Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvent structure

Solvent Structure.—This is often reflected in kinetic parameters. Thus, the rate law for reaction of triphenylchlorosilane with isopropanol in carbon tetrachloride is of order 2-4 with respect to the isopropanol. This suggests that solvent polymers are reactive species in the rate-determining step. The dependence of the rate constants for formation of [Nibipy] + on solvent fluidity both emphasises the importance of solvent structure in [Pg.203]

It is only rarely possible to probe the composition or structure of secondary solvation shells. One situation where this is possible is [Cr(NCS)6] in solution in aqueous acetonitrile, described in Section 3 of Chapter 4. Control over solvent shell composition in mixed solvents is most readily achieved by the use of mixtures of co-ordinating and non-co-ordinating solvents. Examples of applications of this include the study of DMSO exchange at nickel(ii) in DMSO-nitromethane and DMSO-methylene chloride mixtures, and of aquo-ions in methylene chloride.  [Pg.204]

Solvent Structure. There has been some discussion of the importance of solvent structure in kinetics, for example in connection with aquation of cobalt(m) complexes in binary aqueous mixtures. There are difficulties in squaring the kinetic parameters for dimethylformamide and for dimethyl sulphoxide exchange at iron(u) with Bennetto and Caldin s model of solvent structural effects, but this model proved useful in discussion of the aquation of [Co(NH3)s(DMSO)] + in binary aqueous mixtures. Bulky hydrophobic groups in solvent molecules have an effect on solvent structure which is reflected in the kinetics of complex formation. - For dissociative solvent exchange at some M + ions, activation enthalpies appear to be determined by the solvation enthalpy of the metal ion and the solvent structure as manifested in its enthalpy of vaporization. In the reaction of Ni + with malonate, the range of solvent variation of activation parameters is comparable with their likely errors, preventing the authors from discussing their results in terms of Bennetto and Caldin s theories.  [Pg.283]

For certain binary aqueous solvent series, for example for monohydroxylic alcohol-water mixtures, many physical properties show extrema or discontinuities at certain compositions. These are often reflected in kinetic parameters. It is generally assumed that reactants or added acid do not have a significant effect on the positions [Pg.283]

Michaille and K. Kikindai, Inorg. Nuclear Chem. Letters, 1977,13, 543. [Pg.283]

Solvent Structure.— The role of solvent structure in determining rates of formation reactions of dipositive transition-metal cations with such ligands as bipy and terpy has been intensively investigated and discussed for mixed aqueous as well as for non-aqueous solvents (see above). Bennetto and Caldin s work on the reaction of nickel(n) with bipy in methanol-water mixtures was fully reviewed in Volume 2 of this Report (see pp. 201— 206 of that volume). As structure modification is more marked in t-butyl alcohol-water than in methanol-water mixtures, the reaction of nickel(n) with bipy has now been [Pg.323]

Although most of this work on the possible interrelations of solvent structure and reactivities has been concerned with formation at nickel(n), the influence of solvent structure on kinetics has also occasionally been discussed for substitution at other metal centres. A recent example is provided by a study of the kinetics of aquation of [Fe(phen)3] +, and of some of its ligand-substituted derivatives, in aqueous acetonitrile. The reactivity patterns here can be compared and contrasted with those for the same reactions in t-butyl alcohol-water mixtures and considered in relation to thermochemical and spectroscopic information on inter- and intra-component interactions in these mixed-solvent systems.  [Pg.324]

The importance of solvent structure in determining reactivity in the formation reaction of hexa-aquonickel(ii) with bipy has also been assessed for one wholly non-aqueous mixed-solvent system, that of acetonitrile-methanol.  [Pg.324]

Other common solvents have much lower relative permittivities  [Pg.519]

Non-polar liquids have relative permittivities of around 2 at 25°C such as  [Pg.519]

The range of permittivities can be extended by using mixed solvents. Many studies of the behaviour of electrolyte solutions have been carried out in mixed solvents. But it is important to realise that there may be preferential solvation by one of the solvents under these conditions, and this could affect the correctness or otherwise of the interpretations which can be made. [Pg.519]

Because SFG can discriminate molecules adsorbed at interfaces from those present in the bulk, it is an ideal technique to examine the organization of solvent molecules at the solid/liquid interface. [Pg.187]

Solvent structural factors seem to have little effect on activation parameters for aquation of [Co(DMSO)(NH3)5] + in ethanol-water mixtures, but are significant in polyphosphate hydrolysis (which is probably 5 n2) in dioxan-water and formic acid-water media. - Solvent structure is important in determining kinetic parameters for reaction of copper(n) with chlorophyllic acid in mixed non-aqueous media (see below). [Pg.268]


The reason for this enliancement is intuitively obvious once the two reactants have met, they temporarily are trapped in a connnon solvent shell and fomi a short-lived so-called encounter complex. During the lifetime of the encounter complex they can undergo multiple collisions, which give them a much bigger chance to react before they separate again, than in the gas phase. So this effect is due to the microscopic solvent structure in the vicinity of the reactant pair. Its description in the framework of equilibrium statistical mechanics requires the specification of an appropriate interaction potential. [Pg.835]

As is inversely proportional to solvent viscosity, in sufficiently viscous solvents the rate constant k becomes equal to k y. This concerns, for example, reactions such as isomerizations involving significant rotation around single or double bonds, or dissociations requiring separation of fragments, altiiough it may be difficult to experimentally distinguish between effects due to local solvent structure and solvent friction. [Pg.843]

Many additional refinements have been made, primarily to take into account more aspects of the microscopic solvent structure, within the framework of diffiision models of bimolecular chemical reactions that encompass also many-body and dynamic effects, such as, for example, treatments based on kinetic theory [35]. One should keep in mind, however, that in many cases die practical value of these advanced theoretical models for a quantitative analysis or prediction of reaction rate data in solution may be limited. [Pg.845]

The relation between the microscopic friction acting on a molecule during its motion in a solvent enviromnent and macroscopic bulk solvent viscosity is a key problem affecting the rates of many reactions in condensed phase. The sequence of steps leading from friction to diflfiision coefficient to viscosity is based on the general validity of the Stokes-Einstein relation and the concept of describing friction by hydrodynamic as opposed to microscopic models involving local solvent structure. In the hydrodynamic limit the effect of solvent friction on, for example, rotational relaxation times of a solute molecule is [ ]... [Pg.853]

The simple difhision model of the cage effect again can be improved by taking effects of the local solvent structure, i.e. hydrodynamic repulsion, into account in the same way as discussed above for bimolecular reactions. The consequence is that the potential of mean force tends to favour escape at larger distances > 1,5R) more than it enliances caging at small distances, leading to larger overall photodissociation quantum yields [H6, 117]. [Pg.862]

The analysis of recent measurements of the density dependence of has shown, however, that considering only the variation of solvent structure in the vicinity of the atom pair as a fiinction of density is entirely sufficient to understand tire observed changes in with pressure and also with size of the solvent molecules [38]. Assuming that iodine atoms colliding with a solvent molecule of the first solvation shell under an angle a less than (the value of is solvent dependent and has to be found by simulations) are reflected back onto each other in the solvent cage, is given by... [Pg.862]

Kovacs H, A E Mark and W F van Gunsteren 1997. Solvent Structure at a Hydrophobic Protein Surface. Proteins Structure, Function and Genetics 27 395-404. [Pg.576]

Solvent Structural formula Dielectric constant e Type of solvent Relative rate... [Pg.347]

For a substance to dissolve in a liquid, it must be capable of disrupting the solvent structure and permit the bonding of solvent molecules to the solute or its component ions. The forces binding the ions, atoms or molecules in the lattice oppose the tendency of a crystalline solid to enter solution. The solubility of a solid is thus determined by the resultant of these opposing effects. The solubility of a solute in a given solvent is defined as the concentration of that solute in its saturated solution. A saturated solution is one that is in equilibrium with excess solute present. The solution is still referred to as saturated, even... [Pg.59]

W. R. Fawcett. Molecular models for the solvent structure at polarizable interfaces. Israeli J Chem 75 3-16, 1979. [Pg.847]

Earlier analyses making use of AH vs. AS plots generated many p values in the experimentally accessible range, and at least some of these are probably artifacts resulting from the error correlation in this type of plot. Exner s treatment yields p values that may be positive or negative and that are often experimentally inaccessible. Some authors have associated isokinetic relationships and p values with specific chemical phenomena, particularly solvation effects and solvent structure, but skepticism seems justified in view of the treatments of Exner and Krug et al. At the present time an isokinetic relationship should not be claimed solely on the basis of a plot of AH vs. A5, but should be examined by the Exner or Krug methods. [Pg.371]

Similar observations hold for solubility. Predominandy ionic halides tend to dissolve in polar, coordinating solvents of high dielectric constant, the precise solubility being dictated by the balance between lattice energies and solvation energies of the ions, on the one hand, and on entropy changes involved in dissolution of the crystal lattice, solvation of the ions and modification of the solvent structure, on the other [AG(cryst->-saturated soln) = 0 = A/7 -TA5]. For a given cation (e.g. K, Ca +) solubility in water typically follows the sequence... [Pg.823]

Steadman, J., and Syage, J. A. (1991). Time-resolved studies of phenol proton transfer in clusters. 3. solvent structure and ion-pair formation. J. Phys. Chem. 95 10326-10331. [Pg.440]

This subroutine calculates the three radial distribution functions for the solvent. The radial distribution functions provide information on the solvent structure. Specially, the function g-AB(r) is die average number of type B atoms within a spherical shell at a radius r centered on an aibitaiy type A atom, divided by the number of type B atoms that one would expect to find in the shell based cm the hulk solvent density. [Pg.99]

The nonlocal diffuse-layer theory near Eam0 has been developed283 with a somewhat complicated function oLyjind of solvent structural parameters. At low concentrations,/ ) approaches unity, reaching the Gouy-Chapman Qatc- 0. At moderate concentrations, deviations from this law are described by the effective spatial correlation range A of the orientational polarization fluctuations of the solvent. [Pg.55]

The local solvent structural information inherent in deviations from Parsons-Zobel plots suggests that this effect deserves further experimental investigation.126,283 284 The reported accuracy of recent capacitance data (5%) for dilute solutions,285 however, must be improved before unambiguous conclusions about deviations can be drawn. [Pg.55]

In concentrated NaOH solutions, however, the deviations of the experimental data from the Parsons-Zobel plot are quite noticeable.72 These deviations can be used290 to find the derivative of the chemical potential of a single ion with respect to both the concentration of the given ion and the concentration of the ion of opposite sign. However, in concentrated electrolyte solutions, the deviations of the Parsons-Zobel plot can be caused by other effects,126 279"284 e.g., interferences between the solvent structure and the Debye length. Thus various effects may compensate each other for distances of molecular dimensions, and the Parsons-Zobel plot can appear more straight than it could be for an ideally flat interface. [Pg.56]

Guidelli and co-workers336-338 measured the potential of zero charge by chronocoulometry. They found that the pzc was independent of the electrolyte concentration in both NaC104 and Na2S04. However, Ea=0 in the presence of sulfates was ca. 40 mV more negative. These authors have explained this apparent discrepancy in terms of the perturbation of the solvent structure at the interface by the ions at the electrode surface, which are, however, nonspecifically adsorbed. [Pg.63]

Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) and differential capacitance methods have been used to study the interfacial solvent structure and... [Pg.68]

Considerable progress has been made in the last decade in the development of more analytical methods for studying the structural and thermodynamic properties of liquids. One particularly successful theoretical approach is. based on an Ornstein-Zernike type integral equation for determining the solvent structure of polar liquids as well as the solvation of solutes.Although the theory provides a powerful tool for elucidating the structure of liquids in... [Pg.100]


See other pages where Solvent structure is mentioned: [Pg.243]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.839]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.1283]    [Pg.1286]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.103]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.402 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.5 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.380 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.31 , Pg.32 , Pg.33 , Pg.34 , Pg.35 , Pg.36 , Pg.37 , Pg.38 , Pg.39 , Pg.40 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.9 , Pg.10 , Pg.507 , Pg.519 , Pg.520 , Pg.521 , Pg.522 , Pg.523 , Pg.524 , Pg.525 , Pg.526 , Pg.527 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.444 , Pg.445 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.132 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.411 , Pg.422 , Pg.423 , Pg.460 ]




SEARCH



Dimethyl sulfoxide solvent structure

Electron-transfer . nonadiabatic solvent structure

Formation and Solvent Structure

Formation of Hydrogen-Bonded Self-assembled Structures in Polar Solvents

Heat capacity solvents water, structural

Hierarchically structured solvent

Interaction Between Structure-Directing Agent, Solvent, and Silica Framework

Interface solvent structure

Limiting Unimolecular Nucleophilic Reactions—Effects of Structure and Solvent

Local solvent structure

Modified solvent structure

Non-structured solvents

Organic solvents molecular structures

Polymer structure modification solvents

Potentials of Mean Force and Solvent Structure

Protein structure solvent accessibility

Protein structure solvent effects

Pure solvent structure function and compressibility

Solvation and Solvent Structure

Solvent Dynamics and Structure

Solvent Effects on Enolate Structure and Reactivity

Solvent Modified Resin Structures

Solvent Properties and Structure of Imidazolium ILs

Solvent Structure around Ions

Solvent binding sites crystal structures

Solvent components, structural changes

Solvent effects, static structures

Solvent fractions, structural characterization

Solvent reaction, structural change

Solvent structure near surfaces

Solvent structure representation

Solvent structure, phospholipid monolayers

Solvent-extraction chelating extractants, structural

Solvents metal-organic structures

Solvents reaction kinetics, structure effect

Solvents structure, reactivity

Solvents structured domains

Structural and Solvent Effects in SN Reactions

Structural changes in the solvent

Structure deformations, solute-solvent

Structure deformations, solute-solvent interaction

Structure of Nonionic Surfactant Micelles in Organic Solvents A SAXS Study

Structure of the Most Common Solvent, Water

Structure solvent effect

Structuring of solvent

Tetrahydrofuran solvent structure

The solvent structure

Transition structure solvent effects

© 2024 chempedia.info