Reactive separation absorption

Reactive absorption is probably the most widely applied type of a reactive separation process. It is used for production purposes in a number of classical bulk-chemical technologies, such as nitric or sulfuric acid. It is also often employed in gas purification processes, e.g., to remove carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide. Other interesting areas of application include olefin/paraffin separations, where reactive absorption with reversible chemical complexation appears to be a promising alternative to the cryogenic distillation (62). 

Reactive distillation Membrane-based reactive separations Reactive adsorption Reactive absorption Reactive extraction Reactive crystallization... 

The most important examples of reactive separation processes (RSPs) are reactive distillation (RD), reactive absorption (RA), and reactive extraction (RE). In RD, reaction and distillation take place within the same zone of a distillation column. Reactants are converted to products, with simultaneous separation of the products and recycling of unused reactants. The RD process can be efficient in both size and cost of capital equipment and in energy used to achieve a complete conversion of reactants. Since reactor costs are often less than 10% of the capital investment, the combination of a relatively cheap reactor with a distillation column offers great potential for overall savings. Among suitable RD processes are etherifications, nitrations, esterifications, transesterifications, condensations, and alcylations (2). 

This chapter concerns the most important reactive separation processes reactive absorption, reactive distillation, and reactive extraction. These operations combining the separation and reaction steps inside a single column are advantageous as compared to traditional unit operations. The three considered processes are similar and at the same time very different. Therefore, their common modeling basis is discussed and their peculiarities are illustrated with a number of industrially relevant case studies. The theoretical description is supported by the results of laboratory-, pilot-, and industrial-scale experimental investigations. Both steady-state and dynamic issues are treated in addition, the design of column internals is addressed. 

Noeres C, Kenig EY, Gorak A. Modelling of reactive separation processes reactive absorption and reactive distillation. Chem Eng Process 2003 42 157-178. 

The possibility of combining a reaction unit and a separation unit into one reactive separation unit has not been considered in this chapter. However, some of the textbooks, Coulson et al.2 and Seader and Henley,1 give a brief discussion of this type of equipment for distillation and absorption, respectively. A lot of research has also been devoted to this type of operation in recent years and it is generally believed that it will become more widely used in the future. 

Reactive absorption is essentially an old process which has been known since the foundation of modern industry. This is also a very important process, being the basic operation in many technological chains. More recently, the role of reactive absorption as a key environmental protection process has grown up significantly, and today the process appears to be the most widely applied reactive separation operation. 

This chapter presents an overview of reactive absorption, which is one of the most important industrial reactive separation operations. Industrially relevant systems and equipment are highlighted, the modeling basics and peculiarities are detailed, and the methods of model parameter estimation are discussed. Both steady-state and dynamic modeling issues are addressed. The implementation of the theoretical description is illustrated with a number of up-to-date applications and validated against laboratory-, pilot- and industrial-scale experiments. 

The mathematical model comprises a set of partial differential equations of convective diffusion and heat conduction as well as the Navier-Stokes equations written for each phase separately. For the description of reactive separation processes (e.g. reactive absorption, reactive distillation), the reaction terms are introduced either as source terms in the convective diffusion and heat conduction equations or in the boundary condition at the channel wall, depending on whether the reaction is homogeneous or heterogeneous. The solution yields local concentration and temperature fields, which are used for calculation of the concentration and temperature profiles along the column. 

Reactive separations are tvidespread operations. In typical reactive separation processes such as reactive absorption or distillation the superposition of reaction and separation is deliberately used. In other cases, simultaneous reaction and separation simply cannot be avoided. This is, for instance, the case when side reactions occur in separation equipment or when intrinsically chemically reactive mixtures, such as solutions of weak electrolytes or formaldehyde solutions, have to be separated. Furthermore, in many reactors products are directly removed, which is basically a reactive separation. 

Today, RD is discussed as one part of the broader area of reactive separation, which comprises any combination of chemical reaction with separation such as distillation, stripping, absorption, extraction, adsorption, crystallization, and membrane separation. In the next decade, unifying approaches to reactive separators should be developed allowing the rigorous selection of the most suitable type of separation to be integrated into a chemical reactor. 

There are two distinct categories of reactive separations. In one category, the reaction aids separation and in the other separation aids the reaction. In the former, decreasing or eliminating the mass-transfer resistance on the liquid side by allowing the solute to react with a non-volatile non-diffusing component as in the absorption of CO2 into an amine solution enhances the mass-transfer rate. Absorption with reaction has been practised for the removal of CO2 and H2S over the past several decades, and an extensive literature is available. Similarly, in distillation, reactive entrainers are used to separate close boiling or azeotropic mixtures [19]). 

C. Noeres, E. Y. Kenig, A. Gorak, Modeling of Reactive Separation Processes Reactive Absorption and Reactive Distillation, Chem. Eng. Process., 2003,42,157-178. 

Chapter 7 will consider separations achieved under the bulk flow-force combination of (b). Separation systems utilizing the configurations of (c) are treated in Chapter 8. (There will be occasional examples of two combinations of bulk flow and force directions.) Chapters 6, 7 and 8 will generally employ one separator vessel. Reactive separations will be treated immediately alongside non-reactive separations as often as possible. Different feed introduction modes will be considered as required in all three configurations, (a), (b) and (c). Multistage separation schemes, widely used in the processes of gas absorption, distillation, solvent extraction, etc., are studied in Chapter 8 when only one vessel is used. When multiple devices are used to form a separation cascade, an introductory treatment is provided in Chapter 9. 

CF2 is unique among carbenes because of its high stability and low reactivity. Investigations of the ultraviolet absorption spectrum of CF2 have led to estimates of roughly 10 milliseconds to one minute for the half-life of CF2 at pressures in the region of one atmosphere. The gas phase molecule does not react with BF3, N20, S02, CS2 or CF3I at 120 °C5 K The nature of CF2 is perhaps best presented in separate sections discussing its preparation, structure and physical properties, reaction chemistry, and reaction kinetics. 

Rbo is a homodimeric protein, each subunit of which contains two distinct mononuclear nonheme iron centers in separate domains (Fig. 10.4) (Coehlo et al. 1997). Center I contains a distorted rubredoxin-type [Fe(SCys)4] coordination sphere. [Fe(SCys)4] sites in proteins are known to catalyze exclusively electron transfer, which is, therefore, the putative function for center I. Center II contains a unique [Fe(NHis)4(SCys)] site that is rapidly oxidized by 0, and is, therefore, the likely site of superoxide reduction (Lombard et al. 2000). A blue nonheme iron protein, neelaredoxin (Nlr) from Desulfovibrio gigas (Silva et al. 1999), contains an iron center closely resembling that of Rbo center II (Table 10.1). The blue color is due to the oxidized (i.e., Fe(III)) form [Fe(NHis)4(SCys)] site, which, in both Nlr and Rbo, has a prominent absorption feature at -650 nm. Reduction of center II to its Fe(II) form fully bleaches its visible absorption. These absorption features have been used to probe the reactivity of Rbo with superoxidie. 

The basis for the claim of discovery of an element has varied over the centuries. The method of discovery of the chemical elements in the late eightenth and the early nineteenth centuries used the properties of the new sustances, their separability, the colors of their compounds, the shapes of their crystals and their reactivity to determine the existence of new elements. In those early days, atomic weight values were not available, and there was no spectral analysis that would later be supplied by arc, spark, absorption, phosphorescent or x-ray spectra. Also in those days, there were many claims, e.g., the discovery of certain rare earth elements of the lanthanide series, which involved the discovery of a mineral ore, from which an element was later extracted. The honor of discovery has often been accorded not to the person who first isolated the element but to the person who discovered the original mineral itself, even when the ore was impure and that ore actually contained many elements. The reason for this is that in the case of these rare earth elements, the earth now refers to oxides of a metal not to the metal itself This fact was not realized at the time of their discovery, until the English chemist Humphry Davy showed that earths were compounds of oxygen and metals in 1808. 

---