Tests quality assurance

Some tolled products can be reworked if they fail quality assurance tests. In these cases the production cost may go up, but the product is not a complete loss. However, other tolled products, some pharmaceuticals for example, could be completely ruined by similar processing mishaps. Losses in these cases can be quite extensive. Test runs and approved rework procedures for such products may help avoid these losses. 

A. Crowson, R.W. Hdey and C.C. Todd, Quality assurance testing of an explosive trace analysis laboratory , J. Forensic Sci., 46 (2001) 53—56. 

Once the logic tree structure appears to be consistent, the first of three quality assurance tests is applied by examining the overall logic tree structure for completeness. The logic in each branch of the tree should be tested to determine if it is necessary and sufficient. (Details and tips for testing the logic are discussed in Section 9.6.2.) If the tree appears to be complete, the next quality assurance test is initiated. If the tree is incomplete, then the fact or logic problem is identified and the entire process is repeated. This is called an iterative loop. ... 

Quality assurance tests should be applied to enhance the process. A completeness test can help identify gaps or omissions in the chronology of events, while a sufficiency test can check the logic in a sequence diagram by comparing two adjoining facts to verify if one fact always leads to the second fact. 

Several quality assurance tests should be applied when using predefined trees. Firstly, predefined trees are designed to capture most root causes, but may not be comprehensive. A completeness check should be conducted on each branch of the tree to see if there are other root causes associated with the category of that branch that are not listed on the tree. 

Predefined trees are a convenient means of identifying root causes. Providing all of the causal factors have been determined, use of a comprehensive predefined tree should ensure that most, if not all, root causes are identified. Several quality assurance tests should help identify any remaining root causes. 

In chemistry, as in many other sciences, statistical methods are unavoidable. Whether it is a calibration curve or the result of a single analysis, interpretation can only be ascertained if the margin of error is known. This section deals with fundamental principles of statistics and describes the treatment of errors involved in commonly used tests in chemistry. When a measurement is repeated, a statistical analysis is compulsory. However, sampling laws and hypothesis tests must be mastered to avoid meaningless conclusions and to ensure the design of meaningful quality assurance tests. Systematic errors (instrumental, user-based, etc.) and gross errors that lead to out-of-limit results will not be considered here. 

In addition to determining the presence or absence of pollutants of interest in the sample, the routine analysis must include quality control/quality assurance tests to determine the precision and accuracy of the test results and any possible source of errors such as sample contamination, absence of preservative, or exceeding of sample holding time. The QA/QC is discussed at length in Chapter 1.2. 

Twelve years after the weekly quality assurance testing regime had been implemented in EEL, Crowson et al. [47] summarized the results obtained in an attempt to determine the best methods for preventing contamination. They also provided information on the lessons learned and suggestions for improvement. 

Although there are some differences between the European [139] and the US guidance [137,138], e.g., the composition of the dissolution media, it should be pointed out that both recommend dissolution studies as quality assurance tests as well as for bioequivalence surrogate inference. The latter aspect is particularly well developed in the FDA guidance [138] in the framework of the biopharmaceutics classification system, which is treated in Section 6.6.1. 

In addition to all of the above tests, quality assurance tests during encapsulation demonstrate the integrity of each 252cf sales package and neutron source. 

TEER, normalized to surface, was 188-221 Ohm/cm2 in CACO-2 cells and 78-125 Ohm/cm2 in colon (Rubas et al. 1996). The presence of villi and crypts in vivo with a higher surface and a different cellular composition (goblet cells, M cells, higher permeability in crypts) compared to a cell mono-layer might lead to higher permeability. Tanaka et al. (1995) compared permeability of FITC-Dextran (MW 4000) in CACO-2 cells and rat jejunum and colon the permeability was 10 fold decreased in CACO-2 compared to jejunum and 5 fold lower than in colon. TEER in CACO-2 was 470 Ohm x cm2 in this study, 40 Ohm x cm2 in rat jejunum and 80 Ohm x cm2 in rat colon. Permeability of standard markers like PEG was compared between CACO-2 cells and colon (Artursson et al. 1993). The conclusion for cellular studies is to select cells with acceptable TEER and permeability values and to perform quality assurance tests on a regular basis. 

Quality. Additional quality assurance tests or validations. 

Quality control or quality assurance tests are already common throughout the industry. Many of these tests are physical measurements that have been derived empirically. Rather than relating to the fundamental physical properties of foods, they are designed to detect deviation from a standard sample already defined to be of acceptable quality. While useful, they should not be confused with the measurements necessary to understand how components interact with each other to form the complex composite structure required in most foods. 

The Paul Ehrlich Institut of Germany recalled certain batches of human albumin products (Human Albumin 20%, Human Albumin 20% Immuno, Human Albumin Immuno 20%, Human Albumin 25% Immuno), including batches that had exceeded 12 months of shelf life (22). This action was taken after quality assurance tests had shown that the aluminium content of these batches had exceeded the maximum acceptable concentration of 200 ng/ml. 

All equipment, processes, and quality assurance test procedures must be validated (or verified if using a compendial method) prior to the start of Process Validation. 

Figure 5-4. Required quality assurance testing level for heat exchanger or condenser tubing depends on the service category standard, process, or critical.

Glove quality standards have been established by the FDA based on a sampling scheme and a quality assurance test known as the 1000 mL water leak test described in the Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 800.20 [127]. The Final Rule was published in December 12, 1990, and became effective March 12, 1991. The acceptable quality level is a maximum failure rate of 2.5% for surgeons gloves and of 4.0% for patient examination gloves as determined in this water leak test. 

The uncertainty information for these values that is needed to estimate the uncertainty in the calculated radionuclide activity may be given in the compilation or in the cited original studies. Any consistent deviations beyond this uncertainty in quality assurance test comparisons from the reported values may suggest, among other causes, an erroneous decay fraction in current use by the laboratory. 

It therefore becomes necessary to quantify quality in the frame of quality assurance tests. Quahty assurance comprises all activities that lead to fulfillment of the defined requirements. They include the totality of operations in quality management, quality planning, quality directing, and quahty tests. 

---