Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reflected electron energy-loss

Reflected Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (REELS)... [Pg.25]

Reflected Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (REELS) has elemental sensitivities on the order of a few tenths of a percent, phase discrimination at the few-percent level, operator controllable depth resolution from several nm to 0.07 nm, and a lateral resolution as low as 100 nm. [Pg.324]

A. J. Bevolo. Scanning Electron Microscopy. 1985, vol. 4, p. 1449. (Scanning Electron Microscopy, Inc. Elk Grove Village, IL) Thorough exposition of the principles and applications of reflected electron energy-loss microscopy (REELM) as well as a comparison to other techniques, such as SAM, EDS and SEM. [Pg.334]

REELM Reflection Electron Energy-Loss Microscopy... [Pg.765]

REELS Reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy... [Pg.92]

How then, can one recover some quantity that scales with the local charge on the metal atoms if their valence electrons are inherently delocalized Beyond the asymmetric lineshape of the metal 2p3/2 peak, there is also a distinct satellite structure seen in the spectra for CoP and elemental Co. From reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy (REELS), we have determined that this satellite structure originates from plasmon loss events (instead of a two-core-hole final state effect as previously thought [67,68]) in which exiting photoelectrons lose some of their energy to valence electrons of atoms near the surface of the solid [58]. The intensity of these satellite peaks (relative to the main peak) is weaker in CoP than in elemental Co. This implies that the Co atoms have fewer valence electrons in CoP than in elemental Co, that is, they are definitely cationic, notwithstanding the lack of a BE shift. For the other compounds in the MP (M = Cr, Mn, Fe) series, the satellite structure is probably too weak to be observed, but solid solutions Coi -xMxl> and CoAs i yPv do show this feature (vide infra) [60,61]. [Pg.116]

Au and Pt compounds. The Tougaard method gave approximately 3% RSD from theory, which is of the order of the expected uncertainty due to the effects of instrumental stability and the errors in the ratio of photoionization cross-sections258. Additional considerations for background correction were made from reflection electron energy-loss spectroscopy (REELS) measurements at different take-off angles259. [Pg.189]

REEES reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy SDW... [Pg.90]

REELS, ELS (reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy) and EELES, EXELES (extended electron energy loss fine structure) work with a higher fixed energy of the primary electrons (50 200 eV and 10 80 keV, respectively) and higher energy losses of the scattered primary electrons ranging from 0.005 eV to several hundred and from 200—4000 ey respectively. [Pg.535]

RAIS Reflection-Absorption Infrared Spectroscopy, 33 RBS Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry, 36 REELS Reflection Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy, 18, 34 REM Reflection Electron Microscopy ... [Pg.596]

Modern reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy has its origins in work by Powell (1960), Robins and Swan (1960) and Best (1962), while Gerlach et al. (1970) and Gerlach and Du Charme (1972) showed that core ionisation could be studied in reflection. Surprisingly there is no comprehensive review of this field as far as electronic excitations are concerned, but the article by Froitzheim (1977) may be a useful starting point. [Pg.549]

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of (a) transmission electron energy loss (b) reflection electron energy loss (c) excitation outside the surface in reflection electron energy loss (d) momentum conservation in the energy loss process. Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of (a) transmission electron energy loss (b) reflection electron energy loss (c) excitation outside the surface in reflection electron energy loss (d) momentum conservation in the energy loss process.
REELS reflection electron energy loss spectrometry... [Pg.1414]

IMFPs calculated from optical data have also been assessed by other experimental techniques. Analyses of measured and calculated AES and XPS intensities for 60 elemental solids [80], thicknesses of thin Si02 films by multiple techniques [81], and reflection-electron energy-loss experiments for various materials [82] indicate that the uncertainty of the IMFPs from optical data and from the TPP-2M equation was about 10%. [Pg.228]


See other pages where Reflected electron energy-loss is mentioned: [Pg.1325]    [Pg.1325]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.1325]    [Pg.1325]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.1383]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.1411]    [Pg.84]   


SEARCH



Electron Energy-Loss

Electron loss

Electrons reflection

Electrons reflectivity

REELS, EELS (reflection electron energy loss

Reflected Electron Energy-loss Spectroscopy, REELS

Reflected electron energy-loss microscopy

Reflection electron energy-loss spectroscopy

Reflection electron energy-loss spectroscopy REELS)

Reflection losses

Reflective losses

© 2024 chempedia.info