Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Unique reaction rate

Complex chemical mechanisms are written as sequences of elementary steps satisfying detailed balance where tire forward and reverse reaction rates are equal at equilibrium. The laws of mass action kinetics are applied to each reaction step to write tire overall rate law for tire reaction. The fonn of chemical kinetic rate laws constmcted in tliis manner ensures tliat tire system will relax to a unique equilibrium state which can be characterized using tire laws of tliennodynamics. [Pg.3054]

In summary, solvents can influence Diels-Alder reactions through a multitude of different interactions, of which the contributions to fire overall rate uniquely depend on the particular solvent-diene-dienophile combination. Scientists usually feel uncomfortable about such a situation and try to extract generalities. When limited to the most extensively studied type A Diels-Alder reactions this approach seems feasible. These Diels-Alder reactions are dominated by hydrogen bonding interactions in combination with solvophobic interactions. This observation predicts a very special role of water as a solvent for type A Diels-Alder reactions, which is described in Section 1.4. [Pg.10]

The action of redox metal promoters with MEKP appears to be highly specific. Cobalt salts appear to be a unique component of commercial redox systems, although vanadium appears to provide similar activity with MEKP. Cobalt activity can be supplemented by potassium and 2inc naphthenates in systems requiring low cured resin color lithium and lead naphthenates also act in a similar role. Quaternary ammonium salts (14) and tertiary amines accelerate the reaction rate of redox catalyst systems. The tertiary amines form beneficial complexes with the cobalt promoters, faciUtating the transition to the lower oxidation state. Copper naphthenate exerts a unique influence over cure rate in redox systems and is used widely to delay cure and reduce exotherm development during the cross-linking reaction. [Pg.319]

Figure 10 shows that Tj is a unique function of the Thiele modulus. When the modulus ( ) is small (- SdSl), the effectiveness factor is unity, which means that there is no effect of mass transport on the rate of the catalytic reaction. When ( ) is greater than about 1, the effectiveness factor is less than unity and the reaction rate is influenced by mass transport in the pores. When the modulus is large (- 10), the effectiveness factor is inversely proportional to the modulus, and the reaction rate (eq. 19) is proportional to k ( ), which, from the definition of ( ), implies that the rate and the observed reaction rate constant are proportional to (1 /R)(f9This result shows that both the rate constant, ie, a measure of the intrinsic activity of the catalyst, and the effective diffusion coefficient, ie, a measure of the resistance to transport of the reactant offered by the pore stmcture, influence the rate. It is not appropriate to say that the reaction is diffusion controlled it depends on both the diffusion and the chemical kinetics. In contrast, as shown by equation 3, a reaction in solution can be diffusion controlled, depending on D but not on k. [Pg.172]

Because of the unique nature of electron-transfer reactions, these have been of great theoretical interest. More recently, research has centered on a microscopic picture of the electron-transfer reactions and predicting reaction rate constants (5,6). [Pg.65]

These equations hold if an Ignition Curve test consists of measuring conversion (X) as the unique function of temperature (T). This is done by a series of short, steady-state experiments at various temperature levels. Since this is done in a tubular, isothermal reactor at very low concentration of pollutant, the first order kinetic applies. In this case, results should be listed as pairs of corresponding X and T values. (The first order approximation was not needed in the previous ethylene oxide example, because reaction rates were measured directly as the total function of temperature, whereas all other concentrations changed with the temperature.) The example is from Appendix A, in Berty (1997). In the Ignition Curve measurement a graph is made to plot the temperature needed for the conversion achieved. [Pg.105]

The Chapman-Jongnet (CJ) theory is a one-dimensional model that treats the detonation shock wave as a discontinnity with infinite reaction rate. The conservation equations for mass, momentum, and energy across the one-dimensional wave gives a unique solution for the detonation velocity (CJ velocity) and the state of combustion products immediately behind the detonation wave. Based on the CJ theory it is possible to calculate detonation velocity, detonation pressure, etc. if the gas mixtnre composition is known. The CJ theory does not require any information about the chemical reaction rate (i.e., chemical kinetics). [Pg.67]

Measurements of overall reaction rates (of product formation or of reactant consumption) do not necessarily provide sufficient information to describe completely and unambiguously the kinetics of the constituent steps of a composite rate process. A nucleation and growth reaction, for example, is composed of the interlinked but distinct and different changes which lead to the initial generation and to the subsequent advance of the reaction interface. Quantitative kinetic analysis of yield—time data does not always lead to a unique reaction model but, in favourable systems, the rate parameters, considered with reference to quantitative microscopic measurements, can be identified with specific nucleation and growth steps. Microscopic examinations provide positive evidence for interpretation of shapes of fractional decomposition (a)—time curves. In reactions of solids, it is often convenient to consider separately the geometry of interface development and the chemical changes which occur within that zone of locally enhanced reactivity. [Pg.17]

Basu and Searcy [736] have applied the torsion—effusion and torsion— Langmuir techniques, referred to above for calcite decomposition [121], to the comparable reaction of BaC03, which had not been studied previously. The reaction rate at the (001) faces of single crystals was constant up to a product layer thickness of 1 mm. The magnitude of E (225.9 kJ mole-1) was appreciably less than the enthalpy of the reaction (252.1 kJ mole-1). This observation, unique for carbonates, led to the conclusion that the slowest step in BaC03 vacuum decomposition at 1160—1210 K is diffusion of one of the reaction components in a condensed phase or a surface reaction of C02 prior to desorption. [Pg.171]

To avoid the ambiguity associated with several ways of reporting a reaction rate, we can report a single unique average rate of a reaction without specifying the species. The unique average rate of the reaction a A + b > r C + d D is any of the following four equal quantities ... [Pg.651]

Division by the stoichiometric coefficients takes care of the stoichiometric relations between the reactants and products. There is no need to specify the species when reporting the unique average reaction rate, because the value of the rate is the same for each species. However, the unique average rate does depend on the coefficients used in the balanced equation, and so the chemical equation should be specified when reporting the unique rate. [Pg.651]

The average rate of a reaction is the change in concentration of a species divided by the time over which the change takes place the unique average rate is the average rate divided by the stoichiometric coefficient of the species monitored. Spectroscopic techniques are widely used to study reaction rates, particularly for fast reactions. [Pg.652]

All rates are unique reaction rates unless otherwise stated. Reaction Rates... [Pg.691]

All unique average rates are reported as positive quantities. See also average reaction rate. unit See base units. [Pg.970]

Unique average rate for a A + b B Unique average reaction rate =... [Pg.1044]

Reaction rates proceed according to the following trend secondary alcohols oxidize faster than primary, which oxidize much faster than methanol, which is unique. Methanol is slowly oxidized, presumably because it complexes strongly with the active Ti site. Moreover, methanol acts as a co-catalyst, increasing the rates of alkene4,37 and alkane51 oxidations. Thus methanol is a... [Pg.234]

The reaction rate is properly defined in terms of the time derivative of the extent of reaction. It is necessary to define k in a similar fashion in order to ensure uniqueness. Definitions in terms of the various rt would lead to rate constants that would differ by ratios of their stoichiometric coefficients. [Pg.27]

In accord with general Eyring TS theory, we may consider every elementary chemical reaction to be associated with a unique A- B supramolecular complex that dictates the reaction rate. In the present section we examine representative TS complexes from two well-known classes of chemical reactions Sn2 nucleophilic displacement reactions... [Pg.680]

Ionic liquids represent a unique class of reaction media for catalytic processes, and their application in catalysis has entered a period of exploding growth. The number of catalytic reactions involving ionic liquids continues to increase rapidly. These liquids offer promising solutions to the problems associated with conventional organic solvents the potential advantages may include enhanced reaction rates, improved chemo- and regioselectivities, and facile separation of products and catalyst recovery. [Pg.156]


See other pages where Unique reaction rate is mentioned: [Pg.7]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.941]    [Pg.964]    [Pg.964]    [Pg.970]    [Pg.1039]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.677]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.351]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.597 ]




SEARCH



UniQuant

Unique

Uniqueness

© 2024 chempedia.info