Reactive iron barrier

One of the most attractive features for permeable reactive iron barriers (PRBs) is the low operating costs in comparison to alternative treatment technologies. In addition, the efficiency of PRBs is suggested to exceed 5 to 10 years (USEPA, 1998), which additionally contributes to efficient operation. PRBs have been constructed in two basic design configurations funnel-and-gate and continuous PRB. 

Faulkner D, Hopkinson L, Cundy AB. (2005). In situ electrokinetic generation of reactive iron barriers in sediment implications for contaminated land. Mineralogical Magazine 69(5) 749-757. 

The reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated solvents in the presence of iron is believed to be a charge-transfer process, which also involves oxidation of the iron and dissociation of water. In the subsurface, where no oxygen is present, the reaction is believed to be driven by the iron corrosion reaction. However, the mechanism for this process is not yet known. In fact, it is safe to say that development of the emplacement and design technology for reactive iron barriers has rapidly outpaced the development of a satisfactory theory for the reaction process. 

Puls RW, Paul CJ, Powell RM. The application of in situ permeable reactive (zero-valent iron) barrier technology for the remediation of chromate-contaminated groundwater a field test. Appl Geochem 1999 14 989-1000. 

E. E. NuxoU, T. Shimotori, W. A. Arnold, E. L. Cussler, Iron nanoparticles in reactive environmental barriers, paper presented otAIChE Annual Meeting, 2003. 

The redox potential for reduction of chromate therefore represents a critical threshold, below which chromium is contained, and above which chromium is mobilized. Sufficient reducing capacity to maintain the redox intensity below this threshold could be provided, for example, by including zero-valent iron or organic compost in reactive engineered barriers. This is not necessarily suggested as an engineering solution for Cr containment in particular each contaminant and each site need full and detailed consideration. It is only used here to illustrate the point that redox transformations have a potentially important role in the design and performance of reactive barriers for containment of wastes other than radionuclides. 

A permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is defined as an in situ method for remediating contaminated groundwater that combines a passive chemical or biological treatment zone with subsurface fluid flow management. Treatment media may include zero-valent iron, chelators, sorbents, and microbes to address a wide variety of groundwater contaminants, such as chlorinated solvents, other organics,... 

The use of nanoscale materials in the dean-up of hazardous waste sites is termed nanoremediation. Remediation of soil contaminated with pentachloro phenol using NZVI was studied [198]. In a separate study, soils contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls was treated using iron nanopartides [194], NZVI and iron oxide have been suggested to be used as a colloidal reactive barrier for in situ groundwater remediation due to its strong and spedfic interactions with Pb and As compounds [199]. 

Kanel, S.R., Greneche, J.M. and Choi, H. (2006) ArsenicfV) removal from groundwater using nano scale zero-valent iron as a colloidal reactive barrier material. Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 2045—2050. 

G.K (1999) Biogeochemical dynamics in zero-valent iron columns Implications for permeable reactive barriers. Environ. Sd. Tedm. 33 21709-2177 Gu, X.Y. Hsu, P.H. (1987) Hydrolytic formation of submicron iron(III) oxides from diluted ferric nitrate solutions. Soil Sd. Soc. Am. J. 51 469-474... 

Before one of the zero-valent iron treatment processes can be used at a site, extensive batch tests must be performed. Then, column tests are performed for several months to predict performance based on site conditions. Following pilot tests that take 6 months to a year, full-scale operation may begin. Thorough research of the site has to be conducted. For the treatment to be successful, the precise water velocity, depth of contamination, and soil matrix have to be known (Wilson, 1995). Errors in these calculations would cause the treatment to be ineffective in contaminant removal. From these results, the size of the barrier is determined by the least reactive contaminant. 

Manganese (oxy)(hydr)oxide sorbents and manganese-oxidizing bacteria Permeable reactive barriers with lime, iron oxides, and limestone Siderite (coprecipitation and possibly sorption)... 

---