Relaxation dynamic processes

We make one important note here regarding nomenclature. Early explanations of CIDNP invoked an Overhauser-type mechanism, implying a dynamic process similar to spin relaxation hence the word dynamic m the CIDNP acronym. This is now known to be incorrect, but the acronym has prevailed in its infant fomi. 

In polymers one will often particularly be interested in very slow dynamic processes. The solid echo technique just described is still limited by the transverse relaxation time T being of the order of a few ps at most. The ultimate limitation in every NMR experiment however, is not T but the longitudinal relaxation time T, which for 2H in solid polymers typically is much longer, being in the range 10 ms to 10 s. The spin alignment technique (20) circumvents transverse relaxation and is limited by Tx only, thus ultraslow motions become accessible of experiment. 

Multidimensional and heteronuclear NMR techniques have revolutionised the use of NMR spectroscopy for the structure determination of organic molecules from small to complex. Multidimensional NMR also allows observation of forbidden multiple-quantum transitions and probing of slow dynamic processes, such as chemical exchange, cross-relaxation, transient Over-hauser effects, and spin-diffusion in solids. 

Since it has been shown that nonideal mixing occurs in the 2.5-15.0 dyn cm 1 range, the excess free energies of interaction were calculated for compressions of each pure component and their mixtures to each of these surface pressures. In addition, these surface pressures are below the ESPs and/or monolayer stability limits so that dynamic processes arising from reorganization, relaxation, or film loss do not contribute significantly to the work of compression. 

A particular characteristic feature of dynamic processes in the vicinity of the glass transition is the ubiquity of the Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts (KWW) stretched exponential relaxation 1,7-9... 

Here keg- describes the dynamic process (e.g. the transverse relaxation rate R2, or the diffusion coefficient D) and r describes a time constant typical for the experimental setup. By use of Eq.(l) the kegf can be written as follows ... 

The description of the real process of dipole-orientational relaxation by one parameter xR is a first-order approximation which is far removed from reality even in studies with model solvents.(89) A set of relaxation times would exist in real systems. However, such an approximation is necessary since it allows rather simple models of relaxation to be developed and to be compared with the results of experiments. xR may be considered as a simple effective parameter characterizing the dynamic processes. 

As shown above, the intrinsic fluorescence spectra of proteins as well as coenzyme groups and probes shift within very wide ranges depending on their environment. Since the main contribution to spectral shifts is from relaxational properties of the environment, the analysis of relaxation is the necessary first step in establishing correlations of protein structure with fluorescence spectra. Furthermore, the study of relaxation dynamics is a very important approach to the analysis of the fluctuation rates of the electrostatic field in proteins, which is of importance for the understanding of biocatalytic processes and charge transport. Here we will discuss briefly the most illustrative results obtained by the methods of molecular relaxation spectroscopy. 

The discussion of the mechanisms and models of the relaxation process given in Section 2.5 shows that the application of time-resolved methods produces substantial advantages in accessing dynamical information, but it does not allow the complete pattern of the dynamic process to be obtained. The analysis of the experimental results requires that a particular dynamic model be assumed. Information on the dynamics is obtained from studies of the dependence of emission intensity on two parameters the frequency (or the wavelength) of emission and on time. The function 7(vem, t) may be investigated by two types of potentially equivalent experiments ... 

Despite the high energy resolution and extreme surface sensitivity only few studies on the dynamics of adsorbate covered surfaces have been performed so far by He scattering " However, the vibrational states of adsorbates are relevant for most dynamical surface processes like scattering, accommodation, desorption, or diffusion, and therefore, their nature and relaxation dynamics deserve more attention. 

To summarize, the results presented for five representative examples of nonadiabatic dynamics demonstrate the ability of the MFT method to account for a qualitative description of the dynamics in case of processes involving two electronic states. The origin of the problems to describe the correct long-time relaxation dynamics as well as multi-state processes will be discussed in more detail in Section VI. Despite these problems, it is surprising how this simplest MQC method can describe complex nonadiabatic dynamics. Other related approximate methods such as the quantum-mechanical TDSCF approximation have been found to completely fail to account for the long-time behavior of the electronic dynamics (see Fig. 10). This is because the standard Hartree ansatz in the TDSCF approach neglects all correlations between the dynamical DoF, whereas the ensemble average performed in the MFT treatment accounts for the static correlation of the problem. 

Below Tg, in the glassy state the main dynamic process is the secondary relaxation or the )0-process, also called Johari-Goldstein relaxation [116]. Again, this process has been well known for many years in polymer physics [111], and its features have been estabhshed from studies using relaxation techniques. This relaxation occurs independently of the existence of side groups in the polymer. It has traditionally been attributed to local relaxation of flexible parts (e.g. side groups) and, in main chain polymers, to twisting or crankshaft motion in the main chain [116]. Two well-estabhshed features characterize the secondary relaxation. 

The dynamic process driving the decay of the interchain correlations in glassforming polymers is the structural a-relaxation. The direct microscopic obser-... 

From this comparison it follows that the observation of the structural relaxation by standard relaxation techniques in general might be hampered by contributions of other dynamic processes. It is also noteworthy that the structural relaxation time at a given temperature is slower than the characteristic time determined for the a-relaxation by spectroscopic techniques [105]. An isolation of the structural relaxation and its direct microscopic study is only possible through investigation of the dynamic structure factor at the interchain peak - and NSE is essential for this purpose. 

In the previous section it has been shown that the temporal evolution of the pair correlations at the interchain peak is governed by the structural relaxation. If we move now towards more local scales - i.e. higher Q-values - we see that the static correlations observed in Spair(Q) correspond to pair correlations along a given chain. It is then natural to think that their time dependence might relate to dynamic processes other than the structural relaxation. 

It is noteworthy that the neutron work in the merging region, which demonstrated the statistical independence of a- and j8-relaxations, also opened a new approach for a better understanding of results from dielectric spectroscopy on polymers. For the dielectric response such an approach was in fact proposed by G. Wilhams a long time ago [200] and only recently has been quantitatively tested [133,201-203]. As for the density fluctuations that are seen by the neutrons, it is assumed that the polarization is partially relaxed via local motions, which conform to the jS-relaxation. While the dipoles are participating in these motions, they are surrounded by temporary local environments. The decaying from these local environments is what we call the a-process. This causes the subsequent total relaxation of the polarization. Note that as the atoms in the density fluctuations, all dipoles participate at the same time in both relaxation processes. An important success of this attempt was its application to PB dielectric results [133] allowing the isolation of the a-relaxation contribution from that of the j0-processes in the dielectric response. Only in this way could the universality of the a-process be proven for dielectric results - the deduced temperature dependence of the timescale for the a-relaxation follows that observed for the structural relaxation (dynamic structure factor at Q ax) and also for the timescale associated with the viscosity (see Fig. 4.8). This feature remains masked if one identifies the main peak of the dielectric susceptibility with the a-relaxation. 

---