Qualitative analysis immunochemical

Several qualitative and quantitative immunochemical methods for CAP analysis in biological matrices of animal origin have been described [101,102, 104,105] (see Table 3). Van de Water et al. [ 102] described an ELISA that detected CAP in swine muscle tissue with an IC50 value of 3 ng mL1. This immunoassay was improved and subsequently optimized incorporating the streptavidin-biotin amplification system. There are also several commercially available test kits (see Table 4). RIDASCREEN is a competitive enzyme immunoassay for the quantitative analysis of CAP residues in milk, eggs, and meat in a microtiter plate. The measurement is made photometrically, obtaining a LOD of 100 ng L 1 in meat and eggs and 150 ng L 1 in milk. The test has been also applied to the analysis of tetracyclines. 

Immunochemical methods have been developed and placed on the market to analyze tetracycline residues (see Table 4). Thus, a qualitative EIA has been developed and used to analyze tetracyclines in honey samples with a detection level of 20 pg/kg-1 [96]. A microplate-based indirect ELISA has been developed to analyze tetracyclines using polyclonal antibodies. The assay could measure tetracycline in the range between 0.1 and 6 ng mL L Other tetracycline antibiotics such as chlortetracycline, rolitetracycline, or minocycline are also highly recognized in this assay [98]. Several immunoassay kits are commercially available for the analysis of tetracyclines although, to our knowledge, none of them... 

Coupling chromatographic procedures with immunochemical techniques can also provide a very sensitive and specific analytical system for either determinative or confirmatory analysis. If the antibody used is very specific for the analyte of interest and the antibody reactivity is known to be sensitive to small variations in the structure of the analyte tested, positive reactions with the method are strongly indicative that an analyte of defined structural characteristics is present in the sample. Full rigorous confirmation, however, would depend on further analysis by mass spectrometry, which is the method of choice in confirmatory analysis. Mass spectrometry gives specific information on the identity and structure of the compound of interest. Coupled with chromatographic techniques it becomes a very powerful confirmatory tool for both quantitative and qualitative assessment of drug residues in foods. 

For qualitative screening, a visual comparison of color with standards can be made. For semiquantitative determination, however, a spectrophotometer should be used to read absorbance to plot a calibration standard curve. The color should be read as soon as possible because it becomes unstable after 30 min. The required period for incubation varies from substance to substance but can range from 5 to 10 min to 1 or 2 hours. In certain analysis, the immunochemical reaction may require quenching after a specific amount of time. The reaction can be stopped by adding an acid, such as 1 N HC1, which turns the blue to yellow. The intensity of yellow too can be measured to determine the analyte concentration in the sample. 

Several qualitative and quantitative immunochemical methods and their application to the analysis of environmental samples have been described for OP insecticides, a family that includes widely used pesticides such as azinphos-ethyl/methyl, dichlorvos, fenitrothion or fenthion, malathion, mevinphos, and parathion. Mercader and Montoya202 produced monoclonal antibodies against azinphos-methyl and developed an ELISA that was used for the analysis of water samples from different sources, reaching detectability levels near 0.05 pg I. Watanabe et al.203 reported the production of polyclonal antibodies and ELISA procedures to analyze fenitrothion in river, tap, and mineral water (LOD = 0.3 pg L ). Banks et al.204 produced polyclonal antibodies against dichlorvos, an organophosphate insecticide used for stored grain, which also cross-reacts with fenitrothion. Nishi et al.205 reported the first immunoassay for malathion. Residues of this insecticide have... 

As an analytical approach to residue analysis, immunoassay methods are not well characterized, and no validation protocols have been established. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, whose primary purpose is validation of analytical methods, established a Task Force on Test Kits and Proprietary Methods (2), which has addressed some of the issues relating to immunoassay methods. The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry s Commission on Food Chemistry has established a Working Group on Immunochemical Methods, whose first project is to develop draft guidelines on criteria for evaluation, validation, and quality control for r o-immunoassay methods (10). Similar guidelines for EIAs will also be developed. These documents will assist in development and standardization of requirements for precision for both between-laboratories and within-laboratory andyses, accuracy, and ruggedness, and— for qualitative methods— false positive and false negative rates. 

In general, immunochemical analyses of antibody-antigen interactions can provide both qualitative and quantitative information. Howevo-, these approaches lack the ability to provide information regarding the detailed locations of epitopes on antigens. In order to obtain such information, one must conduct structural analysis on antibody-antigen complexes. 

Immunoreagents are well suited for quantitation of amplified DNA. However, the exponential nature of PCR amplification makes it difficult to extrapolate from the amount of amplified DNA to the amount of starting material. The most reliable quantitative PCR methods involve real-time assay of amplified DNA during the exponential phase of the amplification reaction. Because the analyte of interest is usually the DNA template, not the amplification product, immunochemical methods at their present stage of development are generally best applied to an unamplified template where concentrations permit direct analysis or for qualitative assays. 

---