Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction efficiency improvement

Enhanced Efficiency Since 1 Faraday = 96,500 coulombs, for one mole of substrate in a one-electron per molecule reaction, one amp must be passed for 96,500 seconds, and that is if all electrons go toward the desired reaction Efficiency improvements are particularly desirable. [Pg.212]

A series of graft polymers on polychloroprene were made with isobutjiene, /-butyl vinyl ether, and a-methylstyrene by cationic polymerization in solution. The efficiency of the grafting reaction was improved by use of a proton trap, eg, 2,6-di-/-butylpyridine (68). [Pg.540]

Phenol-formaldehyde reactions catalyzed by zinc acetate as opposed to strong acids have been investigated, but this results in lower yields and requires longer reaction times. The reported ortho-ortho content yield was as high as 97%. Several divalent metal species such as Ca, Ba, Sr, Mg, Zn, Co, and Pb combined with an organic acid (such as sulfonic and/or fluoroboric acid) improved the reaction efficiencies.14 The importance of an acid catalyst was attributed to facilitated decomposition of any dibenzyl ether groups formed in the process. It was also found that reaction rates could be accelerated with continuous azeotropic removal of water. [Pg.380]

Several extraction techniques have also been described that use enzymatic or chemical reactions to improve extraction efficiency. A technique that has been used to increase the overall recovery of the marker residue is enzymatic hydrolysis to convert specific phase II metabolites (glucuronides or sulfates) back into the parent residue. Cooper etal used a glucuronidase to increase 10-fold the concentration of chloramphenicol residues in incurred tissue. As an example of a chemical reaction, Moghaddam et al. used Raney nickel to reduce thioether bonds between benomyl and polar cellular components, and as a result achieved a substantially improved recovery over conventional solvent extraction. In choosing to use either of these approaches, thorough characterization of the metabolism in the tissue sample must be available. [Pg.306]

It is now clear that pure pheromones can be synthesized in quantity. The problem is how to prepare them simply and efficiently. New synthetic methodologies are always welcome to improve the existing syntheses. Organoborane reactions and organotransition metal chemistry contributed much to improve the efficiency of carbon-carbon bond formation, while asymmetric epoxidations and dihydroxylations as well as enzymatic reactions greatly improved the enantiomeric purity of synthetic pheromones. [Pg.51]

The resulting device has demonstrated both FDG and FLT labelling at yields of 98% and 90%, respectively, in 100 s compared to typical macro-scale labelling of 65% in 45 min for FDG and 30% in 90 min for FLT. The use of acetonitrile, DMSO and HC1 have shown no degrading effect on the system. Extremely efficient labelling illustrates the effectiveness of flow-based micro-reactors for PET biomarker synthesis. Multiple biomarkers can be produced in 1-2 min, while using only micro-litres of precursor and can revolutionise the production of radiotracers. Small reaction volumes, improved yields, and the ability to synthesise small quantities of a variety of new compounds will allow preclinical and clinical evaluation of new PET agents with potential for clinical utilisation. [Pg.53]

We later determined that with lower catalyst loadings (15 mol% 2), reaction efficiency suffers (<50% conversion). When Ru complex lb was used (20 mol%, benzene, 80°C), 5-10% dimer derived from reaction of the terminal olefins was formed as the only product. Continued investigation of the catalytic macrocycli-zation indicated that, with freshly prepared and recrystallized Mo catalyst, the metathesis process occurs smoothly at 22 °C to afford 2 in 90% isolated yield after only 4 h. With 40 mol% 2, the yield improved to 97%, and less than 20 mol% catalyst gave notably lower conversions and yields. [Pg.136]

High-surface-area inorganic materials with ordered mesoporous structures have also been oT major interest Tor numerous applications including photocatalysis [99-102], The ultra-high-surface-area of mesoporous materials is appealing in applications of heterogeneous photocatalysis where it is desirable to minimize the distance between the site of photon absorption and electron-hole redox reactions to improve efficiency [103-105],... [Pg.436]

FIGURE 2.11 Structures and nomenclature of compounds that serve as auxiliary nucleophiles. Generation of activated esters. Substituted hydroxamic acids are sometimes added to carbodi-imides or other reactions to improve the efficiency of couplings. The additive suppresses side reactions by converting activated species into activated esters (see Section 2.10) before they have time to undergo secondary reactions, p(Me2SO) HOBt 9.30, HOAt 8.70. [Pg.40]

Whereas the majority of reactions of acetic anhydride with wood are thermally assisted, there has been some interest in using other methods for delivering energy. Larsson Brelid (2002), Larsson Brelid and Simonson (1999) and Larsson Brelid etal. (1999) studied the use of microwave heating to acetylate wood in order to reduce reaction times, improve the distribution of bonded reagent within the wood and achieve more efficient removal of process chemicals and by-products. [Pg.50]

An intrinsic, exothermic water-gas shift reaction occurs in the steam reformer reactor. The combined reaction, steam reforming and water gas shift, is endothermic. As such, an indirect high temperature heat source is needed to operate the reactor. This heat source usually takes the shape of an immediately adjacent high temperature furnace that combusts a small portion of the raw fuel or the fuel effluent from the fuel cell. Efficiency improves by using rejected heat from other parts of the system. Note that the intrinsic water-gas shift in the reactor may not lower the... [Pg.208]

In this way, the authors have proven several significant advantages of the reactions performed in a microreactor shorter reaction times, improved atom efficiency, excellent product yields and purities, efficient catalyst recycling and the increased safety of the reaction, thanks to the closed system which prevents the release of the cyanide. [Pg.179]

The next attempt to further improve the reaction efficiency was to reduce the volume of the acetic acid solvent and to proportionally increase the initial concentration of the alcohol substrate while keeping the total reaction volume at constant level. The main purpose of these studies was to determine the minimum amount acetic acid needed to maintain a homogeneous system until complete conversion of hexan-l-ol to 2. Since the oxidation reaction produces stoichiometric amounts water, it was felt, that the formation of a second aqueous phase along with the hydrophobic aldehyde phase would lead to the creation of a two-phase reaction system with the inevitable partition of the catalyst system between the two phases. In addition it was also important to determine the highest possible S/C ratio while maintaining a reasonable reaction rate. [Pg.126]

The presentations in this book have provided material that will enable the better-informed selection of solvents. This selection will in turn lead to the selection of chemicals that will have reduced hazardous properties, can lead to reduced waste generation, improved product selectivity and reaction efficiency, and more prudent use of quantities. [Pg.275]


See other pages where Reaction efficiency improvement is mentioned: [Pg.546]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.505]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.64]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



Reaction efficiency

© 2024 chempedia.info