Quantum principle

The postulates of quantum mechanics discussed in Section 3.7 are incomplete. In order to explain certain experimental observations, Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit introduced the concept of spin angular momentum for the electron. This concept is not contained in our previous set of postulates an additional postulate is needed. Further, there is no reason why the property of spin should be confined to the electron. As it turns out, other particles possess an intrinsic angular momentum as well. Accordingly, we now add a sixth postulate to the previous list of quantum principles. 

It is true that the idea of resonance energy was. . . provided by quantum mechanics,. . . but the theory of resonance in chemistry has gone far beyond the region of application in which any precise quantum mechanical calculations have been made, and its great extension has been almost entirely empirical, with only the valuable and effective guidance of fundamental quantum principles. 84... 

Let us revisit the helium core, for this is the heart of the matter. As a result of the relentless contraction, the density continues to increase, and with it the temperature, but at a slower rate now. When the central temperature reaches 100 million K, the density is 10000 times greater than the density of water. Subject to an imperious quantum principle that forbids them any freedom to overlap one another, the electrons make a final stand against compression and confusion. Eor this reason, they assume an increasing contribution to the pressure. 

For a review of the status of the and Hj problems prior to the new quantum mechanics see Van Vleck, Quantum Principles and Line Spectra, p. 88. Also dis-cussion by Kemble in last chapter of National Research Council Report on Molecular Spectra in Gases. ... 

Eucken discovered that the molecular heat of hydrogen falls at low temperatures from 5 to 3. This and other variations in specific heats with temperature can only be interpreted in terms of quantum dynamics, and the subjection of mechanical processes taking place among gas molecules to quantum principles must be taken into consideration in theories of chemical reaction mechanisms. 

I see the quantum principle, as stated in physics, as particular manifestation of a more general principle that various components of the universe have a "shape" or "structure" or "energy configuration."... 

This process constitutes a kind of quantum jump, albeit not the neat quantum jump of an electron from one discrete energy state to another in an atom, we are dealing with highly composite, complex structures, and even when such structures are made up of units that operate on quantum principles, the aggregate may show various degrees of continuity. Recall the earlier discussion of individual differences. For certain individuals, the transition from a b-SoC to a d-ASC definitely shows a quantum jump, with no consciousness during the transition period. The system properties of the d-ASC are quite different from those of the b-SoC. 

This kind of clustering in the plot of an individual s locations at various times in experiential space is what I mean by discrete states of consciousness. Put another way, it means that you can be in a certain region of experiential space and show some degree of movement or variation within that space, but to transit out of that space you have to cross a "forbidden zone" [11 where you cannot function and/or cannot have experiences and/or cannot be conscious of having experiences then you find yourself in a discretely different experiential space. It is the quantum principle of physics applied to psychology (see Chapter 18). You can be either here or there, but not in between. 

I see the quantum principle, as stated in physics, as particular manifestation of a more general principle that various components of the universe have a "shape" or "structure" or "energy configuration." On a familiar, macroscopic level, for example, water can be in three distinct states, a solid (ice), a liquid (ordinary water), or a gas (steam). There can be mechanical mixtures of the three states, as of water droplets falling or floating in the air, but the solid, liquid, and gas states are quite distinct. 

An eavesdropper could also try to amplify the signal and split off its part, however, cloning of quantum states is also forbidden by quantum principles... 

This paper reviews this classical S-matrix theory, i.e. the semiclassical theory of inelastic and reactive scattering which combines exact classical mechanics (i.e. numerically computed trajectories) with the quantum principle of superposition. It is always possible, and in some applications may even be desirable, to apply the basic semiclassical model with approximate dynamics Cross7 has discussed the simplifications that result in classical S-matrix theory if one treats the dynamics within the sudden approximation, for example, and shown how this relates to some of his earlier work8 on inelastic scattering. For the most part, however, this review will emphasize the use of exact classical dynamics and avoid discussion of various dynamical models and approximations, the reason being to focus on the nature and validity of the basic semiclassical idea itself, i.e., classical dynamics plus quantum superposition. Actually, all quantum effects—being a direct result of the superposition of probability amplitudes—are contained (at least qualitatively) within the semiclassical model, and the primary question to be answered regards the quantitative accuracy of the description. 

The basic semiclassical idea is that one uses a quantum mechanical description of the process of interest but then invokes classical mechanics to determine all dynamical relationships. A transition from initial state i to final state f, for example, is thus described by a transition amplitude, or S-matrix element Sfi, the square modulus of which is the transition probability Pf = Sfi 2. The semiclassical approach uses classical mechanics to construct the classical-limit approximation for the transition amplitude, i.e. the classical S-matrix the fact that classical mechanics is used to construct an amplitude means that the quantum principle of superposition is incorporated in the description, and this is the only element of quantum mechanics in the model. The completely classical approach would be to use classical mechanics to construct the transition probability directly, never alluding to an amplitude. 

Classical complex formation such as outlined above has been observed in a number of classical Monte Carlo trajectory studies,45 and Brumer and Karplus46 have recently reported an extensive study of alkali halide-alkali halide reactions which involve long-lived collision complexes. These purely classical studies cannot, of course, describe the resonance structure in the energy dependence of scattering properties, but rather give an average energy dependence the resonance structure, a quantum effect, is described only by a theory which contains the quantum principle of superposition. 

The interference of all symmetrically related trajectories, i.e. the quantum principle of superposition, thus leads to the Bragg diffraction law which allows only certain discrete changes in the x and y components of momentum. The S-matrix element S°, which is constructed from those trajectories with initial values x, and y, restricted to one cell, is the S-matrix on the diffraction spot shell . 

One has at hand, therefore, a completely general semiclassical mechanics which allows one to construct the classical-limit approximation to any quantum mechanical quantity, incorporating the complete classical dynamics with the quantum principle of superposition. As has been emphasized, and illustrated by a number of examples in this review, all quantum effects— interference, tunnelling, resonances, selection rules, diffraction laws, even quantization itself—arise from the superposition of probability amplitudes and are thus contained at least qualitatively within the semiclassical description. The semiclassical picture thus affords a broad understanding and clear insight into the nature of quantum effects in molecular dynamics. 

Understanding mass spectrometry-since this technique does not involve the production and measurement of electromagnetic spectra and is not based on quantum principles, it should not really be referred to as a spectroscopic technique. 

The quantum principle in physics states that because of the nature of certain physical systems, most obviously that of the... 

Taking into account the quantum principle of uncertainty, it is worthwhile to employ an applicability criterion A of classical theory ... 

---