Quasi-equilibrium rate equation

Using the simplified quasi-equilibrium rate equation (Section IIF) and a thermochemical argument, Bentley et al. (1969) showed that ZylZff) correlations for fragmentation processes may be solely due to the correlation of ionization potentials with a (see also Ward et al., 1969). The treatment was applied to simple cleavage processes where the substituent was lost in the neutral fragment and the appearance... 

This review is structured as follows. In the next section we present the theory for adsorbates that remain in quasi-equilibrium throughout the desorption process, in which case a few macroscopic variables, namely the partial coverages 0, and their rate equations are needed. We introduce the lattice gas model and discuss results ranging from non-interacting adsorbates to systems with multiple interactions, treated essentially exactly with the transfer matrix method, in Sec. II. Examples of the accuracy possible in the modehng of experimental data using this theory, from our own work, are presented for such diverse systems as multilayers of alkali metals on metals, competitive desorption of tellurium from tungsten, and dissociative... 

In this approximation we assume that one elementary step determines the rate while all other steps are sufficiently fast that they can be considered as being in quasi-equilibrium. If we take the surface reaction to AB (step 3, Eq. 134) as the rate-determining step (RDS), we may write the rate equations for steps (1), (2) and (4) as ... 

In cases where more than one step has a slow rate, we vdll have to consider the rate for both of these steps. Suppose, for example, that steps (1) and (3) in the scheme of Eqs. (132-135) possess slow rates, whereas steps (2) and (4) may be considered at quasi-equilibrium, we would have the following set of equations ... 

We will list the elementary steps and decide which is rate-limiting and which are in quasi-equilibrium. For ammonia synthesis a consensus exists that the dissociation of N2 is the rate-limiting step, and we shall make this assumption here. With quasi-equilibrium steps the differential equation, together with equilibrium condition, leads to an expression for the coverage of species involved in terms of the partial pressures of reactants, equilibrium constants and the coverage of other intermediates. 

Gomez-Sainero et al. (11) reported X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results on their Pd/C catalysts prepared by an incipient wetness method. XPS showed that Pd° (metallic) and Pdn+ (electron-deficient) species are present on the catalyst surface and the properties depend on the reduction temperature and nature of the palladium precursor. With this understanding of the dual sites nature of Pd, it is believed that organic species S and A are chemisorbed on to Pdn+ (SI) and H2 is chemisorbed dissociatively on to Pd°(S2) in a noncompetitive manner. In the catalytic cycle, quasi-equilibrium ( ) was assumed for adsorption of reactants, SM and hydrogen in liquid phase and the product A (12). Applying Horiuti s concept of rate determining step (13,14), the surface reaction between the adsorbed SM on site SI and adsorbed hydrogen on S2 is the key step in the rate equation. 

However, if reaction 3 is rate limiting we can deduce something useful and we will illustrate the quasi-equilibrium method by using it to derive the kinetic equation under these conditions. This method assumes that all reactions prior to the rate limiting step are in equilibrium. Thus, for reaction 1 ... 

The point at which the straight line of (tph) versus Eintersects the coordinate of electrode potential represents the flat band potential. Equation 10-15 holds when the reaction rate at the electrode interface is much greater than the rate of the formation of photoexcited electron-liole pairs here, the interfadal reaction is in the state of quasi-equilibrium and the interfadal overvoltage t)j, is dose to zero. 

The derivation of initial velocity equations invariably entails certain assumptions. In fact, these assumptions are often conditions that must be fulfilled for the equations to be valid. Initial velocity is defined as the reaction rate at the early phase of enzymic catalysis during which the formation of product is linear with respect to time. This linear phase is achieved when the enzyme and substrate intermediates reach a steady state or quasi-equilibrium. Other assumptions basic to the derivation of initial rate equations are as follows ... 

THE RAPID-EQUILIBRIUM TREATMENT. The first rate equation for an enzyme-catalyzed reaction was derived by Henri and by Michaelis and Menten, based on the rapid-equilibrium concept. With this treatment it is assumed that there is a slow catalytic conversion step and the combination and dissociation of enzyme and substrate are relatively fast, such that they reach a state of quasi-equilibrium or rapid equilibrium. 

If quasi-equilibrium corresponding to pinch-off has been reached at a given temperature, and the temperature is then lowered, no further adsorption will occur. The rate of adsorption, as given by Equation (6), will decrease as the temperature is lowered, at a constant value for E2. No desorption will occur, obviously, since the sample has less than an equilibrium amount of gas adsorbed. 

The other steps in the mechanism are assumed to be in quasi-equilibrium because of their much higher rate then step 3. Therefore, the following equation is valid for steps 1,2,4 and 5 ... 

By using the quasi-equilibrium equations of steps 1, 2, 4 and 5, it is possible to eliminate the unknown 0 parameters in the rate equation (6.15).The surface coverage of S( )2 can be eliminated by using step 2 ... 

The general rule for writing the rate equation according to the quasi-equilibrium treatment of enzyme kinetics can be exemplified for the random bisubstrate reaction with substrates A and B forming products P and Q (Figure 7.1), where KaKab = KbKba and KpKpq = KqKqp. 

The steady-state treatment of enzyme kinetics assumes that concentrations of the enzyme-containing intermediates remain constant during the period over which an initial velocity of the reaction is measured. Thus, the rates of changes in the concentrations of the enzyme-containing species equal zero. Under the same experimental conditions (i.e., [S]0 [E]0 and the velocity is measured during the very early stage of the reaction), the rate equation for one substrate reaction (uni uni reaction), if expressed in kinetic parameters (V and Ks), has the form identical to the Michaelis-Menten equation. However, it is important to note the differences in the Michaelis constant that is, Ks = k2/k1 for the quasi-equilibrium treatment whereas Ks = (k2 + k3)/k i for the steady-state treatment. 

For multisubstrate enzymatic reactions, the rate equation can be expressed with respect to each substrate as an m function, where n and m are the highest order of the substrate for the numerator and denominator terms respectively (Bardsley and Childs, 1975). Thus the forward rate equation for the random bi bi derived according to the quasi-equilibrium assumption is a 1 1 function in both A and B (i.e., first order in both A and B). However, the rate equation for the random bi bi based on the steady-state assumption yields a 2 2 function (i.e., second order in both A and B). The 2 2 function rate equation results in nonlinear kinetics that should be differentiated from other nonlinear kinetics such as allosteric/cooperative kinetics (Chapter 6, Bardsley and Waight, 1978) and formation of the abortive substrate complex (Dalziel and Dickinson, 1966 Tsai, 1978). 

The inequality in this equation is for irreversible reactions that occur spontaneously, while the equality is for reversible reactions in quasi-equilibrium. The inequality equation 4.1 is in fact the most important property of the affinity showing that the affinity always has the same sign as that of the rate of reaction at any instance during the reaction. 

It is evident that a knowledge of f° (rate of adsorption) and 0 (heat flow) is not enough to derive a continuous curve of differential enthalpy of adsorption. One must also know the dead volume Vc of the calorimetric cell proper and the derivative of the quasi-equilibrium pressure with time. Note that when this derivative is very small (i.e. in the nearly vertical parts of an adsorption isotherm), Equation 2.82 becomes simply ... 

The latter theory was first suggested by Becker and Doering (B2), who applied a quasi-equilibrium treatment and developed the following equation for the nucleation rate of condensing vapors ... 

In each, the forward reaction must outweigh the reverse reaction by what amounts to the net conversion of the overall reaction. This precludes ideal equilibrium, in which forward and reverse rates are exactly equal. However, if a step is very fast in both directions, its forward and reverse rates differ very little on a relative basis, and so can be equated in good approximation. This situation is illustrated in Figure 4.2 for a four-step reaction with rate control by a slow, second step. For precision s sake, the fast steps are said to be in quasi-equilibrium (see also next section). 

The postulate of quasi-equilibrium of all steps except a single one that controls the rate is very powerful. It reduces the mathematical complexity of kinetics even of large networks to quite simple rate equations and has become a favorite tool, employed today in a great majority of publications on kinetics of multistep homogeneous reactions, sometimes uncritically. In many cases, a sharp distinction between fast and slow steps cannot be justified. A more general approach that avoids the postulate of a single rate-controlling step and contains the results obtained with it as special cases will be described in Sections 4.3 and 6.3 and widely used in later Chapters. 

As discussed in the preceding section and illustrated in Figure 4.2, even a very fast step cannot attain ideal equilibrium as long as the overall reaction proceeds. The term quasi-equilibrium indicates that the forward and reverse rates of the step differ very little on a relative basis, so that the use of the equilibrium condition equating these rates is justified as an approximation. 

The three principal tools for reduction of mathematical complexity of rate equations are the concepts of a rate-controlling step, of quasi-equilibrium steps, and of quasi-stationary states of trace-level intermediates. 

If one or several steps in a pathway or network are much faster than all others, they attain quasi-equilibrium, and their (algebraic) equilibrium conditions can be used to replace rate equations. 

In a number of reactions of practical interest, the offending non-simple step is a reversible dissociation of a reactant or intermediate, as in Case V in Table 6.1. Often, such a step is fast compared with the others and thus is at quasi-equilibrium. If so, the quasi-equilibrium approximation (see Section 4.2) can greatly simplify mathematics, in some instances even lead to an explicit rate equation. This has been discussed in Section 5.6. 

Many reactions of practical interest have non-simple pathways or networks, i.e., the concentration of an intermediate rises above trace level or a (forward or reverse) step involves two or more molecules of intermediates as reactants. If the majority of the steps meet the simplicity conditions, a significant reduction in mathematical complexity can still be achieved by cutting the network into piecewise simple portions at the offending steps. In some other instances, the quasi-equilibrium or long-chain approximations can be invoked in order to obtain explicit rate equations although the network is non-simple. On the other hand, if a majority of steps in a network are non-simple, the tools described here are of little use. 

Like eqns 7.26 and 7.27, this equation reduces to the required form if the first denominator term is negligible. Like pathway II, pathway IV incorporates the mechanistically probable rearrangement from a 7r-complex to a a-bonded species, but it avoids the need to assume quasi-equilibrium between aldehyde and catalyst. (Note that by Rule 7.24, pathways III and IV have the same rate behavior.)... 

Equation 8.23 is the most general rate equation for a trace-level catalyst cycle A <— P with one intermediate. It reduces to the Briggs-Haldane equation 8.21 if fcPX - 0 or CP = 0, that is, if the second step is irreversible or only the initial rate is considered. It reduces further to the Michaelis-Menten equation 8.18 if, in addition, kxr A xa, that is, if the first step is in quasi-equilibrium. 

This equation contains the rate coefficients of all steps including those at quasi-equilibrium. Instead, the rate can be expressed in terms of the more easily accessible equilibrium constants of those steps ... 

If the forward and reverse X coefficients of a step are much larger than all others, that step is at quasi-equilibrium (see Section 4.2). The participants in that step then are present at all times in concentrations related to one another by the thermodynamic equilibrium condition, and so can be lumped into one pseudo-component. Since the number of denominator terms in the rate equation equals the square of the number of the cycle members, this reduces the amount of algebra considerably. 

If X6 is not a lacs, but X is zero, the last matrix row contributes one single term bi i2 23 34 45 caiCHcNCtPN with the same concentration co-factors as that in the fifth row, so that eqn 8.53 remains valid with only a different significance of fcd.J The first two steps of the cycle are likely to be at quasi-equilibrium. If so, the first denominator term in eqn 8.53 is negligible. The rate equation in one-plus form then has only three phenomenological coefficients. In any event, the reaction orders are plus one for nickel, between zero and plus one for HCN and 4-pentenenitrile, and between zero and minus two for the organic phosphine. 

The traditional way of handling this kind of hydrocyanation networks has been to postulate rate control by carbon-carbon coupling (X4 — X5) and quasi-equilibrium in all other steps. On this basis a simpler rate equation has been proposed [44] ... 

In more recent work on hydrogenation of butadiene polymers and copolymers, the attempt was made to explain the dependence on hydrogen pressure with sole rate control by olefin addition to H2RhClPh2 (X3) and quasi-equilibrium rhodium distribution over the complexes with and without hydrogen [59] instead of kinetic significance of the step Xq + H2 — X3. This gives a rate equation for double-bond disappearance of the form... 

---