Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Quantum mechanics level

The microscopic origin of x and hence of Pis the non-unifonnity of the charge distribution in the medium. To lowest order this is given by the dipole moment, which in turn can be related to the dipole moments of the component molecules in the sample. Thus, on a microscopic quantum mechanical level we have the relation... [Pg.225]

As discussed in section A 1.6.1. on a microscopic quantum mechanical level, within the dipole approximation, the polarization, P(t), is given by... [Pg.254]

Atomic-scale devices already projected pose design challenges at tlie quantum mechanical level. The framework of quantum computing is now being discussed in research laboratories [48, 49]. [Pg.2896]

The Car-Parrinello quantum molecular dynamics technique, introduced by Car and Parrinello in 1985 [1], has been applied to a variety of problems, mainly in physics. The apparent efficiency of the technique, and the fact that it combines a description at the quantum mechanical level with explicit molecular dynamics, suggests that this technique might be ideally suited to study chemical reactions. The bond breaking and formation phenomena characteristic of chemical reactions require a quantum mechanical description, and these phenomena inherently involve molecular dynamics. In 1994 it was shown for the first time that this technique may indeed be applied efficiently to the study of, in that particular application catalytic, chemical reactions [2]. We will discuss the results from this and related studies we have performed. [Pg.433]

Simulation of molecules can be done at the quantum mechanical level, as is necessaiy to determine the electronic properties of molecules, to analyze covalent bonds or simulate bond formation and breaking. However, quantum mechanical simulation is extremely computationally intensive and is too time-consuming for all but the smallest molecular systems. [Pg.812]

Some pessimism in assessing the situation in the field of electrocatalysis may also derive from the fact that one of the final aims of work in this held, setting up a full theory of electrocatalysis at a quantum-mechanical level while accounhng for all interactions of the reacting species with each other and with the catalyst surface, is still very far from being reahzed. So far we do not even have a semiempirical— if sufficiently general—theory with which we could predict the catalytic activity of various catalysts. [Pg.553]

Ab initio atomic simulations are computationally demanding present day computers and theoretical methods allow simulations at the quantum mechanical level of hundreds of atoms. Since an electrochemical cell contains an astronomical number of atoms, however, simplifications are essential. It is therefore obvious that it is necessary to study the half-cell reactions one by one. This, in turn, implies that a reference electrode with a known fixed potential is needed. For this purpose, a theoretical counterpart to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) has been established [Nprskov et al., 2004]. We will describe this model in some detail below. [Pg.58]

Therefore, a theoretician aiming at the elucidation of biological processes by quantum-mechanical calculations faces two crucial issues. The first one is the selection of a fragment for modeling at the quantum-mechanical level. The second one is the assessment of the effects associated with parts of the system which cannot be modeled at the quantum-mechanical level. [Pg.85]

In 1973161, Rinaldi and Rivail proposed an approach that combines the quantum-mechanical level of description of chemical molecules with the macroscopic concept of the reaction field. A similar approach was introduced by Tapia and Goscinski in 1975162. [Pg.109]

At a quantum-mechanical level, there is a simple relationship that ties together the twin modes by which we visualize photons we say that the energy of a photon particle is E and the frequency of a light wave is v. The Planck-Einstein equation, Equation (9.3), says... [Pg.435]

The reason why the colour of MnC>4- is so intense follows from the unusual way in which the electron changes its position. There are no restrictions (on a quantum-mechanical level) to the photo-excitation of an electron, so the probability of excitation is high. In other words, a high proportion of the MnC>4- ions undergo this photoexcitation process. Conversely, if a photo-excited charge does not move spatially, then there are quantum-mechanic inhibitions, and the probability is lower. [Pg.461]

A well defined theory of chemical reactions is required before analyzing solvent effects on this special type of solute. The transition state theory has had an enormous influence in the development of modern chemistry [32-37]. Quantum mechanical theories that go beyond the classical statistical mechanics theory of absolute rate have been developed by several authors [36,38,39], However, there are still compelling motivations to formulate an alternate approach to the quantum theory that goes beyond a theory of reaction rates. In this paper, a particular theory of chemical reactions is elaborated. In this theoretical scheme, solvent effects at the thermodynamic and quantum mechanical level can be treated with a fair degree of generality. The theory can be related to modern versions of the Marcus theory of electron transfer [19,40,41] but there is no... [Pg.284]

In the absence of definitive information about the structure of the active site theoretical modeling of enzyme catalyzed reactions is difficult but not impossible. These difficulties are caused by the extremely large size of the enzyme-substrate-solvent system which typically comprises thousands or tens of thousands of atoms so that direct theoretical treatment at the microscopic quantum mechanical level is not yet practical. The computational demand is simply too enormous. As a compromise, a scheme generally referred to as QM/MM (quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics) has been devised. In QM/MM calculations, the bulk of the enzyme-solvent system (i.e. most of the atoms) is treated at a low cost, usually at the molecular mechanics (MM) level, while the more nearly correct and much more expensive quantum level (QM) computation is applied only to the reaction center (active site). [Pg.379]

In recent years, electrochemical charge transfer processes have received considerable theoretical attention at the quantum mechanical level. These quantal treatments are pivotal in understanding underlying processes of technological importance, such as electrode kinetics, electrocatalysis, corrosion, energy transduction, solar energy conversion, and electron transfer in biological systems. [Pg.71]

The Holstein-Primakoff transformation also preserves the commutation relations (70). Due to the square-root operators in Eqs. (78a)-(78d), however, the mutual adjointness of S+ and 5 as well as the self-adjointness of S3 is only guaranteed in the physical subspace 0),..., i- -m) of the transformation [219]. This flaw of the Holstein-Primakoff transformation outside the physical subspace does not present a problem on the quantum-mechanical level of description. This is because the physical subspace again is invariant under the action of any operator which results from the mapping (78) of an arbitrary spin operator A(5i, 2, 3). As has been discussed in Ref. 100, however, the square-root operators may cause serious problems in the semiclassical evaluation of the Holstein-Primakoff transformation. [Pg.304]

Although the classical mapping formulation yields the correct quantum-mechanical level density in the special case of a one-mode spin-boson model, the classical approximation deteriorates for mulhdimensional problems, since the classical oscillators may transfer their ZPE. As a hrst example. Fig. 21a compares Nc E) as obtained for Model I in the limiting cases y = 0 and 1 (thin solid lines) to the exact quantum-mechanical density N E) (thick line). The classical level density is seen to be either much higher (for y = 1) or much lower (for y = 0) than the quantum result. Since the integral level density can be... [Pg.314]

Figure 22 shows the same quantities for the intramolecular electron-transfer Model IVb. Similar to what occurs in the pyrazine model, the classical level density obtained with y = 1 overestimates the total and state-specific level density while for y = 0 the classical level densities are too small. Employing a ZPE correction of y = 0.8 results in a very good agreement with the total quantum mechanical level density, while the criterion to reproduce the state-specific level density results in a ZPE correction of y = 0.6. [Pg.316]

In the case of Model II, neither the state-specihc nor the total quantum-mechanical level densities are available. To determine the optimal value of the ZPE correction, therefore criterion (98) was applied, which yielded y = 0.6. The mapping results thus obtained (panels D and G) are seen to reproduce the quantum result almost quantitatively. It should be noted that this ZPE adjustment ensures that the adiabatic population probabilities remain within [0, 1] and at the same time also yields the best agreement with the quantum diabatic populations. [Pg.318]

We note that the integral over the energetically allowed phase space— that is, the classical level density (97)—was found in Fig. 20 to be in excellent agreement with the quantum-mechanical level density. This finding indicates that there is a valid correspondence between the quantum-mechanical two-state system and its classical mapping representation. A similar conclusion was drawn in a recent smdy of a mapped two-state problem, which focused on the Lyapunov exponents and the energy level statistics of the system [124, 235]. [Pg.328]

It is clear from the above that the continuum model can simulate only those aspects of the solvent which are somewhat independent from hydrophobicity, hydrophyUicity, generally the first solvation shell, and specific interactions with the solute. The physical problem is a general one namely, it relates to the validity to use quantities, correctly described and defined at the macroscopic level, in the discrete description of matter at the atomic level. For such study, one needs explicit consideration of the solvent, for example the molecules of water. This can be done either at the quantum-mechanical level, as in cluster computations. Another approach is to simulate the system at the molecular dynamics (or Monte Carlo) level these techniques allow us to consider... [Pg.285]

These contributions were taken explicitly to a quantum mechanical level by Levich during the 1960s and then by Schmickler, who finally published an elegant summary of quantum electrode kinetics in 1996. Schmickler stressed the quantum mechanical formulation made by Levich, Dogonadze, and Kuznetsov. However, his summary of the quantum mechanical formulation of electrode reactions still possesses the Achilles heel of earlier formulations it is restricted to nonbond-breaking, seldom-occurring outer-sphere reactions and involves the harmonic approximation for the energy variation, which is the main reason of such theories cannot replicate Tafel s law (Khan and Sidik, 1997). [Pg.806]

A closer relationship between EVB and QM/MM is apparent when some components of the matrix elements are computed on the fly at a quantum mechanical level. Mo and Gao (2000), for instance, have described such a technique in the absence of an MM region where an EVB Hamiltonian that includes QM-computed terms is coupled with a surrounding QM region in a non-SCF fashion. The extension of this melhodology to include an MM region follows naturally from the QM/MM couplings described above. [Pg.482]

Christopher J. Cramer and their co-workers during the last decade [61,100, 55, 56], In SMx, terms responsible for cavity foimation. dispersion, solvent structure and local field polarization are present [51,57], The solvation energy is obtained via the usual approximation that the solute, treated at the quantum mechanical level, is immersed in an isotropic polarizable continuum representing the solvent. Therefore the standard free energy of the solute in solution can be expressed as ... [Pg.192]

The MCSCF/CM response method provide procedures for obtaining frequency-dependent molecular properties when investigating a molecule coupled to a structured environment and the basis is achieved by treating the quantum mechanical subsystem on a quantum mechanical level and the structured environment as a classical subsystem described by a molecular mechanics force field. The important interactions between the two subsystems are included directly in the optimized wave function. [Pg.555]

The preference for the [3+2] mechanism does not provide in itself an explanation for the high enantioselectivity observed in these reactions. The theoretical studies undertaken to discern the mechanism were carried out at quantum mechanical level on a model achiral system. To consider the asym-... [Pg.132]

The two-layered ONIOM(B3LYP HF) method describing the whole system at quantum mechanical level, without the support of a molecular mechanics method, was employed by Landis and Uddin to explore the hydroformylation of 1-alkenes by a Rh-xantphos complex [119]. The authors state that their results dispel the assumption that only phosphine diequatorial isomers... [Pg.142]

Coherent population transfer Transfer of population from one quantum mechanical level to another using coherent radiation. The radiation may be provided by either continuous or pulsed lasers. Using the method of adiabatic passage (see STIRAP), 100% population transfer has been achieved. [Pg.145]

The theory for this intermolecular electron transfer reaction can be approached on a microscopic quantum mechanical level, as suggested above, based on a molecular orbital (filled and virtual) approach for both donor (solute) and acceptor (solvent) molecules. If the two sets of molecular orbitals can be in resonance and can physically overlap for a given cluster geometry, then the electron transfer is relatively efficient. In the cases discussed above, a barrier to electron transfer clearly exists, but the overall reaction in certainly exothermic. The barrier must be coupled to a nuclear motion and, thus, Franck-Condon factors for the electron transfer process must be small. This interaction should be modeled by Marcus inverted region electron transfer theory and is well described in the literature (Closs and Miller 1988 Kang et al. 1990 Kim and Hynes 1990a,b Marcus and Sutin 1985 McLendon 1988 Minaga et al. 1991 Sutin 1986). [Pg.187]

Extensive DFT and PP calculations have permitted the establishment of important trends in chemical bonding, stabilities of oxidation states, crystal-field and SO effects, complexing ability and other properties of the heaviest elements, as well as the role and magnitude of relativistic effects. It was shown that relativistic effects play a dominant role in the electronic structures of the elements of the 7 row and heavier, so that relativistic calculations in the region of the heaviest elements are indispensable. Straight-forward extrapolations of properties from lighter congeners may result in erroneous predictions. The molecular DFT calculations in combination with some physico-chemical models were successful in the application to systems and processes studied experimentally such as adsorption and extraction. For theoretical studies of adsorption processes on the quantum-mechanical level, embedded cluster calculations are under way. RECP were mostly applied to open-shell compounds at the end of the 6d series and the 7p series. Very accurate fully relativistic DFB ab initio methods were used for calculations of the electronic structures of model systems to study relativistic and correlation effects. These methods still need further development, as well as powerful supercomputers to be applied to heavy element systems in a routine manner. Presently, the RECP and DFT methods and their combination are the best way to study the theoretical chemistry of the heaviest elements. [Pg.86]


See other pages where Quantum mechanics level is mentioned: [Pg.393]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.702]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.156]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.225 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.225 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.235 ]




SEARCH



Quantum level

Quantum mechanics energy levels in the hydrogen atom

© 2024 chempedia.info