of Figure 2 the probability that the environment is OK the probability that it is NOT OK and the probability that no decision can be made on the basis of one exposure estimate. Therefore, a complete comparison between Figure 2 and the three decision criteria in this report requires careful consideration of ten 3-dimensional surfaces. This is not practical, so it is necessary to define contours of significance which can be used to provide a rapid, easily understood comparison of the different behavior of the three decision criteria. The first is the contour of unbiased decisions, and the other three are the contours marking the boundaries of the regions where one decision is the most likely outcome of evaluating the meaning of one representative exposure estimate. [Pg.476]

The PLEX database is considered to be a conservative representation (overestimation) of potential exposure for populations served by CWS. The population-linked estimates of atrazine and simazine concentrations represent exposure to persons consuming potable water from regulated water supplies. However, this exposure could be overestimated. The atrazine and simazine databases are dominated by nondetections (92.3% and 98.8%, respectively). Many water... [Pg.444]

Figure 3. RBS fluorine intensity per 2.5 nC interval as a function of total charge for PTFE and fluorinated PMDA-ODA films. Given times represent exposure of films to an 02 rich plasma. Figure 3. RBS fluorine intensity per 2.5 nC interval as a function of total charge for PTFE and fluorinated PMDA-ODA films. Given times represent exposure of films to an 02 rich plasma.
Outside dosimeters are on the outside of the outermost layer of clothing, in order to represent exposures resulting from contact of bare skin with the treated foliage. [Pg.63]

Two types of dietary exposure are understood. Chronic exposure represents exposure to pesticide residues in food over a relatively extended time period, frequently assumed to be the course of a lifetime. In contrast, acute exposure represents exposure to pesticide residues in food over a relatively short time period, usually over the course of one day. Most of the significant differences between the EU and US approaches to dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment focus on acute dietary exposure. Some of the differences have their sources in the different types of data available in the two areas. Other differences have their sources in different regulatory policies or societal viewpoints. [Pg.355]

AEGL-I is the airborne concentration (expressed as ppm or mgm ) of a substance at or above which it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible but excluding hypersusceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort. Airborne concentrations below AEGL-I represent exposure levels that could produce mild odor, taste, or other sensory irritations. [Pg.977]

Risk Assessment — A Multidisciplinary Process. Sound risk assessment must be considered as a multidisciplinary function relying upon data and experience from toxicology, epidemiology, clinical medicine and Industrial hygiene or engineering representing exposure aspects of substances or agents. [Pg.157]

Information on representative exposures must be linked to information about cases of occupational asthma, which should be as complete as possible. However, this is a new area for research and most exposure-response analyses so far have come from research which is likely to be seriously deficient the number of cases is underestimated or they are unrepresentative of cases in general or both. This is because most research has used prevalence measures (number of cases present/number of workers at risk) within dynamic population cross-sections (those working in a workplace at one point in time). This approach yields data rapidly but is at risk of survivor bias. Workers with respiratory symptoms related to their work are much more likely to leave their job than other workers and it is likely that this selective turnover operates most strongly in the most highly exposed jobs. [Pg.62]

There are three types of defenses against toxic materials internal, antidotal, and external. Three things can happen once a chemical is taken into the body metabolism, storage, and excretion. Internal defenses are the ability of the body to get rid of a toxic material, sometimes referred to as metabohsm. The body normally excretes waste materials through the feces or urine. Additionally, women can also excrete through the ova and breast mUk. In these instances, the excretions from the mother represent exposure to the offspring. [Pg.277]

Portfolio quality and diversification The portfolio of CDS represents exposure to a pool of 100 different corporate and financial entities representing over 20 industries across multiple countries. The exposures are principally investment grade, which offers a diversification from cash CDO portfolios. [Pg.490]

Another aspect is the role of nitrogen in the surface. It was considered that the increase in its concentration after electrolytic oxidation represented exposure of nitrile residues in the core , but recent work by Alexander and Jones demonstrated that the carboxyl groups that form can react with ammonium hydroxide in the aqueous electrolytes to give an amide functionality. [Pg.180]

The term sampling strategy , as used here, means the assembly of a series of decisions about how to make a set of measurements represent exposure for a particular purpose. An optimum strategy requires selection of the elements under the control of the exposure assessor that most efficiently achieve the objectives, given the physical circumstances and environmental variability (Health and Safety Executive 1989). An important factor in the design of any measurement scheme is the degree of variability in the system being observed. This variability affects both the number of samples to be taken and the accuracy of the results that can expected. Possible causes of variability typically observed include ... [Pg.88]

C) Results of any exposure monitoring done for that employee and the representative exposure levels supplied to the physician and... [Pg.959]

Representative exposure Measurements of an employee s noise dose or 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound level that the employer deems to be representative of the exposures of other employees in the workplace. [Pg.418]

Hearing loss is presumed to be work-related if the employee is exposed to noise in the workplace at an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dBA or greater, or to a total noise dose of 50 percent, as defined in OSHA s Occupational Noise Exposure standard. Noise dose is defined as the amount of actual employee exposure to noise relative to the permissible exposure limit for noise. A dose greater than 100 percent represents exposure above the limit. For hearing loss cases where the employee is not exposed to this level of noise, refer to the rules in 1904.5 to determine if the hearing loss is work-related. [Pg.301]

In November 2006 the mission survey was carried out among a random net sample of 30000 from the TNS-NIPO Internet Panel that has approximately 200000 members of which about 50000 constitute a representative sample of the Dutch working population so in practice the 30000 were drawn from the 50000. For each mission the respondents filled out how many hours they were exposed in the week preceding the survey. To obtain representative exposure data for the Dutch working population, major devi-... [Pg.1349]


See other pages where Representative exposure is mentioned: [Pg.263]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.782]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.977]    [Pg.977]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.957]    [Pg.1076]    [Pg.1123]    [Pg.1143]    [Pg.1165]    [Pg.1423]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.819]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.90 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info