Refuse composition

The composition of the solid waste has been changing over the past two decades. This is because of the changing needs of the society as well as some of the process and manufacturing needs and refinements. Table 15.3 shows the immediate past, present, and near-term projected refuse composition. 

A typical refuse composition shown in Table 8.10 indicates that in the U.S., paper, yard waste, and food waste are the predominating refuse components. Table 8.11 shows the mean composition of municipal refuse in the U.S. the standard deviations, also listed, indicate the variations that one might expect. 

Solid Wastes and Biomass Large and increasing quantities of solid wastes are a significant feature of affluent societies. In the United States in 1993 the rate was about 1.8 kg (4 lb) per capita per day or nearly 190 Tg (2.07 X 10 U.S. tons) per year, but the growth rate has slowed in recent years as recycling efforts have increased. Table 27-4 shows that the composition of miscellaneous refuse is surprisingly uniform, but size and moisture variations cause major difficulties in efficient, economical disposal. 

An incinerator will usually have a fuel of varying chemical composition and physical properties, as well as varying moisture content and heating value. Also, the fuel fired in one locality may be vastly different from that fired by an incinerator of similar size and design in another locality. Refuse production in the United States has been estimated to average 2.5 kg per person per day in 1970, increasing to 10 kg per person per day by the year 2000. 

Abstract Looking for the possibility of using Refused Derived Fuels (RDF) in the substitution of fossil fuels is one of the main subjects in the Waste to Energy aspect. Therefore this study has been taken in this direction. The influence of waste composition on RDF quality produced by Dry Stabilization Process (DSP) and the evaluation of C02 emission of this product were undertaken. 

Keywords Refused Derived Fuels (RDF), Dry Stabilization Process (DSP), Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), Waste composition, Waste amount, Heating value, Emission Factor (EF)... 

Anaerobic microbes in the presence of water in the landfill will consume these natural products and produce methane, CO2 and humus. One study reported the average composition of 20 year old refuse to be 33 % paper, 22% ash and 12% wood [18]. Thirty core samples revealed a wide range of degradation and microbial activity that were directly attributed to sample moisture content. Recovered polyethylene degradation was evaluated and determined to be as high as 54 %. 

Under Article 26, the grounds for refusing a marketing authorisation have been amended under the review. The new provision allows a refusal if the risk-benefit balance of the product is not favourable, if the therapeutic efficacy is insufficiently substantiated, or if its qualitative and quantitative composition is not as declared. The application may also be refused if the documents are not submitted in accordance with the requirements set out in the Directive. The MA holder/applicant is responsible for the accuracy of the data and documentation submitted. The rmfavourable risk-benefit balance is the additional ground for refusal, although in practice this has previously been applied. 

Greenberg RR, Zoller WH, Gordon SE. 1978. Composition and size distribution of particles released in refuse incinerators. Environmental Science and Technology 12 566-573. 

Hopke, et al. (4) and Gaarenstroom, Perone, and Moyers (7) used the common factor analysis approach in their analyses of the Boston and Tucson area aerosol composition, respectively. In the Boston data, for 90 samples at a variety of sites, six common factors were identified that were interpreted as soil, sea salt, oil-fired power plants, motor vehicles, refuse incineration and an unknown manganese-selenium source. The six factors accounted for about 78 of the system variance. There was also a high unique factor for bromine that was interpreted to be fresh automobile exhaust. Large unique factors for antimony and selenium were found. These factors may possibly represent emission of volatile species whose concentrations do not oovary with other elements emitted by the same source. 

As discussed above, many detailed studies of sources are needed to establish compositions of source components for receptor-model use. Coal-fired power plants have been studied more than other sources, but even In that case, there are not nearly enough data to establish trends for predicting components for plants that have not been studied. The situation Is much worse for most other sources, except possibly refuse Incinerators, of which the three studied release particles of very similar compositions (9, 10). 

Authorization can be refused if, after verification of the submitted data, it appears that the drug is harmful under the conditions of use stated at the time of application for authorization, it has no therapeutic effect or tire applicant has not provided sufficient proof of such an effect, its qualitative and quantitative composition has not been stated, or the recommended withdrawal period is not long enough to ensure that foodstuffs obtained from treated animals do not contain residues that might constitute a health hazard for consumers. 

The composition of vat refuse—soda waste—according to Unger s analysis is as follows. 

The Clean Air Act of 1990 has made trace metal content in fuels and wastes the final ash-related compositional characteristic of significance. Considerable attention is paid (ca 1993) to emissions of such metals as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc. The concentration of these metals in both grate ash and flyash is of significance as a result of federal and state requirements of particular importance is the mobility of metals. This mobility, and the consequent toxicity of the ash product, is determined by the Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (tclp) test. Tables 8—10 present trace metal contents for wood wastes and agricultural wastes, municipal waste, and refuse-derived fuel, respectively. In Table 8, the specific concentration of various components in the RDF governs the expected average concentration of trace metals. 

Even more exciting, for both De Luc and for Watt, at least initially, was Priestley s announcement in 1783 of his conversion of water into air in an earthenware retort merely by heating. We have seen that this encouraged Watt to put forward his long-gestating theory of the composition of water, and confirmed De Luc in his theory of water vapour and rain. When Priestley subsequendy reported that his experiment had been in error, both Watt and De Luc denied that this reversal put their theories in danger. Watt had merely denied that it demolished his theory. De Luc refused to believe Priestley s retraction. 

CLYSSUS — is a composite species made of the several varieties of any matter, separately elaborated. Thus, Clyssus may embrace the entire essence of a substance, when, all impurities and refuse having been separated, the essential parts of the species are amalgamated into one composition. Or, it is the extraction of the subtlety of all portions of a plant, commonly conjoined. The unification is accomplished in two ways. All the extracted virtues of the various members are conjoined and incorporated, or, otherwise, the oil is obtained in one cucurbit, the salt in another, the aqueous liquor in a third, and then the three are distilled through a common channel communicating... 

SCORIA — Slag, Refuse, the Coarse Matter which is separated from the rest of the composition. Also the foundation of Mercury. 

---